Advertisement

Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 200, Issue 3–4, pp 193–211 | Cite as

Phylogenetic relationships in the genusStylosanthes (Leguminosae) based upon chloroplast DNA variation

  • Amanda C. M. Gillies
  • Richard J. Abbott
Article

Abstract

A detailed analysis of chloroplast DNA restriction fragment length variation was undertaken to reconstruct the maternal phylogeny of 18 taxa from both sections of the papilionoid tropical forage legume genusStylosanthes. Data were analysed by means of the computer program PAUP, using an heuristic search with Wagner parsimony. The resulting cladogram dividedStylosanthes into four separate clades, which comprised: (i) theS. guianensis complex and related species (i.e.S. gracilis, S. grandifolia andS. montevidensis); (ii)S. hispida, tetraploidS. hamata s. l.,S. sympodialis, S. humilis, S. leiocarpa, S. angustifolia and certain accesions ofS. scabra; (iii)S. calcicola, S. viscosa, diploidS. hamata s. str., andS. fruticosa, plus accessions ofS. scabra, S. capitata and one accession ofS. grandifolia; and (iv)S. macrocephala and other accessions ofS. capitata not included within clade 3. Results are generally congruent with previously established interspecific relationships and, moreover, enabled identification of putative maternal progenitors for four tetraploid taxa:S. humilis was identified as a likely maternal parent of bothS. sympodialis andS. hamata s. l.,S. viscosa as a maternal parent ofS. scabra, andS. macrocephala as a maternal parent ofS. capitata.

Key words

Leguminosae Stylosanthes Chloroplast DNA RFLPs phylogeny systematics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baum, B. R., 1992: Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference and the desirability of combining gene trees. — Taxon41: 3–10.Google Scholar
  2. Bremer, K., 1988: The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. — Evolution42: 795–803.Google Scholar
  3. Bremer, B., 1991: Restriction data from chloroplast DNA for phylogenetic reconstruction: is there only one accurate way of scoring? — Pl. Syst. Evol.175: 39–54.Google Scholar
  4. Burt, R. L., 1984: Natural variation inStylosanthes. — InStace, H. M., Edye, L. A., (Eds): The biology and agronomy ofStylosanthes, pp. 103–124. — London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. —, 1971: Numerical analysis of variation patterns in the genusStylosanthes, as an aid to plant introduction and assessment. — Austral. J. Agric. Res.25: 559–575.Google Scholar
  6. —, —, —, 1974: Small sward testing ofStylosanthes in northern Australia. — Austral. J. Agric. Res.25: 559–575.Google Scholar
  7. Caputo, P., Stevenson, D. W., Wurtzel, E. T., 1991: A phylogenetic analysis of AmericanZamiaceae (Cycadales) using chloroplast DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms. — Brittonia73: 135–145.Google Scholar
  8. Clegg, M. T., Zurawski, G., 1992: Chloroplast DNA and the study of plant phylogeny: present status and future prospects. — InSoltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics of plants, pp. 1–13. — New York, London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Coates, D., Cullis, C. A., 1987: Chloroplast DNA variability amongLinum species. — Amer. J. Bot.74: 260–268.Google Scholar
  10. Costa, N. M. S., Ferreira, M. B., 1984: Some Brazilian species ofStylosanthes. — InStace, H. M., Edye, L. A., (Eds): The biology and agronomy ofStylosanthes, pp. 49–72. — London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Curtis, M. D., Cameron, D. F., Manners, J. M., 1995: Molecular evidence that diploidStylosanthes humilis and diploidStylosanthes hamata are progenitors of allotetraploidStylosanthes hamata cv. Verano. — Genome38: 344–348.Google Scholar
  12. Dillon, M. O., 1980: Flora of Panama. 42.Stylosanthes. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.67: 722–776.Google Scholar
  13. Doebley, J., 1989: Molecular evidence for a missing wild relative of maize and the introgression of its chloroplast genome intoZea perennis. — Evolution43: 1555–1559.Google Scholar
  14. —, 1992: Chloroplast DNA variation and the phylogeny ofHordeum (Poaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.79: 576–584.Google Scholar
  15. Doyle, J. J., Doyle, J. L., Brown, A. H. D., 1990: Multiple origins of polyploids in the B genome ofGlycine subgenusGlycine (Leguminosae). — Amer. J. Bot.77: 772–782.Google Scholar
  16. Dorado, O., Rieseberg, L. H., Arias, D. M., 1991: Chloroplast DNA introgression in Southern California sunflowers. — Evolution46: 566–572.Google Scholar
  17. Edye, L. A., 1987: Potential ofStylosanthes for improving tropical grasslands. — Outlook Agric.16: 124–130.Google Scholar
  18. Feinberg, A. P., Vogelstein, B., 1983: A technique for radiolabelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. — Analytical Biochem.132: 6–13.Google Scholar
  19. Ferreira, M. B., Costa, N. M. S., 1979: O generoStylosanthes Sw. no Brasil. — EPAMIG Belo Horizonte.Google Scholar
  20. Gardener, C. J., 1984: The dynamics ofStylosanthes pastures. — InStace, H. M., Edye, L. A., (Eds): The biology and agronomy ofStylosanthes, pp. 333–358. — London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gillard, P., Winter, W. H., 1984: Animal production fromStylosanthes based pastures in Australia. — InStace, H. M., Edye, L. A., (Eds): The biology and agronomy ofStylosanthes, pp. 405–432. — London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gillies, A. C. M., 1994: Molecular analysis of genetic diversity and evolutionary relationships in the tropical legume genusStylosanthes (Aubl.)Sw. — Ph.D. Thesis, University of St. Andrews.Google Scholar
  23. Glover, B. J., Gillies, A. C. M., Abbott, R. J., 1994: Use of the polymerase chain reaction to investigate the delimitation of two agronomically important species ofStylosanthes (Aubl.)Sw. — Bot. J. Scotland47: 83–96.Google Scholar
  24. Harris, S. A., Ingram, R., 1991: Chloroplast DNA and biosystematics: the effect of intraspecific diversity and plastid transmission. — Taxon40: 393–412.Google Scholar
  25. —, —, 1992: Molecular systematics of the genusSenecio L. II. The origin ofS. vulgaris L. — Heredity69: 112–121.Google Scholar
  26. —, 1994: A phylogenetic analysis ofLeucaena (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.19: 1–26.Google Scholar
  27. Kazan, K., Manners, J. M., Cameron, D. F., 1993a: Genetic variation in agronomically important species ofStylosanthes determined using random amplified polymorphic markers. — Theor. Appl. Genet.85: 882–888.Google Scholar
  28. —, —, —, 1993b: Inheritance of random amplified polymorphic markers in an inter-specific cross in the genusStylosanthes. — Genome36: 50–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. —, —, —, 1993c: Genetic relationships and variation in theStylosanthes guianensis (Aubl.)Sw. species complex assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. — Genome36: 43–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kirkbride, J. H., Kirkbride, C. G., 1987: Typification ofStylosanthes (Leguminosae) and its sections. — Taxon36: 455–458.Google Scholar
  31. Lazier, J. R., 1984: Global adventures inStylosanthes IV: West Africa. — InStace, H. M., Edye, L. A., (Eds): The biology and agronomy ofStylosanthes, pp. 503–528. — London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lewis, G., 1987: Legumes from Bahia. — Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
  33. Mannetje, L. 'T, 1969:Rhizobium affinities and phenetic relationships within the genusStylosanthes. — Austral. J. Bot.17: 553–564.Google Scholar
  34. —, 1977: A revision of varieties ofStylosanthes guianensis (Aubl.)Sw. — Austral. J. Bot.25: 347–362.Google Scholar
  35. —, 1984: Considerations on the taxonomy of the genusStylosanthes. — InStace, H. M., Edye, L. A., (Eds): The biology and agronomy ofStylosanthes, pp. 1–23. — London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mohlenbrock, R. H., 1957: A revision of the genusStylosanthes. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.44: 299–355.Google Scholar
  37. Moretti, A., Caputo, P., Cozzolino, S., de Luca, P., Gaudio, L., Siniscalco Gigliano, G., Stevenson, D. W., 1993: A phylogenetic analysis ofDioon (Zamiaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.80: 2204–2214.Google Scholar
  38. Olmstead, R. G., Palmer, J. D., 1994: Chloroplast DNA systematics—a review of methods and data analysis. — Amer. J. Bot.81: 1205–1224.Google Scholar
  39. Palmer, J. D., 1986: Isolation and structural analysis of chloroplast DNA. — Meth. Enzymol.118: 167–186.Google Scholar
  40. —, 1987: Chloroplast DNA evolution and biosystematic uses of chloroplast DNA variation. — Amer. Naturalist.130: 456–529.Google Scholar
  41. —, 1988: Chloroplast DNA variation and plant phylogeny. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1180–1206.Google Scholar
  42. —, 1983: Chloroplast DNA and the origin of amphidiploidBrassica species. — Theor. Appl. Genet.65: 181–189.Google Scholar
  43. —, 1982: Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships inLycopersicon. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA79: 55006–5010.Google Scholar
  44. Potter, D., Doyle, J. J., 1994: Phylogeny and systematics ofSphenostylis andNesphostylis (Leguminosae: Phaseoleae) based on morphological and chloroplast DNA data. — Syst. Bot.19: 389–406.Google Scholar
  45. Rieseberg, L. H., Brunsfeld, S. J., 1992: Molecular evidence and plant introgression. — InSoltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics of plants, pp. 151–176. — London, New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  46. —, 1991: Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. — Evol. Trends Pl.5: 65–84.Google Scholar
  47. Robinson, P. J., Megarrity, R. G., 1975: Characterisation ofStylosanthes introductions by using seed protein patterns. — Austral. J. Agric. Res.26: 467–479.Google Scholar
  48. Schultze-Kraft, R., Costa, N. M. S., Flores, A., 1984:Stylosanthes macrocephala M. B. Ferr etS. Costa—collection and preliminary agronomic evaluation of a new tropical pasture legume. — Trop. Agric. (Trinidad)61: 230–240.Google Scholar
  49. Smith, R. L., Sytsma, K. J., 1990: Evolution ofPopulus nigra (Sect.Aigeiros) introgressive hybridisation and the chloroplast contribution ofPopulus alba (Sect.Populus). — Amer. J. Bot.77: 1176–1187.Google Scholar
  50. Soltis, P. S., Doyle, J. J., Soltis, D. E., 1992: Molecular data and polyploid evolution in plants. — InSoltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics of plants, pp. 177–201. — London, New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  51. Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., 1989: Allopolyploid speciation inTragopogon: insights from chloroplast DNA. — Amer. J. Bot.76: 1119–1124.Google Scholar
  52. Southern, E. M., 1975: Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. — J. Molec. Biol.98: 503–517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Stace, H. M., 1981: Breeding systems and species relationships inStylosanthes. — In: CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Annual Report, p. 36.Google Scholar
  54. —, 1982: Breeding systems inStylosanthes I. Observations of outcrossing inS. scabra at an alcohol dehydrogenase locus. — Austral. J. Agric. Res.33: 87–96.Google Scholar
  55. —, 1984: Cytogenetics and the evolution ofStylosanthes. — InStace, H. M., Edye, L. A., (Eds): The biology and agronomy ofStylosanthes, pp. 50–72. — London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  56. —, —, 1987: Cytogenetic reviews of taxa inStylosanthes hamata sensu lato. — Trop. Grasslands21: 182–188.Google Scholar
  57. Sutherst, R. W., Jones, R. J., Schnitzerling, H. J., 1982: Tropical legumes of the genusStylosanthes immobilize and kill cattle ticks. — Nature295: 320–321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. —, 1988: A survey of the ability of tropical legumes in the genusStylosanthes to trap larvae of the cattle tick,Boophilus microplus. — Austral. J. Exp. Agric.28: 473–479.Google Scholar
  59. Swartz, O., 1788: Prod. Veg. Ind. Occ. 108.Google Scholar
  60. Swofford, D. L., 1993: PAUP—Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign USA.Google Scholar
  61. —, 1990: Phylogeny construction. — InHillis, D. M., Moritz, C., (Eds): Molecular systematics, pp. 411–501. — Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  62. Sytsma, K. J., Schaal, B. A., 1985: Phylogenetics of theLisianthus skinneri (Gentianaceae) species complex in Panama utilising DNA restriction fragment analysis. — Evolution39: 594–608.Google Scholar
  63. Thomas, D., 1984: Global adventures inStylosanthes I: South America. — InStace, H. M., Edye, L. A., (Eds): The biology and agronomy ofStylosanthes, pp. 451–466. — London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  64. Vogel, J. R. T., 1838: de Hedysareis Brasiliae. — Linnaea12: 63–71.Google Scholar
  65. Waugh, R., van de Ven, G. T. W., Phillips, M. S., Powell, W., 1990: Chloroplast DNA diversity in the genusRubus (Rosaceae) revealed by Southern hybridisation. — Pl. Syst. Evol.37: 221–244.Google Scholar
  66. Wendel, J. F., Stewart, J. McD., Rettig, J. H., 1991: Molecular evidence for homoploid reticulate evolution among Australian species ofGossypium. — Evolution45: 694–711.Google Scholar
  67. Whittemore, A. T., Schaal, B. A., 1991: Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA88: 2540–2544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Williams, R. J., Reid, R., Schultze-Kraft, R., Sousa Costa, N. M., Thomas, B. D., 1984: Natural distribution ofStylosanthes. — InStace, H. M., Edye, L. A., (Eds): The biology and agronomy ofStylosanthes, pp. 73–102. — London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  69. Wolfe, P. G., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., 1990: Chloroplast DNA and allozyme variation in diploid and autotetraploidHeuchera grossulariifolia (Saxifragaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.77: 232–244.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda C. M. Gillies
    • 1
  • Richard J. Abbott
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Terrestrial EcologyBush EstatePenicuik, MidlothianScotland, UK
  2. 2.School of Biological and Medical Sciences, Sir Harold Mitchell BuildingUniversity of St. AndrewsSt. Andrews, FifeScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations