Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 267–278 | Cite as

Undergraduate students' perceptions of child sexual abuse: The impact of victim sex, perpetrator sex, respondent sex, and victim response

  • Sylvia Broussard
  • William G. Wagner
  • Richard Kazelskis
Article

Abstract

Written descriptions of sexual interaction between an adult and. a 15-year-old were utilized to study the impact of victim sex, perpetrator sex, respondent sex, and victim response (i.e., encouraging, passive, resisting) on labeling of child sexual abuse, perception of realistic victim behavior, and effect on the child. Results of responses collected from 180 male and 180 female undergraduate students revealed that participants tended to view the interaction of a male victim with a female perpetrator as less representative of child sexual abuse. Respondents also thought that male victims of this interactional pattern would experience less harm than would victims of other interactional types (e.g., female victim-male perpetrator). Findings are discussed with regard to their generalizability and the need for child sexual abuse education programs.

Key words

child sexual abuse definition impact victim perpetrator 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams-Tucker, C. (1982). Proximate effects of sexual abuse in childhood: A report on 28 children.Am. J. Psychiatry 139: 1252–1256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bender, L., and Blau, A. (1937). The reaction of children to sexual relations with adults.Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 7: 500–518.Google Scholar
  3. Brant, R., and Tisza, V. (1977). The sexually misused child.Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 47: 80–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, A., and Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research.Psychological Bull. 99: 66–77.Google Scholar
  5. Cantwell, H. (1981). Sexual abuse of children in Denver, 1979: Reviewed with implications for pediatric intervention and possible prevention.Child Abuse Negl 5: 75–85.Google Scholar
  6. Conte, F., and Schuerman, F. (1987). Factors associated with an increased impact of child sexual abuse.Child Abuse Negl. 11: 201–211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. DeJong, A., Emmett, G., and Hervada, A. (1982). Epidemiologic factors in sexual abuse of boys.Am. J. Dis. Child. 136: 990–993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. DeYoung, M. (1982). Innocent seducer or innocently seduced? The role of the child incest victim.J. Clin. Child Psycol, 11: 56–60.Google Scholar
  9. Ellerstein, N., and Canavan, J. (1980). Sexual abuse of boys.J. Dis. Child. 136: 129–134.Google Scholar
  10. Farber, E., Showers, J., Johnson, C., Joseph, J., and Oshins, L. (1984). The sexual abuse of children: A comparison of male and female victims.J. Clin. Child Psychol. 13: 294–297.Google Scholar
  11. Felice, M., Grant, F., Reynolds, B., Gold, S., Wyatt, M., and Heald, F. (1978). Follow-up observations of adolescent rape victims.Clin. Pediatr, 17: 311–315.Google Scholar
  12. Finkelhor, D. (1979). What's wrong with sex between adults and children?Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 49: 602–697.Google Scholar
  13. Finkelhor, D. (1980). Risk factors in the sexual victimization of children.Child Abuse Negl. 4: 256–273.Google Scholar
  14. Finkelhor, D. (1984). Designing studies on the impact and treatment of child sexual abuse. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  15. Fischer, M. (1983). Adolescent adjustment after incest.School Psychol Int. 4: 217–222.Google Scholar
  16. Friedrich, W., Urquiza, A., and Beilke, R. (1986). Behavior problems in sexually abused young children.J. Pediatr. Psychol. 11: 47–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fritz, G., Stoll, K., and Wagner, N. (1981). A comparison of males and females who were sexually molested as children.J. Sex Marit. Ther. 7: 54–59.Google Scholar
  18. Gomes-Schwartz, B., Horowitz, G., and Saucier, V. (1985). Severity of emotional distress among sexually abused preschool, school age, and adolescent children.Hosp. Commun. Psychiatry 36: 503.Google Scholar
  19. Goodwin, F. (1981). Suicide attempts in sexual abuse victims and their mothers.Child Abuse Negl. 5: 217–221.Google Scholar
  20. Krulewitz, & J., Nash, J. (1979). Effects of rape victim resistance, assault outcome, and sex of observer on attributions about rape.J. Personal. 47: 557–574.Google Scholar
  21. Lukianowicz, N. (1972). Incest: Paternal incest.Brit. J. Psychiatry 120: 310–313.Google Scholar
  22. Nielson, T. (1983). Current perspectives.Personn. Guid. J. 62: 139–142.Google Scholar
  23. Renouf, A., and Goodman, G. (1989, April). A differential analysis of the initial effects of child sexual abuse. Paper presented to the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Kansas City. Mo.Google Scholar
  24. Rogers, C., and Terry, T. (1984). Clinical intervention with boy victims of sexual abuse. In Stuart, I., and Greer, J. (eds.),Victims of Sexual Aggression: Treatment of Children, Women, and Men, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 91–104.Google Scholar
  25. Russell, D. (1983). The incidence and prevalence of intrafamilial and exlrafamilial sexual abuse of female children.Child Abuse Negl. 7: 133–146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Russel, D., and Finkelhor, D. (1984). Women as perpetrators: Review of the evidence. In Finkelhor, D. (ed.),Child Sexual Abuse: New Theory and Practice, The Free Press, New York, pp. 171–185.Google Scholar
  27. Sandfort, T. (1984). Sex in pedophiliac relationships: An empirical investigation among a nonrepresentative group of boys.J. Sex Res. 20: 123–142.Google Scholar
  28. Summit, R. (1983). The child abuse accommodation syndrome.Child Abuse Negl. 7: 177–193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tong, L., Oates, K., and McDowell, M. (1987). Personality development following sexual abuse.Child Abuse Negl. 11: 371–383.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Waterman, C., and Foss-Goodman, D. (1984). Child molesting: Variables relating to attribution of fault to victims, offenders, and nonparticipating parents.J. Sex Res. 20: 329–249.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvia Broussard
    • 1
  • William G. Wagner
    • 1
  • Richard Kazelskis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Counseling PsychologyUniversity of Southern MississippiHattiesburg

Personalised recommendations