Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 655–675 | Cite as

Performative utterances: A reply to Bach and Harnish

  • Marga Reimer
Remark And Reply

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Performative Utterance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, K. and R. M. Harnish: 1979,Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, K. and R. M. Harnish: 1992, ‘How Performatives Really Work: A Reply to Searle’,Linguistics & Philosophy 15, 93–110.Google Scholar
  3. Harnish, R. M.: 1991,Performatives are Default Reflexive Standardized Indirect Speech Acts, presented at the Budapest Conference on Metapragmatic Terms.Google Scholar
  4. Horn, L.: 1992, ‘The Said and the Unsaid’, in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.),Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory.Google Scholar
  5. Recanati, F.: 1980, ‘Some Remarks on Explicit Performatives, Indirect Speech Acts, Locutionary Meaning and Truth-Value’, in J. Searle et al. (eds.),Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 205–220.Google Scholar
  6. Recanati, F.: 1993,Direct Reference, Basil Blackwell, London, England.Google Scholar
  7. Searle, J.: 1975, ‘Indirect Speech Acts’, in P. Cople and J. Morgan (eds.),Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3. Academic Press, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Searle, J.: 1989, ‘How Performatives Work’,Linguistics & Philosophy 12, 535–558.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marga Reimer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations