Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 210, Issue 1–2, pp 87–103

The potential of AFLPs in biosystematics: A first application inSolanum taxonomy(Solanaceae)

  • Jouke P. Kardolus
  • Herman J. van Eck
  • Ronald G. van den Berg
Article

Abstract

Using the AFLP technique highly informative DNA fingerprints were generated from 19 taxa ofSolanum sect.Petota (potatoes) and three taxa ofSolanum sect.Lycopersicum (tomatoes). Both phenetic and cladistic analyses were conducted from the individual genotypic level to the species level. An AFLP fingerprint, using a combination of suitable AFLP primers, generated 12 to 71 scorable fragments per genotype which was sufficient for taxonomic interpretation. The classifications based on the molecular markers were generally in agreement with current taxonomic opinions. Unexpectedly,S. microdontum was associated with ser.Megistacroloba rather than with ser.Tuberosa, andS. demissum (ser.Demissa) and species of ser.Acaulia appeared closely affiliated. AFLP is an efficient and reliable technique to generate biosystematic data and therefore a promising tool for evolutionary studies.

Key words

Solanaceae Solanum AFLP markers DNA fingerprinting phylogeny polyploids potato tomato 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bachmann, K., 1992: Nuclear DNA markers in angiosperm taxonomy. — Acta Bot. Neerl.41: 369–384.Google Scholar
  2. —, 1995: Progress and pitfalls in systematics: cladistics, DNA and morphology. — Acta Bot. Neerl.44: 403–419.Google Scholar
  3. Ballvora, A., Hesselbach, J., Niewöhner, J., Leister, D., Salamini, F., Gebhardt, C., 1995: Marker enrichment and high-resolution map of the segment of potato chromosome VII harbouring the nematode resistance geneGro1. — Molec. Gen. Genet.249: 82–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamberg, J. B., Martin, M. W., 1993: Inventory of tuber-bearingSolanum species. Catalog of potato germplasm. — Potato Introduction Station, NRSP-6, Sturgeon Bay, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, J., Vos, P., Kuiper, M., Salamini, F., Heun, M., 1995: Combined mapping of AFLP and RFLP markers in barley. — Molec. Gen. Genet.249: 65–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernatzky, R., Tanksley, S. D., 1986: Genetics of actin regulated sequences in tomato. — Theor. Appl. Genet.72: 314–321.Google Scholar
  7. Camadro, E. L., Masuelli, R. W., Cortés, M. C., 1992: Haploids of the wild tetraploid potatoSolanum acaule ssp.acaule: generation, meiotic behavior, and electrophoretic pattern for the aspartate aminotransferase system. — Genome35: 431–453.Google Scholar
  8. Chase, M. W., Soltis, D. E., Olmstead, R. G., Morgan, D., Les, D. H., Mishler, B. D., Duvall, M. R., Price, R. A., Hills, H. G., Qiu, Y.-L., Kron, K. A., Rettig, J. H., Conti, E., Palmer, J. D., Manhart, J. R., Sytsma, K. J., Michaels, H. J., Kress, W. J., Karol, K. G., Clark, W. D., Hedren, M., Gaut, B. S., Jansen, R. K., Kim, K.-J., Wimpee, C. F., Smith, J. F., Furnier, G. R., Straus, S. H., Xiang, Q., Plunkett, G. M., Soltis, P. S., Swenson, S. M., Williams, S. E., Gadek, P. A., Quinn, C. J., Eguiarte, L. E., Golenberg, E., Learn, G. H., Graham, S. W., Barrat, S. C. H., Dayanandan, S., Albert, V. A., 1993: Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid generbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 528–580.Google Scholar
  9. Child, A., 1990: A synopsis ofSolanum subgenusPotatoe (G. Don)D'Arcy (Tuberarium (Dunal)Bitter (s. l.)). — Feddes Repert.101: 209–235.Google Scholar
  10. Correll, D. S., 1962: The potato and its wild relatives. — Renner: Texas Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Debener, T., Salamini, F., Gebhardt, C., 1990: Phylogeny of wild and cultivatedSolanum species based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs). — Theor. Appl. Genet.79: 360–368.Google Scholar
  12. Dice, L. R., 1945: Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. — Ecology26: 297–302.Google Scholar
  13. Farris, J. S., 1970: Methods for computing Wagner trees. — Syst. Zool.19: 83–92.Google Scholar
  14. Felsenstein, J., 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using bootstrap. — Evolution39: 783–791.Google Scholar
  15. Folkertsma, R. T., Rouppe van der Voort, J. N. A. M., De Groot, K. E., Van Zandvoort, P. M., Schots, A., Gommers, F. J., Helder, J., Bakker, J., 1996: Gene pool similarities of potato cyst nematode populations assessed by AFLP analysis. — Molec. Pl.-Microbe Interact.9: 47–54.Google Scholar
  16. Giannattasio, R. B., Spooner, D. M., 1994: A reexamination of species boundaries betweenSolanum megistacrolobum andSolanum toralapanum (Solanum sect.Petota, ser.Megistacroloba): morphological data. — Syst. Bot.19: 89–105.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkes, J. G., 1962: The origin ofSolanum juzepczukii Buk. andSolanum curtilobum Juz. etBuk. — Z. Pflanzenzücht.47: 1–14.Google Scholar
  18. —, 1990: The potato: evolution, biodiversity and genetic resources. — London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hosaka, K., Ogihara, Y., Matsubayashi, M., Tsunewaki, K., 1984: Phylogenetic relationship between the tuberousSolanum species as revealed by restriction endonuclease analysis of chloroplast DNA. — Jap. J. Genet.59: 349–369.Google Scholar
  20. Huys, G., Coopman, R., Janssen, P., Kersters, K., 1996: High-resolution genotypic analysis of the genusAeromonas by AFLP fingerprinting. — Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.46: 572–580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Janssen, P., Coopman, R., Huys, G., Swings, J., Bleeker, M., Vos, P., Zabeau, M., Kersters, K., 1996: Evaluation of the DNA fingerprinting method AFLP as a new tool in bacterial taxonomy. — Microbiology142: 1881–1893.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kardolus, J. P., 1997: Morphological variation within ser.Acaulia (Solanum sect.Petota).— InNee, M., Simon D., Jessop, J. P., (Eds):Solanaceae IV: progress in biology and utilisation. — Richmond: Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, (in press).Google Scholar
  23. Lindhout, P., Pet, G., Van der Beek, H., 1994: Screening wildLycopersicon species for resistance to powdery mildew (Oidium lycopersicum). — Euphytica72: 43–49.Google Scholar
  24. Marks, G. E., 1955: Cytogenetic studies in tuberousSolanum species. I. Genomic differentiation in the groupDemissa. — J. Genet.53: 262–269.Google Scholar
  25. —, 1965: Cytogenetic studies in tuberousSolanum species. III. Species relationships in some South and Central American species. — New Phytol.64: 293–306.Google Scholar
  26. Matsubayashi, M., 1991: Phylogenetic relationships in the potato and its related species. — InTsuchiya, T., Gupta, P. K., (Eds): Chromosome engineering in plants: genetics, breeding, evolution. Part B, pp. 93–118. — Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  27. McDade, L., 1990: Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics. I. Patterns of character expression in hybrids and their implications for cladistic analysis. — Evolution44: 1685–1700.Google Scholar
  28. Meksem, K., Leister, D., Peleman, J., Zabeau, M., Salamini, F., Gebhardt, C., 1995: A high-resolution map of the vicinity of theR1 locus on chromosome V of potato based on RFLP and AFLP markers. — Molec. Gen. Genet.249: 74–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, J. T., Van den Berg, R. G., Ugarte, M. L., Kardolus, J. P., Villand, J., Spooner, D. M., 1996: Morphological and molecular systematics of the wild potatoSolanum brevicaule complex — Amer. J. Bot.83: 179 (abstract).Google Scholar
  30. Mueller, U. G., Lipari, S. E., Milgroom, M. G., 1996: Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) fingerprinting of symbiotic fungi cultured by the fungusgrowing antCyphomyrmex minutus. — Molec. Ecol.5: 119–122.Google Scholar
  31. Olmstead, R. G., Palmer, J. D., 1994: Chloroplast DNA systematics: a review of methods and data analysis. — Amer. J. Bot.81: 1205–1224.Google Scholar
  32. Rohlf, F. J., 1993: NTSYS-PC. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 1.80. — New York: Applied Biostatistics Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Rouppe van der Voort, J. N. A. M., Van Zandvoort, P. M., Van Eck, H. J., Folkertsma, R. T., Hutten, R. C. B., Draaistra, J., Gommers, F. J., Jacobsen, E., Helder, J., Bakker, J., 1997: Use of allele specificity of comigrating AFLP markers to align genetic maps from different potato genotypes. — Molec. Gen. Genet.255: 438–447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmiediche, P. E., Hawkes, J. G., Ochoa, C. M., 1982: The breeding of the cultivated potato speciesS. ×juzepczukii andS. ×curtilobum. II. The resynthesis ofS. ×juzepczukii andS. ×curtilobum. — Euphytica31: 695–707.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, J. J., Scott-craig, J. S., Leadbetter, J. R., Bush, G. L., Roberts, D. L., Fulbright, D. W., 1994: Characterization of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) products fromXanthomonas campestris and some comments on the use of RAPD products in phylogenetic analysis. — Molec. Phylogenet. Evol.3: 135–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., 1992: Molecular systematics of plants. — New York, London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Spooner, D. M., Sytsma, K. J., Conti, E., 1991: Chloroplast DNA evidence for genome differentiation in wild potatoes (Solanum sect.Petota:Solanaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.78: 1354–1366.Google Scholar
  38. —, 1993: Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes, and pepinos (Solanaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.80: 676–688.Google Scholar
  39. —, 1995: Examination of species boundaries ofSolanum seriesDemissa and potentially related species in ser.Acaulia and ser.Tuberosa (sect.Petota). — Syst. Bot.20: 295–314.Google Scholar
  40. —, 1996: Comparison of four molecular markers in measuring relationships among the wild potato relativesSolanum sectionEtuberosum (subgenusPotatoe). — Theor. Appl. Genet.92: 532–540.Google Scholar
  41. Swofford, D. L., 1993: PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Computer program. — Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.Google Scholar
  42. Ugent, D., 1966: Hybrid weed complexes inSolanum, sectionTuberarium. — Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Van den Berg, R. G., Groendijk-Wilders, N., 1997: Numerical analysis of the taxa ofCircaeifolia (Solanum sect.Petota). — InNee, M., Simon, D., Jessop, J. P., (Eds):Solanaceae IV: progress in biology and utilisation. — Richmond: Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, (in press).Google Scholar
  44. —, 1996: The wild ancestors of cultivated potato: the brevicaulecomplex. — Acta Bot. Neerl.45: 157–171.Google Scholar
  45. Van Eck, H. J., Rouppe van der Voort, J., Draaistra, J., Van Zandvoort, P., Van Enckevort, E., Segers, B., Peleman, J., Jacobsen, E., Helder, J., Bakker, J., 1995: The inheritance and chromosomal localization of AFLP markers in a non-inbred potato offspring. — Molec. Breeding1: 397–410.Google Scholar
  46. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., Frijters, A., Pot, J., Peleman, J., Kuiper, M., Zabeau, M., 1995: AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. — Nucl. Acids Res.23: 4407–4414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Whitkus, R., Doebley, J., Wendel, J. F., 1994: Nuclear DNA markers in systematics and evolution. — InPhillips, R. L., Vasil, I. K., (Eds): DNA-based markers in plants, pp. 118–141. — Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, C. E., St. Clair, D. A., 1993: Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of cultivated and wild accessions ofLycopersicon esculentum. — Genome36: 619–630.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jouke P. Kardolus
    • 1
  • Herman J. van Eck
    • 2
  • Ronald G. van den Berg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant TaxonomyWageningen Agricultural UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Plant BreedingWageningen Agricultural UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations