Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 113–152 | Cite as

Syncretism and paradigmatic opposition

  • James P. Blevins
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Paradigmatic Opposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, S. R.: 1992,A-Morphous Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, A. D.: 1990, ‘Unification and Morphological Blocking’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 507–558.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, A. D.: 1982, ‘The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic’, in J. Bresnan (ed.),The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 427–503.Google Scholar
  4. Aronoff, M.: 1976,Word Formation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Bouma, G.: 1992, ‘Feature Structures and Nonmonotonicity’,Computational Linguistics 18, 183–203.Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter, R., and C. Pollard: 1991, ‘Inclusion, Disjointness and Choice: the Logic of Linguistic Classification’, inProceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Berkeley, pp. 9–16.Google Scholar
  7. Curme, G. O.: 1947,English Grammar, Barnes and Noble, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Di Sciullo, A. M. and E. Williams: 1987,On the Definition of Word, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Farkas, D.: 1992, ‘On Obviation’, in I. A. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (eds.),Lexical Matters, CSLI, Stanford, pp. 85–109.Google Scholar
  10. Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. K. Pullum and I. A. Sag: 1985,Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Gazdar, G. and G. K. Pullum: 1982,Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar: A Theoretical Synopsis, distributed by Indiana University Linguistic Club.Google Scholar
  12. Hayes, B.: 1984, ‘Inalterability in CV Phonology’,Language 62, 321–51.Google Scholar
  13. Huddleston, R.: 1984,Introduction to the Grammar of English, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Jackendoff, R.: 1983,Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, M.: 1990, ‘Expressing Disjunctive and Negative Feature Constraints with Classical First-Order Logic’, inProceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Pittsburgh, pp. 173–9.Google Scholar
  16. Kaplan, R. M.: 1987, ‘Three Seductions of Computational Psycholinguistics’, in P. Whitelock, H. Somers, P. Johnson and M. McGee Wood (eds.),Linguistic Theory and Computer Applications, Academic Press, New York, pp. 149–88.Google Scholar
  17. Kaplan, R. M. and J. Bresnan: 1982, ‘Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation’, in J. Bresnan (ed.),The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 173–281.Google Scholar
  18. Karttunen, L.: 1984, ‘Features and Values’,Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Stanford, pp. 28–33.Google Scholar
  19. Kasper, R. T.: 1990, ‘Typed Feature Constraint Systems: Structures and Descriptions’, in H. Trost (ed.),Feature Formalisms and Linguistic Ambiguity, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Kasper, R. T. and W. C. Rounds: 1990, ‘The Logic of Unification in Grammar’,Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 35–58.Google Scholar
  21. Katz, J. J. and J. Fodor: 1963, ‘The Structure of a Semantic Theory’,Language 39, 170–210.Google Scholar
  22. Kay, M.: 1979, ‘Functional Grammar’Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
  23. Kiparsky, P.: 1973, ‘Elsewhere in Phonology’, in S. R. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.),A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 93–106.Google Scholar
  24. Krieger, H.-U. and J. Nerbonne: 1992, ‘Feature-Based Inheritance Networks for Computational Lexicons’, in T. Briscoe, A. Copestake, and V. de Paiva (eds.),Default Inheritance Within Unification-Based Approaches to the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Also published as Report RR-91-31, DFKI, Saarbrucken.Google Scholar
  25. Lederer, H.: 1969,Reference Grammar of the German Language, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Matthews, P. H.: 1973,Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Moshier, M. D. and W. Rounds: 1987, ‘A Logic for Partially Specified Data Structures’, inProceedings of the Fourteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, Munich, pp. 156–67.Google Scholar
  28. Penn, G. and B. Carpenter: 1993, ‘Three Sources of Disjunction in a Typed Feature Structure-Based Resolution System’, in H. Trost (ed.),Feature Formalisms and Linguistic Ambiguity, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  29. Pollard, C. and I. A. Sag: 1987,Information-Based Syntax and Semantics, Volume 1: Fundamentals, CSLI Lecture Notes 13, CSLI, Stanford.Google Scholar
  30. Pollard, C. and I. A. Sag: 1994,Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  31. Poser, W. J.: 1992, ‘Blocking of Phrasal Constructions by Lexical Items’, in I. A. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (eds.),Lexical Matters, CSLI, Stanford, pp. 111–130.Google Scholar
  32. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik: 1985,A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Longman, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Riehemann, S.: 1993,Word Formation in Lexical Type Hierarchies: A Case Study of ‘bar’ — Adjectives in German, Master's thesis, University of Tübingen. Published as SfS-Report-02-93, Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
  34. Sag, I. A., G. Gazdar, T. Wasow and S. Weisler: 1985, ‘Coordintion and How to Distinguish Categories’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 117–71.Google Scholar
  35. Schein, B. and D. Steriade: 1986, ‘On Geminates’,Linguistic Inquiry 17, 691–744.Google Scholar
  36. Shieber, S.: 1986a,An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar, CSLI Lecture Notes 4, CSLI, Stanford.Google Scholar
  37. Shieber, S.: 1986b, ‘A Simple Reconstruction of GPSG’,Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Bonn, pp. 211–5.Google Scholar
  38. Williams, E.: 1994, ‘Remarks on Lexical Knowledge’,Lingua 92, 7–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • James P. Blevins
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for LinguisticsUniversity of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia

Personalised recommendations