Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 333–380 | Cite as

Comparatives, superlatives, and resolution

  • Jean Mark Gawron
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4(2), 159–219.Google Scholar
  2. Bresnan, J.: 1973, ‘Syntax of the Comparative Clause Construction in English’,Linguistic Inquiry 4(2), 275–343.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N.: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, R.: 1975,Montague's Semantic Theory and Transformational Syntax, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  5. Cresswell, M. J.: 1976, ‘The Semantics of Degree’, in B. Partee (ed.),Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Dalrymple, M., S. Shieber, and F. Pereira: 1991, ‘Ellipsis and Higher-Order Unification’,Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 399–452.Google Scholar
  7. Gawron, Jean Mark: 1992, ‘Focus and Ellipsis in Comparatives and Superlatives: A Case Study’, in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.),SALT II: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
  8. Geach, P.: 1962,Reference and Generality, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  9. Keenan, Edward L. and L. Moss: 1984, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and the Expressive Power of Natural Language’, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.),Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Krifka, M.: 1987, Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution: Towards a Semantics of Quantity. Technical Report 17, Forschungsstelle für natursprachliche Systeme, Universität Tubingen.Google Scholar
  11. Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  12. Montague, R.: 1974,Formal Philosophy, R. H. Thomason (ed.), Yale, New Haven.Google Scholar
  13. Nerbonne, J.: 1991, ‘Nominal Comparatives and Generalized Quantifiers’, manuscript, DFKI, Saarbrucken.Google Scholar
  14. Pulman, S.: 1991, ‘Comparatives and Ellipsis’,Proceedings of European ACL.Google Scholar
  15. Pulman, S.: 1992, ‘Higher Order Unification and the Semantics of Focus’, manuscript, SRI International, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Rayner, M. and A. Banks: 1990, ‘An Implementable Semantics for Comparative Constructions’,Computational Linguistics 16, 86–112.Google Scholar
  17. Rooth, M.: 1985, ‘Association with Focus’, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  18. Rooth, M.: 1992, ‘A Theory of Focus Interpretation,’Natural Language Semantics 1(1), 75–116.Google Scholar
  19. Ross, J. R.: 1967,Constraints on Variables in Syntax, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
  20. Sag, I.: 1976,Deletion and Logical Form, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  21. Szabolsci, A.: 1986, ‘Comparative Superlatives’, in N. Fukui, T. Rappoport and E. Sagey (eds.),MIT Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 8, MIT, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
  22. Taglicht, J.: 1984,Message and Emphasis, Longman, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Mark Gawron
    • 1
  1. 1.SRI International EK 282Menlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations