Attraction of male beetles to grubs: Evidence for evolution of a sex pheromone from larval odor
- 99 Downloads
- 10 Citations
Abstract
Females of the scarabaeid beetleCyclocephala lurida produce a volatile sex pheromone which attracts conspecific males. Field experiments demonstrated that larvae of both sexes also emit volatile chemicals that stimulate similar responses in adult males, including attempts by the attracted males to mate with the nonreproductive immature stage. Significantly more adult males were caught in traps baited with conspecific male or female larvae or adult females than in blank control traps. Hexane extracts of both male and female grubs were at least as effective as live larvae in trapping male adults, demonstrating that the behavioral responses are mediated by volatile chemicals. Sensory and behavioral responses of males to sex pheromones emitted by adult females are part of the functional communication system. However, their response to grubs is not functional, because grubs are normally temporally and spatially inaccessible to mate-seeking males. In theory, the evolution of a communication system is problematic because it requires the development of a signal in one sex and the sensory and behavioral attributes to respond to that signal in the other sex. The ontogeny of sex pheromone communication inC. lurida suggests a partial solution to this evolutionary problem. We propose that this sex pheromone communication system is probably derived from noncommunicative volatile chemicals that are lost in adult males and retained by adult females.
Key Words
Cyclocephala lurida Coleoptera Scarabaeidae sex pheromone chemical communication evolution of signalsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Gilbert, L.E. 1976. Postmating female odor inHeliconius butterflies: A male-contributed antiaphrodisiac.Science 193:419–420.Google Scholar
- Kittredge, J.S., andTakahashi, F.T. 1972. The evolution of sex pheromone communication in the Arthropoda.J. Theor. Biol. 35:467–471.Google Scholar
- Krebs, J.R., andDawkins, R. 1984. Animal signals: Mind-reading and manipulation, pp. 380–402,in J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies (eds.). Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 2nd ed. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Otte, D. 1974. Effects and functions in the evolution of signaling systems.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:385–417.Google Scholar
- Payne, T.L., Birch, M.C., andKennedy, C.E.J. 1986. Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Potter, D.A. 1980. Flight activity and sex attraction of northern and southern masked chafers in Kentucky turfgrass.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 73:414–417.Google Scholar
- Potter, D.A. 1981. Seasonal emergence and flight of northern and southern masked chafers in relation to air and soil temperature and rainfall patterns.Environ. Entomol. 10:793–797.Google Scholar
- Potter, D.A., Wrensch, D.L., andJohnston, D.E. 1976. Aggression and mating success in male spider mites.Science 193:160–161.Google Scholar
- Ryan, M.J., andWilczynski, W. 1988. Coevolution of sender and receiver: Effect on local mate preference in cricket frogs.Science 240:1786–1788.Google Scholar
- Smith, W.J. 1977. The Behavior of Communicating. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Tamaki, Y. 1985. Sex pheromones, pp. 145–191,in G.A. Kerkut and L.I. Gilbert (eds.). Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology, Vol. 9. Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Tashiro, H. 1987. Turfgrass Insects of the United States and Canada. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- Thornhill, R., andAlcock, J. 1983. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Vanderwel, D., andOehlschlager, A.C. 1987. Biosynthesis of pheromones and endocrine regulation of pheromone production in Coleoptera, pp. 175–215,in G.D. Prestwich and G.J. Blomquist (eds.). Pheromone Biochemistry. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar