Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 225, Issue 1–4, pp 43–72

Phylogeny and classification of the subfamily Rubioideae (Rubiaceae)

  • B. Bremer
  • J. -F. Manen
Article

Abstract

We performed phylogenetic analyses of the subfamily Rubioideae (Rubiaceae) based on three different pieces of chloroplast DNA, the protein codingrbcL gene, the spacer sequence betweenatpB andrbcL (atpB-rbcL), and the recently published (Andersson and Rova 1999)rps16 intron data. NewrbcL sequences have been produced for 41 taxa and there are 52 newatpB-rbcL spacer sequences. All analyses gave similar results concerning the phylogeny, but they differ slightly in resolution and support for the various branches. The minor tribes Ophiorrhizeae, Urophylleae, Lasiantheae, and Coussareeae form a grade to the rest of the subfamily, which consists of two well-supported branches, the Psychotrieae alliance and the Spermacoceae alliance, including a majority of all genera and species. Based on the resulting phylogenies we present a revised classification of the Rubioideae. We accept 16 tribes of which 12 more or less correspond to earlier tribal circumscriptions: Anthospermeae, Argostemmateae, Craterispermeae, Gaertnereae, Morindeae, Paederieae, Psychotrieae, Schradereae, Spermacoceae, Rubieae, Theligoneae, and Urophylleae; two tribes have received new and very different circumscriptions: Ophiorrhizeae and Coussareeae; and two are new to science: Lasiantheae and Danaideae.

Key words

Rubiaceae Rubioideae Danaideae Lasiantheae chloroplast DNA rbcatpB-rbcL spacer rps16 intron phylogeny classification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson L., Rova J. H. (1999) Therps16 intron and the phylogeny of the Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 214: 161–186.Google Scholar
  2. Andreasen K., Bremer B. (1996) Phylogeny of the subfamily Ixoroideae (Rubiaceae). Opera Bot. Belgica 7: 119–138.Google Scholar
  3. Axelius B. (1987) The genusLerchea (Rubiaceae). Blumea 32: 91–114.Google Scholar
  4. Axelius B. (1990) The genusXanthophytum (Rubiaceae) — Taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography. Blumea 34: 425–497.Google Scholar
  5. Backlund M., Oxelman B., Bremer B. (2000) Phylogenetic relationships within the Gentianales based onndhF andrbcL sequences, with particular reference to the Loganiaceae. Am. J. Bot. 87: 1029–1043.Google Scholar
  6. Bir S. S., Singh G., Gill B. S. (1984) Cromosome number reports LXXXII. In: Löve R. (ed.) Rubiaceae. Taxon 33: 128–129.Google Scholar
  7. Bremekamp C. E. B. (1952) The African species ofOldenlandia L. sensu Hiern et K. Schumann. Verh. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Afd. Naturk., Tweede Sect. 48 (2): 1–298.Google Scholar
  8. Bremekamp C. E. B. (1954) Les sous-familles et les tribus des Rubiacées. Huitiéme congrès international de botanique, rapports et communications, Paris Sect. 2–6: 113–114.Google Scholar
  9. Bremekamp C. E. B. (1966) Remarks on the position, the delimitation and the subdivison of the Rubiaceae. Acta Bot. Neerlandica 15: 1–33.Google Scholar
  10. Bremer B. (1979) The genusNeurocalyx (Rubiaceae-Argostemmateae) in Ceylon. Bot. Not. 132: 399–407.Google Scholar
  11. Bremer B. (1984) The genusSteenisia (Rubiaceae) and its taxonomic position. Nord. J. Bot. 4: 333–345.Google Scholar
  12. Bremer B. (1989) The GenusArgostemma (Rubiaceae-Argostemmateae) in Borneo. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 76: 7–49.Google Scholar
  13. Bremer B. (1996a) Phylogenetic studies within Rubiaceae and relationships to other families based on molecular data. Opera Bot. Belgica 7: 33–50.Google Scholar
  14. Bremer B. (1996b) Combined and separate analyses of morphological and molecular data in the plant family Rubiaceae. Cladistics 12: 21–40.Google Scholar
  15. Bremer B., Andreasen K., Olsson D. (1995) Subfamilial and tribal relationships in the Rubiaceae based onrbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 383–397.Google Scholar
  16. Bremer B., Jansen R. K. (1991) Comparative restriction site mapping of the chloroplast DNA implies new phylogenetic relationships within the Rubiaceae. Am. J. Bot. 78: 198–213.Google Scholar
  17. Bremer B., Backlund M., Lantz H., Kim K. J. (1999) More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny — case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Syst. Biol. 48: 413–435.Google Scholar
  18. Bremer B., Thulin M. (1998) Collapse of Isertieae, re-establishment of Mussaendeae, and a new genus of Sabiceeae (Rubiaceae); phylogenetic relationships based onrbcL data. Plant Syst. Evol. 211: 71–92.Google Scholar
  19. Buchner R., Puff C. (1993) The genus complexDanais-Schismatoclada-Payera (Rubiaceae). Character states, generic delimitation and taxonomic position. Adansonia 1–4: 23–74.Google Scholar
  20. Darwin S. P. (1976) The pacific species ofOphiorrhiza L. (Rubiaceae). Lyonia 1: 47–102.Google Scholar
  21. Dwyer J. D. (1966) Notes on Coussareeae (Rubiaceae), especially the Panamanian species. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 53: 368–374.Google Scholar
  22. Holmgren P. K., Holmgren N. H., Barnett L. C. (eds.) (1990) Index herbariorum, Part I: The herbaria of the world. Regnum Veg.Google Scholar
  23. Igersheim A. (1992) The ovary, fruit and seed development ofCraterispermum (Rubiaceae). Belgian J. Bot. 125: 101–113.Google Scholar
  24. Igersheim A., Puff C., Leint P., Erbar C. (1994) Gynoecial development ofGaertnera Lam. and of presumbly allied taxa of the Psychotrieae (Rubiaceae): secondarily “superior” vs. inferior ovaries. Bot. Jahrb. 116: 401–414.Google Scholar
  25. Igersheim A., Robbrecht E. (1993) The character states and relationships of the Prismatomerideae (Rubiaceae-Rubioideae). Opera Bot. Belgica 6: 61–80.Google Scholar
  26. Igersheim A., Rohrhofer U. (1993) The tribal position ofOtiophora (Rubiaceae): new evidence from gynoecium structure and development. S. Afr. J. Bot. 59: 431–441.Google Scholar
  27. Jansen S., Robbrecht E., Beeckman H., Smets E. (1996)Gaertnera andPagamea: genera within the Psyhotrieae or consistituting the tribe Gaertnereae? A wood anatomical and palynological approach. Bot. Acta 109: 466–476.Google Scholar
  28. Johansson J. T. (1987)Motleyia, a new genus of the Rubiaceae from Borneo. Blumea 32: 149–155.Google Scholar
  29. Johansson J. T. (1987) Revision of the genusPrismatomeris Thw. (Rubiaceae, Morindeae). Opera Bot. 94: 1–62.Google Scholar
  30. Johansson J. T. (1989) Revision of the genusRennellia Korth. (Rubiaceae-Rubioideae). Blumea 34: 3–19.Google Scholar
  31. Johansson J. T. (1994) The genusMorinda (Morindeae, Rubioideae, Rubiaceae) in New Caledonia: taxonomy and phylogeny. Opera Bot. 122: 1–67.Google Scholar
  32. Kiehn M. (1986) Karyosystematic studies on Rubiaceae: Chromosome counts from Sri Lanka. Plant Syst. Evol. 154: 213–223.Google Scholar
  33. Kiehn M. (1995) Chromosome survey of the Rubiaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 398–408.Google Scholar
  34. Kirkbride J. H. (1976) A revision of the genusDeclieuxia (Rubiaceae). Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 28 (4): 1–87.Google Scholar
  35. Manen J.-F., Natali A. (1996) The chloroplastatpB-rbcL spacer in Rubiaceae. Opera Bot. Belgica 7: 51–57.Google Scholar
  36. Manen J. F., Natali A. (1995) Comparison of the evolution of ribulose-1, 5-biphosphate carboxylase (rbcL) andatpB-rbcL noncoding spacer sequences in a recent plant group, the tribeRubieae (Rubiaceae). J. Mol. Evol. 41: 920–927.Google Scholar
  37. Manen J. F., Natali A., Ehrendorfer F. (1994) Phylogeny of Rubiaceae-Rubieae inferred from the sequence of a cpDNA intergene region. Plant Syst. Evol. 190: 195–211.Google Scholar
  38. Mena P. (1990) A revision of the genusArcytophyllum (Rubiaceae: Hedyotideae). Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 60: 1–26.Google Scholar
  39. Natali A., Manen J.-F., Kiehn M., Ehrendorfer F. (1995) Phylogeny of the Rubiaceae-Rubioideae, in particular the tribe Rubieae: evidence from a non-coding chloroplast DNA sequence. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 428–439.Google Scholar
  40. Natali A., Manen J.-F., Ehrendorfer F. (1996) Tribal, generic and specific relationships in the Rubioideae-Rubieae (Rubiaceae) based on sequence data of the cpDNA intergene spacer. Opera Bot. Belgica 7: 193–203.Google Scholar
  41. Nepokroeff M., Bremer B., Sytsma K. J. (1999) Reorganization of the genusPsychotria (Rubiaceae) inferred from ITS andrbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 24: 5–27.Google Scholar
  42. Olmstead R. G., Bremer B., Scott K. M., Palmer J. D. (1993) A parsimony analysis of the Asteridaesensu lato based onrbcL sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 700–722.Google Scholar
  43. Puff C. (1982) The delimitation of the tribe Anthospemeae and its affinities to the Paederieae (Rubiaceae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84: 355–377.Google Scholar
  44. Puff C. (1986) A biosystematic study of the African and Madagascan Rubiaceae-Anthospermeae. Plant Syst. Evol. [Suppl.] 3: 1–535.Google Scholar
  45. Puff C. (1988) Observation onCarphalea Juss. (Rubiaceae, Hedyotideae), with particular reference to the Madagascan taxa and its taxonomic position. Bull. Jard. Bot. Belg. 58: 271–323.Google Scholar
  46. Puff C., Andersson L., Rohrhofer U., Igersheim A. (1993) The tribe Schradereae (Rubiaceae) reexamined. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 114: 449–479.Google Scholar
  47. Puff C., Buchner R. (1994) Revision ofDanais Vent. (Rubiaceae) in Madagascar and the Comores. Adansonia 1: 11–64.Google Scholar
  48. Puff C., Buchner R. (1998)Lecananthus andLeucocodon, two genera to be added to the tribe Schradereae (Rubiaceae). Blumea 43: 265–286.Google Scholar
  49. Puff C., Buchner R., Greimler J. (1998a) Revision ofLecananthus (Rubiaceae-Schradereae). Blumea 43: 337–346.Google Scholar
  50. Puff C., Greimler J., Buchner R. (1998b) Revision ofSchradera (Rubiaceae-Schradereae) in Malesia. Blumea 43: 287–335.Google Scholar
  51. Puff C., Igersheim A. (1994) The character states and taxonomic position ofMetabolus Bl. (syn.Allaeophania Thw.) (Rubiaceae). Bull. Jard. Bot. Belg. 63: 241–262.Google Scholar
  52. Puff C., Robbrecht E. (1989) A survey of theKnoxieae (Rubiaceae-Antirheoideae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 110: 511–558.Google Scholar
  53. Robbrecht E. (1982) Pollen morphology of the tribes Anthospermeae and Paederieae (Rubiaceae) in relation to taxonomy. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 52: 349–366.Google Scholar
  54. Robbrecht E. (1988) Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Bot. Belgica 1: 1–271.Google Scholar
  55. Robbrecht E., Puff C., Igersheim A. (1991) The generaMitchella andDamnacanthus. Evidence for their close alliance; comments on the campylotropy in the Rubiaceae and the circumscription of the Morindeae. Blumea 35: 307–345.Google Scholar
  56. Schumann K. (ed.) (1891) Rubiaceae. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 4 (4). (Wilhelm) Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  57. Seelanaen T., Schnabel A., Wendel J. F. (1997) Congruence and consensus in the cotton tribe. Syst. Bot. 22: 259–290.Google Scholar
  58. Snow D. W. (1981) Tropical frugivorous birds and their food plants: a word survey. Biotropica 13: 1–14.Google Scholar
  59. Swofford D. L. (1993) PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 3.1. 1. Computer program. Champaign, Illinois: Illinois Natural History Survey.Google Scholar
  60. Taylor C. M. (1996a) Taxonomic revision ofCruckshanksia andOreopolus (Rubiaceae: Hedyotideae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 83: 461–479.Google Scholar
  61. Taylor C. M. (1996b) Overview of thePsychotrieae (Rubiaceae) in the Neotropics. Opera Bot. Belgica 7: 261–270.Google Scholar
  62. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673–4680.Google Scholar
  63. Thulin M. (1997)Gaillonia (Rubiaceae-Paederieae) in Africa and Arabia. Nord. J. Bot. 18: 31–38.Google Scholar
  64. Verdcourt B. (1958) Remarks on the classification of the Rubiaceae. Bull. Jard. Bot. État 28: 209–281.Google Scholar
  65. Wunderlich R. (1971) Die systematische Stellung vonTheligonum. Oesterr. Bot. Z. 119: 329–394.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Bremer
    • 1
  • J. -F. Manen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Systematic Botany, Evolutionary Biology CentreUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Conservatoire et Jardin BotaniquesUniversité de GenèveChambésySwitzerland

Personalised recommendations