Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 159–220 | Cite as

Attitudinal opacity

  • Philip L. Peterson


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alston, W.: 1986, ‘Quine on Meaning’, in Hahn and Schilpp (eds.), pp. 49–72.Google Scholar
  2. Belnap, N.: 1970, ‘Conditional Assertion and Restricted Quantification’,Nous 4, 1–12.Google Scholar
  3. Dunn, J. M.: 1970, ‘Comments on Belnap’,Nous 4, 13.Google Scholar
  4. Hahn, L. and Schlipp, P. (eds.): 1986,The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, Open Court.Google Scholar
  5. Kaplan, D.: 1969, ‘Quantifying in’, in Davidson, D. and Hintikka, J. (eds.),Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, D. Reidel, pp. 206–242.Google Scholar
  6. Kaplan, D.: 1986, ‘Opacity’, in Hahn and Schilpp (eds.), pp. 229–288.Google Scholar
  7. Kaplan, D.: 1989, ‘Demonstratives’, in Almog, Parry, and Wettstein (eds.),Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kripke, S.: 1980,Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. McKay, T.: 1981, ‘On Proper Names in Belief Descriptions’,Philosophical Studies 39, 287–303.Google Scholar
  10. Palacas, A.: 1977, ‘Specificness in Generative Grammar’, in Hopper, Paul (ed.),Studies in Descriptive and Historical Linguistics: Festschrift for W. P. Lehmann, J. Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. Peterson, P. L.: 1975, ‘On the Logical Representation of Specific Noun Phrases’, inProceedings of the 5th International Congress on Logic, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science, Preprinted Volume, pp. XI 23–24, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
  12. Peterson, P. L.: 1976a, ‘An Abuse of Terminology: Donnellan's Distinction in Recent Grammar’,Foundations of Language 14, 239–242.Google Scholar
  13. Peterson, P. L.: 1976b, ‘On Specific Reference’,Semantikos 1(3), 63–81.Google Scholar
  14. Peterson, P. L.: 1981, ‘Philosophy of Language’,Social Research 47(4), 749–774.Google Scholar
  15. Peterson, P. L.: 1982, ‘Anaphoric Reference to Facts, Propositions, and Events’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 235–276.Google Scholar
  16. Peterson, P. L.: 1985, ‘Substituting in’, Read to American Philosophical Association, Washington, D. C., December 28, 1985. Abstract inProceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 59(2), 349.Google Scholar
  17. Peterson, P. L.: 1988, ‘Syllogistic Logic and the Grammar of some English Quantifiers’, Indiana University Linguistics Club Publications, May.Google Scholar
  18. Peterson, P. L.: 1990, Critical Review ofAn Essay on Facts by K. R. Olson,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50, 610–615.Google Scholar
  19. Peterson, P. L.: 1991, ‘Attitudinal Opacity and the Converse of Kaplan's Quine's Theorem’, Read to Séminaire de Logique et d'Epistémologie, Université de Liège, April 19, CREA, École Polytechnique Paris, May 21, and Centrum voor Logica, Filosofie van de Wetenschappen en Taalfilosofie, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, June 7.Google Scholar
  20. Peterson, P. L.: forthcoming, ‘How canPropositions be Empirically Necessary?’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Google Scholar
  21. Peterson, P. L. and Wali, K.: 1985, ‘Event’,Linguistic Analysis,59(2), 3–18.Google Scholar
  22. Quine, W. V.: 1985, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, in hisThe Ways of Paradox, Random House, pp. 183–194.Google Scholar
  23. Quine, W. V.: 1960,Word and Object, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Quine, W. V.: 1981, ‘Intensions Revisted’, in hisTheories and Things, Harvard University Press, pp. 113–123.Google Scholar
  25. Quine, W. V.: 1986, ‘Reply to David Kaplan’, in Hahn and Schilpp (eds.), pp. 290–294.Google Scholar
  26. Russell, B.: 1961, ‘What I Believe’, 1925. Reprinted as Chapter 43, pp. 367–390, in Egner and Denonn (eds.),The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  27. Sosa, E.: 1970, ‘Propositional AttitudesDe Dicto andDe Re’,Journal of Philosophy 67, 883–896.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip L. Peterson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Hoger Instituut voor WijsbegeerteKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophySyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations