Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 214, Issue 1–4, pp 103–130 | Cite as

Collapse of species boundaries in the wild potatoSolanum brevicaule complex (Solanaceae, S. sect.Petota): Molecular data

  • Joseph T. Miller
  • David M. Spooner


TheSolanum brevicaule complex is a group of morphologically very similar wild and cultivated potato taxa (Solanum sect.Petota). This study uses single to low-copy nuclear RFLPs and RAPDs to investigate their species boundaries and relationships. Cladistic analyses of both data sets are largely concordant with each other and with a recently published phenetic analyses of the same accessions using morphology. All three data sets separate members of the complex into populations from Peru and immediately adjacent northwestern Bolivia, including most cultivated species accessions, and populations from northwestern Bolivia to Argentina. The molecular results suggest that the complex is paraphyletic as currently circumscribed. Many species of theS. brevicaule complex should be relegated to synonymy.

Key words

Solanaceae sect.Petota Solanum brevicaule Domestication hybridization potatoes systematics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldrich, P. R., Doebley, J., 1992: Restriction fragment variation in the nuclear and chloroplast genomes of cultivated and wildSorghum bicolor. — Theor. Appl. Genet.85: 293–302.Google Scholar
  2. Astley, D., Hawkes, J. G., 1979: The nature of the Bolivian weed speciesSolanum sucrense Hawkes. — Euphytica28: 685–696.Google Scholar
  3. Bamberg, J. B., Martin, M. W., Schartner, J. J., Spooner, D. M., 1996: Inventory of tuber-bearingSolanum species. — Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin: Potato Introduction Station, NRSP-6.Google Scholar
  4. Bark, O. H., Havey, M. J., 1995: Similarities and relationships among populations of the bulb onion as estimated by nuclear RFLPs. — Theor. Appl. Genet.90: 407–414.Google Scholar
  5. Baum, D. A., Donoghue, M. J., 1995: Choosing among alternative “phylogenetic” species concepts. — Syst. Bot.20: 560–573.Google Scholar
  6. Bonierbale, M. W., Ganal, M. W., Tanksley, S. D., 1995: Applications of restriction fragment length polymorphisms and genetic mapping in potato breeding and molecular genetics. — InVayda, M. E., Park, W. D., (Eds): The molecular and cellular biology of the potato, pp. 13–24. — Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
  7. Brubaker, C. L., Wendel, J. F., 1994: Reevaluating the origin of domesticated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum;Malvaceae) using nuclear restriction fragment length poly-morphisms (RFLPs). — Amer. J. Bot.81: 1309–1326.Google Scholar
  8. Brucher, H., 1964: El origin de la papa (Solanum tuberosum) — Physis24: 439–452.Google Scholar
  9. Brummer, E. C., Bouton, J. H., Kochert, G., 1995: Analysis of annualMedicago species using RAPD markers. — Genome38: 362–367.Google Scholar
  10. Bruneau, A. E., Dickson, E., Knapp, S., 1995: Congruence of chloroplast DNA restriction site characters with morphological and isozyme data inSolanum sect.Lasiocarpa. — Canad. J. Bot.73: 1151–1167.Google Scholar
  11. Catalán, P., 1995: Molecular phylogeny of the grass genusBrachypodium P. Beauv. based of RFLP and RAPD analysis. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.117: 263–280.Google Scholar
  12. Cribb, P. J., Hawkes, J. G., 1986: Experimental evidence for the origin ofSolanum tuberosum subspeciesandigena. — InD'Arcy, W. G., (Ed.):Solanaceae: biology and systematics, pp. 383–404. — New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dawson, I. K., Simons, A. J., Waugh, R., Powell, W., 1996: Detection and pattern of interspecific hybridization betweenGliricidia sepium andG. maculata in Meso-America revealed by PCR-based assays. — Molec. Ecol.5: 89–98.Google Scholar
  14. Debener, T., Salamini, F., Gebhardt, C., 1990: Phylogeny of wild and cultivatedSolanum species based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLPs). — Theor. Appl. Genet.79: 360–368.Google Scholar
  15. Dos Santos, J. B., Nienhuis, J., Skroch, P., Tivang, J., Slocum, M. K., 1994: Comparison of RAPD and RFLP genetic markers in determining genetic similarities amongBrassica oleracea L. genotypes. — Theor. Appl. Genet.87: 909–915.Google Scholar
  16. Doyle, J. J., 1995: The irrelevance of allele tree topologies for species delimitation, and a non-topological alternative. — Syst. Bot.20: 574–588.Google Scholar
  17. Feinberg, A. P., Volgelstein, B., 1984: Addendum. A technique for radiolabelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. — Analyt. Biochem.137: 266–267.Google Scholar
  18. Giannattasio, R. B., Spooner, D. M., 1994: A reexamination of species boundaries and hypotheses of hybridization concerningSolanum megistacrolobum andS. toralapanum (Solanum sect.Petota, seriesMegistacroloba): molecular data. — Syst. Bot.19: 106–115.Google Scholar
  19. Halward, T., Stalker, T., Larue, E., Kochert, G., 1992: Use of single-primer DNA amplifications in genetic studies of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). — Pl. Molec. Biol.18: 315–325.Google Scholar
  20. Hanneman, R. E., Jr., 1989: The potato germplasm resource. — Amer. Potato J.66: 655–667.Google Scholar
  21. Hawkes, J. G., 1958: Kartoffel: I. Taxonomy, cytology and crossability. — InKappert, H., Rudorf, W., (Eds): Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung,3, pp. 1–43. 2nd edn. — Berlin: Parey.Google Scholar
  22. —, 1990: The potato: evolution, biodiversity and genetic resources. — Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  23. —, 1969: The potatoes of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay: a biosystematic study. — Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. —, 1989: The potatoes of Bolivia: their breeding value and evolutionary relationships. — Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Heun, M., Murphy, J. P., Phillips, T. D., 1994: A comparison of RAPD and isozyme analyses for determining the genetic relationships amongAvena sterilis L. accessions. — Theor. Appl. Genet.87: 689–696.Google Scholar
  26. Hilu, K. W., Stalker, H. T., 1995: Genetic relationships between peanut and wild species ofArachis sect.Arachis (Fabaceae): evidence from RAPDs. — Pl. Syst. Evol.198: 167–178.Google Scholar
  27. Hosaka, K., 1995: Successive domestication and evolution of the Andean potatoes as revealed by chloroplast DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. — Theor. Appl. Genet.90: 356–363.Google Scholar
  28. —,Hanneman, R. E., Jr., 1988: Origin of chloroplast DNA diversity in Andean potatoes. — Theor. Appl. Genet.76: 333–340.Google Scholar
  29. —, 1992: RFLP analysis of the wild potato species,Solanum acaule Bitter (Solanum sect.Petota). — Theor. Appl. Genet.84: 851–858.Google Scholar
  30. Kardolus, J. P., Van Eck, H. J., Van Den Berg, R. G., 1997: The potential of AFLPs in biosytematics: a first application inSolanum taxonomy. — Pl. Syst. Evol.210: 87–103.Google Scholar
  31. Kim, K. J., Jansen, R. K., 1994: Comparisons of phylogenetic hypotheses among different data sets in dwarf dandelions (Krigia, Asteraceae); additional information from internal transcribed spacer sequence of nuclear ribosomal DNA. — Pl. Syst. Evol.190: 157–185.Google Scholar
  32. Loarce, Y., Gallego, R., Ferrer, E., 1996: A comparative analysis of the genetic relation-ships between rye cultivars using RFLP and RAPD markers. — Euphytica88: 107–115.Google Scholar
  33. Luckow, M., 1995: Species concepts: assumptions, methods, and applications. — Syst. Bot.20: 589–605.Google Scholar
  34. Maddison, W., 1995: Phylogenetic histories within and among species. — InHoch, P. C., Stephenson, A. G., (Eds): Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics, pp. 273–287. — St. Louis: Missouri Botanical GardenGoogle Scholar
  35. Margale, E., Herve, Y., Hu, J., Ouiros, C. F., 1995: Determination of genetic variability by RAPD markers in cauliflower, cabbage and kale local cultivars from France. — Genet. Res. Crop Evol.42: 281–289.Google Scholar
  36. Matsubayashi, M., 1981: Phylogenetic relationships in the potato and its related species. — InTsuchiya, T., Gupta, P. K., (Eds): Chromosome engineering in plants: genetic, breeding, evolution, part B, pp. 93–118. — Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  37. Mcdade, L. A., 1992: Hybrids and phylogenetics systematics II. The impact of hybrids on cladistic analysis. — Evolution46: 1329–1346.Google Scholar
  38. —, 1995: Hybridization and phylogenetics. — InHoch, P. C., Stephenson, A. G., (Eds): Experimental and molecular approaches to plant systematics, pp. 305–331. — St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
  39. Mickevich, M. F., Farris, J. S., 1981: The implication of congruence inMenidia. — Syst. Zool.30: 351–370.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, J. T., 1997: Collapse of species in the wild potatoSolanum brevicaule complex (Solanaceae: sect.Petota). — Ph.D Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  41. —, 1996: Introgression ofSolanum chacoense (Solanum sect.Petota) upland populations reexamined. — Syst. Bot.21: 461–475.Google Scholar
  42. Nixon, K. C., Wheeler, O. D., 1990: An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. — Cladistics6: 211–223.Google Scholar
  43. Ochoa, C. M., 1990: The potatoes of South American: Bolivia. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Olmstead, R. G., 1995: Species concepts and plesiomorphic species. — Syst. Bot.20: 623–630.Google Scholar
  45. —, 1994: Chloroplast DNA and systematics: a review of methods and data analysis. — Amer. J. Bot.81: 1205–1224.Google Scholar
  46. —, 1994: Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in theSolanaceae. — Syst. Biol.43: 467–481.Google Scholar
  47. Oxelman, B., 1996: RAPD patterns, nrDNA ITS sequences and morphological patterns inSilene sectionSedoideae (Caryophyllaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.201: 93–116.Google Scholar
  48. Prince, J. P., Lackney, V. K., Angeles, C., Blauth, J. R., Kyle, M. M., 1995: A survey of DNA polymorphism within the genusCapsicum and the fingerprinting of pepper cultivars. — Genome38: 224–231.Google Scholar
  49. Rice, K. A., Donoghue, M. J., Olmstead, R. G., 1997: Reanalysis of a largerbcL dataset: implications for future phylogenetic studies. — Syst. Biol.46: 554–562.Google Scholar
  50. Rieseberg, L. H., 1996: Homology among RAPD fragments in interspecific comparisons. — Molec. Evol.5: 99–105.Google Scholar
  51. —, 1994: Are many plant species paraphyletic? — Taxon43: 21–32.Google Scholar
  52. Sas, 1995: JMP statistics made visual, version 3.02. — Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
  53. Skroch, P. W., Nienhuis, J., 1995: Qualitative and quantitative characterization of RAPD variation among snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes. — Theor. Appl. Genet.91: 1078–1085.Google Scholar
  54. Shanmukhaswami, S. S., De Oliveira, A. C., Godwin, I. D., Bennetzen, J. L., 1995: Assessment of genome origins and genetic diversity in the genusEleusine with DNA markers. — Genome38: 757–763.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, J. J., Scott-Craig, J. S., Leadbetter, J. R., Bush, G. L., Roberts, D. L., Fulbright, D. W., 1994: Characterization of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) products fromXanthomonas campestris and some comments on the use of RAPD products in phylogenetic analyses. — Molec. Phylogenet. Evol.3: 135–145.Google Scholar
  56. Song, K., Osborn, T. C., Williams, P. H., 1990:Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) 3. Genome relationships inBrassica and related genera and the origin ofB. oleracea andB. rapa (syn.campestris). — Theor. Appl. Genet.79: 497–506.Google Scholar
  57. Spooner, D. M., Castillo-T., R., 1997: Reexamination of series relationships of South American wild potatoes (Solanaceae:Solanum Sect.Petota): evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. — Amer. J. Bot.84: 671–685.Google Scholar
  58. —, 1992: Reexamination of series relationships of Mexican and Central American wild potatoes (Solanum sect.Petota): evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. — Syst. Bot.17: 432–448.Google Scholar
  59. —, 1996: Comparison of four molecular markers in measuring relationships among the wild potato relativesSolanum sectionEtuberosum (subgenusPotatoe). — Theor. Appl. Genet.92: 532–540.Google Scholar
  60. —, 1992: An analysis of recent taxonomic concepts in wild potatoes (Solanum sect.Petota). — Genet. Res. Crop Evol.39: 23–37.Google Scholar
  61. —, 1997: Species boundaries and interrelationships of two closely related sympatric diploid wild potato species,Solanum astleyi andS. boliviense based on RAPD's. — Theor. Appl. Genet.95: 764–771.Google Scholar
  62. Stammers, M., Harris, J., Evans, G. M., Hayward, M. D., Forster, J. W., 1995: Use of random PCR (RAPD) technology to analyze phylogenetic relationships in theLolium/Festuca complex. — Heredity74: 19–27.Google Scholar
  63. Swofford, D. L., 1991: When are phylogeny estimates from morphological and molecular data incongruent? — InMiyamoto, M. M., Cracraft, J., (Eds): Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences, pp. 295–333. — New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. —, 1993: PAUP: phylogenetic analyses using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Computer program. — Champaign, IL.: Illinois Natural History Survey.Google Scholar
  65. Tanksley, S. D., Ganal, M. W., Prince, J. P., De Vicente, N. C., Bonierbale, M. W., Broun, P., Fulton, T. M., Giovannoni, J. J., Grandillo, S., Martin, G. B., Messenguer, R., Miller, J. C., Miller, L., Paterson, A. H., Pineda, O., Roder, M. S., Wing, R. A., Wu, W., Young, N. D., 1992: High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. — Genetics132: 1141–1160.Google Scholar
  66. Thormann, C. E., Ferreira, M. E., Camargo, L. E. A., Tivang, J. G., Osborn, T. C., 1994: Comparison of RFLP and RAPD markers for estimating genetic relationship within and among cruciferous species. — Theor. Appl. Genet.88: 973–980.Google Scholar
  67. Ugent, D., 1966: Hybrid weed complexes inSolanum, sectionTuberarium. — Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  68. —, 1970: The potato. — Science170: 1161–1166.Google Scholar
  69. Van Coppenolle, B., Watanabe, I., Van Hove, C., Mccouch, S. R., 1993: Genetic diversity and phylogeny analysis ofAzolla based on DNA amplification by arbitrary primers. — Genome36: 686–693.Google Scholar
  70. Van Buren, R., Harper, K. T., Andersen, W. R., Stanten, D. J., Seymoum, S., England, J. L., 1994: Evaluating the relationship of autumn buttercup (Ranunculus acriformis var.aestivalis) to some close congeners using random amplified polymorphic DNA. — Amer. J. Bot.81: 514–519.Google Scholar
  71. Van Den Berg, R. G., Groendijk-Wilders, N., Kardolas, J. P., 1996: The wild ancestors of cultivated potato: thebrevicaule-complex. — Acta Bot. Neerl.45: 157–171.Google Scholar
  72. —, 1998: Collapse of morphological species in the wild potatoSolanum brevicaule complex (Solanaceae: sect.Petota). — Amer. J. Bot.85: 92–109.Google Scholar
  73. Van Heusden, A. W., Bachmann, K., 1992: Genotype relationships inMicroseris elegans (Asteraceae, Lactuceae) revealed by DNA amplification from arbitrary primers (RAPDs). — Pl. Syst. Evol.179: 221–233.Google Scholar
  74. White, P. S., Gilbert, M. L., Nguyen, H. T., Vierling, R. A., 1995: Maximum parsimony accurately reconstructs relationships of eliteSorghum lines. — Crop Sci.35: 1560–1565.Google Scholar
  75. Wilkie, S. E., Isaac, P. G., Slater, R. J., 1993: Random amplified DNA (RAPD) markers for genetic analysis inAllium. — Theor. Appl. Genet.86: 497–504.Google Scholar
  76. Williams, C. E., St. Clair, D. A., 1993: Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of cultivated and wild accessions ofLycopersicon esculentum. — Genome36: 619–630.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph T. Miller
    • 1
  • David M. Spooner
    • 1
  1. 1.Vegetable Crops Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Department of HorticultureUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations