Advertisement

Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 211, Issue 3–4, pp 217–229 | Cite as

Mating systems inOmphalotus (Paxillaceae, Agaricales)

  • Ronald H. Petersen
  • Karen W. Hughes
Article

Abstract

Pairings of monokaryon cultures representingOmphalotus illudens (eastern North America),O. nidiformis (southeastern Australia),O. olearius (southern Europe),O. olivascens (North American Pacific coast), andO. subilludens (southern North America) showed widely variable compatibility patterns.Omphalotus olearius ×O. subilludens ×O. olivascens showed high compatibility, whileO. illudens was significantly less compatible with all other taxa. Isolates ofOmphalotus nidiformis represented an almost genetically isolated biological species. The role of partial compatibility in nomenclatural ranking is discussed.

Key words

Fungi Basidiomycetes Paxillaceae Omphalotus Mating systems speciation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bigelow, H. E., 1982: Species described inClitocybe byC. H. Peck andW. A. Murrill. — Sydowia35: 37–74.Google Scholar
  2. , 1976: A new species ofOmphalotus. — Mycotaxon3: 363–372.Google Scholar
  3. Boidin, J., 1986: Intercompatibility and the species concept in the saprobicBasidiomycotina. — Mycotaxon26: 319–336.Google Scholar
  4. Bruns, T. D., Szaro, T., 1990: Rate and mode differences between nuclear and mitochondrial small-subunit rRNA genes in mushrooms. — Molec. Biol. Evol.9: 836–855.Google Scholar
  5. Carey, S., 1974:Clitocybe illudens: its cultivation, chemistry, and classification. — Mycologia66: 951–968.Google Scholar
  6. Fayod, V., 1889: Prodrome d'une histoire naturelle des Agaricinés. — Paris. (Amsterdam, 1968: Asher; reprint edn.)Google Scholar
  7. Gill, M., Steglich, W., 1987: Pigments of fungi (Macromycetes). — Fortschr. Chem. Organischer Naturst.51: 1–317.Google Scholar
  8. Gordon, S. A., Petersen, R. H., 1992: Interbreeding populations of someMarasmius species. — Mycologia84: 204–208.Google Scholar
  9. ,, 1997: Infraspecific variation among geographically separated collections ofMarasmius androsaceus. — Mycol. Res.101: 365–371.Google Scholar
  10. Horak, E., 1968: Synopsis generum Agaricalium. — Beitr. Kryptogamenfl. Schweiz13: 1–741.Google Scholar
  11. Hughes, K. W., Petersen, R. H., 1998: Relationships amongOmphalotus species (Paxillaceae) based on restriction sites in the ribosomal ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region. — Pl. Syst. Evol.211: 231–237.Google Scholar
  12. Kämmerer, A., Besl, H., Bresinsky, A., 1985:Omphalotaceae fam. nov. undPaxillaceae, ein chemotaxonomischer Vergleich zweier Pilzfamilien derBoletales. — Pl. Syst. Evol.150: 101–118.Google Scholar
  13. Kimbrough, J. W., (Ed.), 1972: Keys to the fleshy basidiomycetes of Florida, byWm. A. Murrill. — Gainesville, Florida: Distributed privately.Google Scholar
  14. Kuyper, T., 1995:Omphalotus. — InBas, C., Kuyper, T. W., Noordeloos, M. E., Vellinga, E. C., (Eds): Flora Agaricina Neerlandica,3, p. 88–89. — Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
  15. Lamoure, D., 1989: Indices of useful information for intercompatibility tests in basidiomycetes.V. Agaricales sensu lato. — Cryptogamie Mycol.10: 41–80.Google Scholar
  16. Mayr, E., 1942: Systematics and the origin of species. — New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. McCleneghan, S. C., 1996: Systematics of thePholiota alnicola andP. spumosa complexes. — Ph. D. Dissertation, unpubl. University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, O. K., 1994: Observations on the genusOmphalotus in Australia. — Mycol. Helvetica2: 91–100.Google Scholar
  19. Murrill, W. A., 1915: The genusClitocybe in North America. — Mycologia7: 256–283.Google Scholar
  20. , 1945: New Florida fungi. — Quart. J. Florida Acad. Sci.8: 175–198.Google Scholar
  21. Nicholl, D. B. G., 1997: Relationships within thePleurotus djamor species complex. — M. Sci. Thesis, unpubl. University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Google Scholar
  22. Petersen, R. H., 1977: Species concept in higherBasidiomycetes: taxonomy, biology, and nomenclature. — InClemençon, H., (Ed.): The species concept inHymenomycetes, pp. 363–380. — Vaduz: Cramer.Google Scholar
  23. , 1995a: There's more to a mushroom than meets the eye: mating studies in theAgaricales. — Mycologia87: 1–17.Google Scholar
  24. , 1995b: Contributions of mating studies to mushroom systematics. — Canad. J. Bot.73: (Suppl.): S831-S842.Google Scholar
  25. , 1997: Mating systems inHymenomycetes: new reports and taxonomic implications. — Mycotaxon.63: 225–259.Google Scholar
  26. McCleneghan, S. C., 1997: Reports on long-distance sexual compatibility inAgaricales. — Nordic J. Bot. (in press).Google Scholar
  27. , 1996: A New ZealandPleurotus with multiple-species sexual compatibility. — Mycologia88: 198–207.Google Scholar
  28. , 1997: Mating system of some putative polyporeagaric relatives. — Pl. Syst. Evol.207: 135–158.Google Scholar
  29. Singer, R., 1948: New and interesting species of basidiomycetes. II. — Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci.32: 103–150.Google Scholar
  30. Takemaru, T., 1961: Genetical studies on fungi. X. The mating system in hymenomycetes and its genetical mechanism. — Biol. J. Okoyama Univ.7: 133–211.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald H. Petersen
    • 1
  • Karen W. Hughes
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany DepartmentUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations