Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 212, Issue 1–2, pp 23–32 | Cite as

Possible consequences of absence of “jupiters” in planetary systems

  • George W. Wetherill


The formation of the gas giant planets Jupiter and Saturn probably required the growth of massive ∼ 15 Earth-mass cores on a time scale shorter than the ∼ 107 time scale for removal of nebular gas. Relatively minor variations in nebular parameters could preclude the growth of full-size gas giants even in systems in which the terrestrial planet region is similar to our own. Systems containing “failed Jupiters,” resembling Uranus and Neptune in their failure to capture much nebular gas, would be expected to contain more densely populated cometary source regions. They will also eject a smaller number of comets into interstellar space. If systems of this kind were the norm, observation of hyperbolic comets would be unexpected. Monte Carlo calculations of the orbital evolution of region of such systems (the Kuiper belt) indicate that throughout Earth history the cometary impact flux in their terrestrial planet regions would be ∼ 1000 times greater than in our Solar System. It may be speculated that this could frustrate the evolution of organisms that observe and seek to understand their planetary system. For this reason our observation of these planets in our Solar System may tell us nothing about the probability of similar gas giants occurring in other planetary systems. This situation can be corrected by observation of an unbiased sample of planetary systems.


Solar System Source Region Minor Variation Earth History Planetary System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold, J.R.: 1965,Astrophys. J.,141, 1536–1556.Google Scholar
  2. Barrow, J.D.: 1988,The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chamberlin, T.C.: 1905,Fundamental problems of geology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Year Book #3 for 1904, 195–234.Google Scholar
  4. Duncan, M., Quinn, T. and Tremaine, S: 1987,Astron. J.,94, 1330–1338.Google Scholar
  5. Duncan, M., Quinn, T. and Tremaine, S.: 1988,Astrophys. J.,328, L69-L73.Google Scholar
  6. Fernandez, J.A. and Ip, W.-H.: 1983,Icarus,54, 377–387.Google Scholar
  7. Fernandez, J.A. and Ip, W.-H.: 1984,Icarus,58, 109–120.Google Scholar
  8. Hayashi, C., Nakazawa, K. and Adachi, I.: 1977,Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan,29, 163–196.Google Scholar
  9. Laskar, J., Joutel, F. and Robutel, P.: 1992, The moon: a climate regulator for the Earth, submitted toNature. Google Scholar
  10. Levison, H.F. and Duncan, M.J.: 1992, The gravitational sculpting of the Kuiper belt, in press,Astrophys. J. Letters. Google Scholar
  11. Lissauer, J.J.: 1987,Icarus,69, 249–265.Google Scholar
  12. Lissauer, J.J., Pollack, J.B., Wetherill, G.W. and Stevenson, D.J.: 1993, submitted toNeptune, D. Cruikshank, ed., University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  13. McGlynn, T.A. and Chapman, R.D.: 1989,Astrophys. J.,346, L105.Google Scholar
  14. Öpik, E.J.: 1951,Proc. Roy. Irish Acad.,54A, 165–199.Google Scholar
  15. Safronov, V.S.: 1969,Evolution of protoplanetary cloud and formation of the Earth and planets, Nauka, Moscow (Translated 1992, NASA TT F-677).Google Scholar
  16. Shoemaker, E.M. and Shoemaker, C.S.: 1993,Program of Conference on Hazards due to Comets and Asteroids, Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  17. Stern, S.A.: 1990,Proc. Astron. Soc. Pap.,102, 793–795.Google Scholar
  18. Weidenschilling, S.J.: 1977,Astrophys. Space Sci.,51, 153–158.Google Scholar
  19. Wetherill, G.W.: 1975,Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 6th, , 1539–1559.Google Scholar
  20. Wetherill, G.W.: 1989,Meteorites,24, 15–22.Google Scholar
  21. Wetherill, G.W.: 1990a,Ann. Rev. Earth Planet Sci.,18, 205–256.Google Scholar
  22. Wetherill, G.W.: 1990b, in: R.L. Newburn, J. Rahe and M. Neugebauer (eds.),Comets in the Post-Halley Era, I.A.U. Coll. 116, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 537–556.Google Scholar
  23. Wetherill, G.W.: 1991,Science,253, 535–538.Google Scholar
  24. Wetherill, G.W.: 1992,Icarus,100, 307–325.Google Scholar
  25. Weissman, P.R.: 1982,Terrestrial impact rates for long- and short-period comets, Geological Implications of Impacts of Large Asteroids and Comets on the Earth, L.T. Silver and P.H. Schultz, eds., 15–24,Geol. Soc. Am. Special Paper 190. Google Scholar
  26. Weissman, P.R: 1990, V.L. Sharpton and P.D. Ward (eds.),The cometary impactor flux at the Earth: Global Catastrophes in Earth History, Geol. Soc. Am. Special Paper 247, pp. 171–180.Google Scholar
  27. Weissman, P.R.: 1990,Nature,344, 825–830.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • George W. Wetherill
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Terrestrial MagnetismCarnegie Institution of WashingtonWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations