Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 222, Issue 1–4, pp 113–132 | Cite as

Pollen viability and longevity: Practical, ecological and evolutionary implications

  • A. Dafni
  • D. Firmage


The present article reviews the various definitions and terminology of pollen viability and longevity as well as the various tests of its assessment. We compare the advantages and the disadvantages of each method and suggest some practical implications as revealed by the extensive data. We recognize eight main hypotheses concerning the ecology and the evolution of pollen longevity and critically evaluated them according to the literature. The hypotheses are grouped as follows: (1) Desiccation risk-carbohydrate content; (2) Pollen packaging; (3) Pollen competitive ability; (4) Pollinator activity-stigma receptivity duration; (5) Self-pollination chance; (6) Pollen exposure schedule; (7) Pollen travel distance, and (8) Pollen removal chance.

Key words

Pollen longevity desiccation viability stigma receptivity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdul-Baki A. A. (1992) Determination of pollen viability in tomatoes. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 117: 473–476.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman J. D. (1986) Mechanisms and evolution of food-deceptive pollination systems in orchids. Lindleyana 1: 108–113.Google Scholar
  3. Adhikaire K. N., Campbell C. G. (1998) Natural outcrossing in buckwheat. Euphytica 102: 233–237.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander M. P. (1969) Differential staining of aborted and non-aborted pollen. Stain Technol. 62: 107–112.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson N. O., Ascher P. D. (1993) Male and female fertility in loosestrife (Lythrum) cultivars. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 118: 851–858.Google Scholar
  6. Asham M., Brown M. S., Kohel R. J. (1965) Evaluation of seven tetrazolium salts as vital pollen stains in cottonGossypium hirsutum L. Crop. Sci. 4: 508–510.Google Scholar
  7. Athwal R. S., Kimber G. (1970) Anther size and pollen longevity in wheat/rye addition lines. Wheat Infor. Ser. 30: 30–32.Google Scholar
  8. Bassani M., Pacini E., Franchi G. G. (1994) Humidity stress in pollen of anemophilous and entomophilous species. Grana 33: 146–150.Google Scholar
  9. Beardsell D. V., Knox R. B., Williams E. G. (1993) Breeding system and reproductive success ofThryptomene calycina (Myrtaceae). Aust. J. Bot. 41: 333–353.Google Scholar
  10. Becker W. A., Ewart L. C. (1990) Pollination, seed set, and pollen tube growth investigation inViola odorata L. Acta Hort. 272: 33–36.Google Scholar
  11. Bernhardt P., Knox R. B., Calder D. M. (1980) Floral biology and self-incompatibility in some Australian mistletoes of the genusAmyema (Loranthaceae). Aust. J. Bot. 28: 437–451.Google Scholar
  12. Bertin R. I. (1988) Paternity in plants. In: Lovett-Doust L., Lovett-Doust, L. (eds.) Plant reproductive ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 30–59.Google Scholar
  13. Brantjes N. B. M. (1983) Regulated pollen issue in Isotoma, Campanulaceae, and evolution of secondary pollen presentation. Acta Bot. Neerl. 32: 213–222.Google Scholar
  14. Buitink J., Walters B., Hoekstra F. A., Crane J. (1996) Storage behavior ofTypha latifolia pollen at low water content: interpretation on the basis of water activity and glass concept. Physiol. Plant 103: 145–153.Google Scholar
  15. Cole F. R., Firmage D. H. (1984) The floral biology ofPlatanthera blephariglottis. Amer. J. Bot. 79: 7–14.Google Scholar
  16. Coppens d'Eeckenbrugge G., Duval M. F., Van Miegroet F. (1993) Fertility and self-incompatibility in the genusAnanas. Acta Hort. 334: 45–51.Google Scholar
  17. Cruzan M. B. (1990) Variation in pollen size, fertilization inability, and post-fertilization siring ability inErythronium grandiflorum. Evolution 44: 843–856.Google Scholar
  18. Dafni A. (1984) Mimicry and deception in pollination. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 259–278.Google Scholar
  19. Dafni A. (1992) Pollination ecology: A practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  20. Demchik S., Day T. A. (1996) Effect of enhanced UV-B radiation on pollen quantity, quality, and seed yield inBrassica rapa (Brassicaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 83: 573–579.Google Scholar
  21. Eisikowitch D., Kevan P. G., Fowle S., Thomas K. (1987) The significance of pollen longevity inAsclepias syriaca under natural conditions. Pollen et Spore 29: 121–128.Google Scholar
  22. Eti S., Paydas S., Küden A. B., Kaska N., Kurnaz S., Ilgin M. (1994) Investigations on the pollen viability, germination capability and the growth of pollen tubes in some selected almond types under Cukurova conditions. Acta Hort. 373: 225–233.Google Scholar
  23. Fernando D. D., Cass D. D. (1997) Development assessment of sexual reproduction inButomus umbellatus (Butomaceae): male reproduction component. Ann. Bot. 80: 449–456.Google Scholar
  24. Firmage D. H., Cole F. R. (1998) Reproductive success and inflorescence size ofCalopogon tuberosus (Orchidaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 75: 1371–1377.Google Scholar
  25. Franchini G. G., Bellani L., Nepi M., Pacini E. (1966) Types of carbohydrates reserves in pollen: Localization, systematic distribution and ecophysiological significance. Flora 191: 143–159.Google Scholar
  26. Fritz S. E., Lukaszewski A. J. (1989) Pollen longevity in wheat rye and Triticale. Plant Breed. 102: 31–34.Google Scholar
  27. Georgieva L. D., Kureleva M. M. (1994) Cytochemical investigation of long-term stored maize pollen. Euphytica 72: 87–94.Google Scholar
  28. Grilli-Caiola M., Brandizzi F. (1997) Pollen-pistil interaction inHermodactylus tuberosus Mill. (Iridaceae). Plant Biosyst. 131: 197–205.Google Scholar
  29. Gudin S., Arene L., Pellegrino C. (1991) Influence of temperature and hygrometry on rose pollen germination. Adv. Hort. Sci. 5: 96–98.Google Scholar
  30. Hanna W. W., Towill L. E. (1995) Long-term pollen storage. Plant Breed. Rev. 13: 179–207.Google Scholar
  31. Harder L. W., Wilson W. G. (1994) Floral evolution and male reproductive success: Optimal dispensing schedule for pollen dispersal by animal-pollinated plants. Evol. Ecol. 8: 542–559.Google Scholar
  32. Hauser E. J. P., Morrison J. H. (1964) The cytochemical reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium as an index of pollen viability. Amer. J. Bot. 51: 748–752.Google Scholar
  33. Herrera C. M. (1982) Seasonal variation in quality of fruits and diffuse coevolution between plants and avian dispensers. Ecology 63: 773–775.Google Scholar
  34. Heslop-Harrison J. (1979) An interpretation of the hydrodynamics of pollen. Amer. J. Bot. 66: 737–743.Google Scholar
  35. Heslop-Harrison J. S. (1992) Pollen capture, adhesion and hydration. In: Cresti M., Tiezzi A. (eds.) Sexual plant reproduction. Springer, Berlin, pp. 81–88.Google Scholar
  36. Heslop-Harrison J. S., Heslop-Harrison Y. (1970) Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence; intracellular hydrolysis of fluoresceine diacetate. Stain Technol. 45: 115–120.Google Scholar
  37. Heslop-Harrison J. S., Heslop-Harrison Y., Shivanna K. R. (1984) The evaluation of pollen quality and a further appraisal of the flourochromatic (FCR) test procedure. Theor. Appl. Gen. 67: 367–375.Google Scholar
  38. Heslop-Harrison J., Heslop-Harrison Y. (1992) Germination of Monocolpate angiosperm pollen: effects of inhibitory factors and the Ca2+-channel blocker, nifedipine. Ann. Bot. 69: 395–403.Google Scholar
  39. Hoc S. P., Agullo M. A., Palacios R. A. (1994) Stylar trimorphism in four functionally andromonoeciousProsopis species (Mimosaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 190: 143–156.Google Scholar
  40. Hoekstra F. A. (1975) Viability of Compositae pollen: Germination in vitro and influence of climatic conditions during dehiscence. Z. Planzenphysiol. 765: 36–43.Google Scholar
  41. Hoekstra F. A., Crowe L. M., Crowe J. H. (1989) Differential dessiccation sensitivity of corn and Pennisetum pollen linked to sucrose content. Pl. Cell Env. 12: 83–91.Google Scholar
  42. Hoekstra F. A., Crowe J. H., Crowe L. M. (1991) Effect of sucrose on phase behavior of membranes in intact pollen ofTypha latifolia L. as measured with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Pl. Physiol. 97: 1073–1079.Google Scholar
  43. Hoekstra F. A., Roekel van T. (1988) Desiccation tolerance ofPapaver dubium L. pollen during its development in the anther. Pl. Physiol. 88: 626–632.Google Scholar
  44. Horn S. P., Clark L. G. (1992) Pollen visibility inChusquea subtessellata (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). Biotropica 4: 577–579.Google Scholar
  45. James E. A., Knox R. B. (1993) Reproductive biology of the Australian species of the genusPandorea (Bignoniaceae). Aust. J. Bot. 341: 611–626.Google Scholar
  46. Johri B. M., Vasil I. K. (1961) Physiology of pollen. Bot. Rev. 27: 325–375.Google Scholar
  47. Jones M. D., Newell L. C. (1948) Longevity of pollen and stigmas of grasses: Buffalo-grass (Buchloe dactyloides Nutt.) Engelm, and corn (Zea mays L). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 40: 195–204.Google Scholar
  48. Juncosa M. A., Webster B. D. (1989) Pollination inLupinus nanus ssplatifolius (Leguminosae). Am. J. Bot. 76: 59–66.Google Scholar
  49. Käpylä M. (1991) Testing the age and viability of airborne pollen. Grana 29: 430–433.Google Scholar
  50. Katiyar R. K., Gupta V. K. (1985) Pollen grain and stigma longevity in turnip rape. Crop. Improv. 12: 18–23.Google Scholar
  51. Kearns C. A., Inouye D. W. (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. Niwot. University Press of Colorado, Colorado.Google Scholar
  52. Khatun S., Flowers T. J. (1995) The estimation of pollen viability in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 46: 151–154.Google Scholar
  53. King J. R. (1960) The peroxidase reaction as an indicator of pollen viability. Stain Tech. 36: 225–227.Google Scholar
  54. Knox R. B., Williams E. G., Dumas C. (1986) Pollen, pistil and reproductive function in crop plants. Pl. Breed. Rev. 5: 14–79.Google Scholar
  55. Koga Y., Akihama T., Fujimaki H., Yokoo M. (1971) Studies on longevity of pollen grains of rice,Oriza sativa L. 1 Morphological change of pollen grains after shedding. Cytologia 36: 104–110.Google Scholar
  56. Kumar A., Chowdhury R. K., Dahiya O. S. (1995) Pollen viability and stigma receptivity in relation to meteorological parameters in pearl millet. Seed Sci. Tech. 23: 147–156.Google Scholar
  57. Lansac A. R., Sullivan C. Y., Johnson B. E., Lee K. W. (1994) Viability and germination of the pollen of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench. Ann. Bot. 74: 27–33.Google Scholar
  58. La Porta N., Roselli G. (1991) Relationship between pollen germination in vitro and fluochromatic reaction in cherry clone F12/1 (Prunus avium L) and some of its mutants. J. Hort. Sci. 56: 171–175.Google Scholar
  59. Lavi V., Sahar N., Barcucis I., Gaash D., Kadman A. (1996) The effect of pollen donors and pollen viability on fruitlet drop inMacadamia integrifolia. Trop. Agric. 73: 249–251.Google Scholar
  60. Lloyd D. G., Yates J. M. A. (1982) Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigmas in hermaphrodite plants, exemplified byWahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanualacea). Evolution 36: 903–913.Google Scholar
  61. Lincoln R. J., Boxshall G. A., Clark P. F. (1982) A dictionary of ecology, evolution and systematics. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  62. Lindgren K., Lindgren D. (1996) Germinability of Norway spruce and Scots pine pollen exposed to open air. Silva Fenn 30: 3–9.Google Scholar
  63. Lindgren D., Paule L., Xihuan S., Yuazdani R., Segerstörm O., Wallin J-E., Lezbro M. L. (1995) Can viable pollen carry Scots pine genes over long distances. Grana 34: 64–69.Google Scholar
  64. Lisci M., Tanda C., Pacini E. (1994) Pollination ecophysiology ofMercurialis annua L (Euphorbiaceae), an anemophilous species flowering all year around. Ann. Bot. 74: 125–135.Google Scholar
  65. Lord E. M. (1980) Cleistogamy: a tool for the study of floral morphogenesis, function and evolution. Bot. Rev. 47: 421–449.Google Scholar
  66. Maguire T. L., Sedgley A. (1997) Genetic diversity inBanksia andDryandra (Proteaceae) with emphasis onBanksia cuneata, a rare and endangered species. Heredity 79: 394–401.Google Scholar
  67. Marcellan O. N., Camadro E. L. (1996) The viability of asparagus pollen after storage at low temperatures. Sci. Hort. 67: 101–104.Google Scholar
  68. McKellar M. A., Quesenberry K. H. (1992) Chromosome pairing and pollen viability inDesmodium ovalifolium Wall ×Desmodium herterocarpon (L) DC Hybrids. Aust. J. Bot. 40: 243–247.Google Scholar
  69. Mione T., Anderson G. J. (1992) Pollen-ovule ratios and breeding system evolution inSolanum sectionBasarthrum (Solanaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 79: 279–287.Google Scholar
  70. Morse D. H. (1987) Roles of pollen and ovary age in follicle production of the common milkweedAsclepias syriaca. Amer. J. Bot. 74: 851–856.Google Scholar
  71. Mulugeta D., Maxwell B. D., Dyer W. D. (1994) Kochia (Kochia scoparia) pollen dispersion, viability and germination. Weed. Sci. 42: 548–552.Google Scholar
  72. Neiland M. R. M., Wilcock C. C. (1995) Maximisation of reproductive success by European Orchideae under conditions of infrequent pollination. Protoplasma 187: 39–48.Google Scholar
  73. Nepi M., Pacini E. (1993) Pollination, pollen viability and pistil receptivity inCucurbita pepo. Ann. Bot. 72: 527–536.Google Scholar
  74. Niesenbaum R. A. (1992) Sex ratio, components of reproduction and pollen deposition inLindera benzoin (Lauraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 79: 495–500.Google Scholar
  75. Nybom H. (1986) Active self-pollination and pollen stainability in someRubus cultivars. J. Hort. Sci. 69: 49–55.Google Scholar
  76. Nyman I. (1992) Pollination mechanisms in sixCampanula species (Campanulaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 188: 97–108.Google Scholar
  77. Oberle G. D., Watson R. (1952) The use of 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride in viability tests of fruit pollens. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 61: 299–303.Google Scholar
  78. Ockendon D. J., Gates P. J. (1976) Reduced pollen viability in the onion (Allium cepa). New Phytol. 76: 511–517.Google Scholar
  79. Pacini E. (1996) Types and meaning of pollen carbohydrate reserves. Sex. Pl. Rep. 9: 362–366.Google Scholar
  80. Pacini E., Franchi G. (1996) Some cytological, ecological and evolutionary aspects of pollination. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 65: 11–16.Google Scholar
  81. Pacini E., Franchi G. G., Lisci M., Nepi M. (1997) Pollen viability related to type of pollination in six angiosperm species. Ann. Bot. 80: 83–87.Google Scholar
  82. Pacini E., Viegi L. (1995) Total polysaccharide content of developing pollen in two angiosperm species. Grana 39: 237–241.Google Scholar
  83. Palfi G., Gulyas S., Rajki E. S., Cseuz L. (1988) The Proline test — a method to the demonstration of the tolerance of water deficiency and of frost — and to the qualification of pollens. Acta Univ. Szeged. Acta Biol. 34: 11–25.Google Scholar
  84. Palfi G., Koves E. (1984) Determination of vitality of pollen on the basis of its amino acid content. Bioch. Physiol. Pfl. 179: 237–240.Google Scholar
  85. Palmer M., Travis J., Antonovics J. (1989) Temporal mechanisms influencing gender expression and pollen flow within a self-compatible perennial,Amianthium muscaetoxicum (Liliaceae). Oecologia 78: 231–236.Google Scholar
  86. Parfitt D. E., Ganeshan S. (1989) Comparison of procedures for estimating viability ofPrunus pollen. Hort. Sci. 24: 354–356.Google Scholar
  87. Pinney K., Polito V. S. (1990) Olive pollen storage and in vitro germination. Acta Hort. 286: 207–209.Google Scholar
  88. Polito V. S., Luza J. G. (1988) Longevity of pistachio pollen determined by in vitro germination. J. Amer. Hort. Soc. 113: 214–217.Google Scholar
  89. Preston R. E. (1991) The intrafloral phenology ofStreptantus tortuosus (Brassicaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 78: 1044–1053.Google Scholar
  90. Proctor H. C. (1998) Effect of pollen age on fruit set, fruit weight, and seed set in three orchid specides. Can. J. Bot. 76: 420–427.Google Scholar
  91. Ramsey M. (1988) Differences in pollinator effectiveness of birds and insects visitingBanksia menziesii (Proteaceae). Oecologia 76: 119–124.Google Scholar
  92. Ramsey M., Vaughlon G. (1991) Self incompatibility, protandry, pollen production and pollen longevity inBanksia menziesii. Aust. J. Bot. 39: 497–504.Google Scholar
  93. Rao G. U., Jain A., Shivanna K. R. (1992) Effects of high temperature stress onBrassica pollen: Viability, germination and ability to set fruits and seeds. Ann. Bot. 68: 193–198.Google Scholar
  94. Rodriguez-Riano T., Dafni A. (2000) A new procedure to assess pollen viability. Sex. Pl. Rep. 12: 242–244.Google Scholar
  95. Roubik D. W. (1989) Ecology and natural history of tropical bees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  96. Sarvella P. (1964) Vital-stain testing of pollen viability in cotton. J. Hered. 55: 154–158.Google Scholar
  97. Sato S., Katho N., Iwai S., Hagimori M. (1998) Establishment of reliable method of in vitro pollen germination and pollen preservation ofBrassica rapa (syn B campestris). Euphytica 103: 29–33.Google Scholar
  98. Sedgley M., Harbard J. (1993) Pollen storage and breeding system in relation to controlled pollination of four species ofAcacia (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Aust. J. Bot. 41: 601–609.Google Scholar
  99. Sedgley M., Griffin A. R. (1989) Sexual reproduction of tree crops. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  100. Shchori Y., Goren T., Ben-Jaacov J. (1992) Pollen germination and storage inBanksia and some other proteaceae plants. Acta Hort. 316: 19–20.Google Scholar
  101. Shivanna K. R., Heslop-Harrison J. (1981) Membrane state and pollen viability. Ann. Bot. 47: 759–770.Google Scholar
  102. Shivanna K. R., Johri B. M. (1989) The angiosperm pollen structure and function. Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  103. Shivanna K. R., Rangaswamy N. S. (1992) Pollen biology — a laboratory manual. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  104. Shukhvibul N., Considine J. A. (1993) Medium and long storage ofAnigozanthos manglesii (D Don) pollen. NZ J. Crop. Hort. Sci. 21: 343–347.Google Scholar
  105. Siddiqui B. A. (1983) Studies on the floral biology and morphology ofRaphanus sativus L. Acta Bot. Ind. 11: 150–154.Google Scholar
  106. Singh M. B., O'Neil P. M., Knox B. (1985) Initiation of postmeioticβ-galactosidase synthesis during microsporogenesis in oilseed rape. Plant Physiol. 77: 225–228.Google Scholar
  107. Smith-Huerta N. L., Vasek F. C. (1984) Pollen longevity and stigma-pre-emption inClarkia. Amer. J. Bot. 71: 1183–1191.Google Scholar
  108. Snow A. A., Spira T. P. (1993) Individual variation in vigor of self pollen and selfed progeny inHibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 80: 160–164.Google Scholar
  109. Speranza A., Calzoni G. L., Pacini E. L. (1997) Occurrence of mono- or disaccharides and polysaccharides reserve in mature pollen grain. Sex. Pl. Rep. 10: 110–115.Google Scholar
  110. Stanley R. G., Linskens H. F. (1974) Pollen: biology, biochemistry and management. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  111. Stephenson A. G., Beritn R. I. (1983) Male competition, female choice, and sexual selection in plants. In: Real L. (ed.) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 109–149.Google Scholar
  112. Stone J. L., Thomson J. D., Dent-Acosta S. J. (1995) Assessment of pollen viability in handpollination experiments: A review. Amer. J. Bot. 82: 1186–1197.Google Scholar
  113. Swartz-Tzachor R. (1999) Pollination and seed production in two populations ofCyclamen persicum. MSc Thesis, Dep. of Botany. Tel-Aviv University.Google Scholar
  114. Tangmitcharoen S., Owens J. N. (1997) Pollen viability and pollen-tube growth following controlled pollination and their relation to low fruit production in teak (Tectona grandis Linn f). Ann. Bot. 80: 401–410.Google Scholar
  115. Thomson J. D., Barrett S. C. H. (1981) Temporal variation of gender inAralia hispida Vent (Araliaceae). Evolution 35: 1094–1107.Google Scholar
  116. Thomson J. D., Rigney L. P., Karoly K. M., Thomson B. A. (1994) Pollen viability, vigor, and competitive ability inErythronium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 81: 1257–1266.Google Scholar
  117. Thomson J. D., Thomson B. A. (1992) Pollen presentation and viability schedules in animalpollinated plants: Consequences for reproductive success. In: Wyatt R. (ed.) Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction: New approaches. Chapman and Hill, New York, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  118. Trognitz B. R. (1991) Comparison of different pollen viability assays to evaluate pollen fertility of potato dihaploids. Euphytica 56: 143–148.Google Scholar
  119. Vaknin Y., Gan-Mor S., Bechar A., Ronen B., Eisikowitch D. (1999) Effect of dilution and desiccation of almond pollen on its viability: implications for pollen supplementation for cultivated crop plants. J. Hort. Biotech. 74: 321–327.Google Scholar
  120. Vallania R., Caramiello R., Miaza L. M., Me G., Gianotti C. (1988) Pollen morphology and viability of threeVitis vinifera Lcultivaro (Dolcetto, Delight, Queen of the Vineyard) and of two Queens of the Vineyards mutants. Contribution No 334 of Centro Miglioramento Genetico e Biologia della Vite, pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
  121. Vassileva R., Lidanski T., Tseckova Z. (1991) Acetocarmine test and pollen vitality in the genusHelianthus. Compt. Rend. de l'Acad. Bulg. Sci. 44: 71–72.Google Scholar
  122. Vaughton G., Ramsey M. (1991) Floral biology and inefficient pollen removal inBanksia spinulosa varNeoangelica (Proteaceae). Aust. J. Bot. 39: 167–77.Google Scholar
  123. Vergano G., Mizja M. L., Me G., Gianotti C., Vallania R. (1994) Vitalita e germinabilita di pollini di diversi fruttiferi dopo crioconservazione. Ital. Hort. 1: 24–29.Google Scholar
  124. Visser T. (1955) Germination and storage of pollen. Meded Landbouwshogesch Wageningen/Nederland 55: 1–68.Google Scholar
  125. Walt van der I. D., Littlejohn G. M. (1996) Storage and viability testing ofProtea pollen. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121: 804–809.Google Scholar
  126. Wyatt R., Brouyles S. B. (1990) Reproductive biology of milkweeds (Asclepias) recent advances. In: Kawano S. (ed.) Biological approaches and evolutionary trends in plants. Academic Press, London, pp. 255–272.Google Scholar
  127. Yeo P. Y. (1993) Secondary pollen presentation: form, function and evolution. Plant Syst. Evol. [Suppl.] 6, Springer, Wien.Google Scholar
  128. Ziestsman P. C. (1991) Reproductive biology ofGrevia occidentalis L (Tiliaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 57: 348–351.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Dafni
    • 1
  • D. Firmage
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Pollination Ecology, Institute of EvolutionUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of BiologyColby CollegeWatervilleUSA

Personalised recommendations