Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 15–41 | Cite as

Being liked and teaching: The effects and bases of personal likability in college instruction

  • Seymour W. Uranowitz
  • Kenneth O. DoyleJr.
Article

Abstract

This article gathers together and critically analyzes literature on two sensitive and important questions: First, what effects (if any) does the psychological attractiveness, or personal likability, of college instructors have on student learning? Second, what leads to an instructor's being liked or likable? Review of this literature suggests that personal likability does affect learning in the affective domain, and sometimes also in the cognitive domain. Accordingly, the review also identifies instructor traits and behaviors which influence likability, at least under certain circumstances. Finally, discussion focuses on gaps in this area of knowledge and raises questions that need further empirical or theoretical attention.

Key Words

college instruction instructor likability evaluation of instruction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, S. S., Spear, P. S., and Johnson, J. Experimenter role effects on children's task performance and perception.Child Development 1969,40 1–10.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, N. H. Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968,9 272–279.Google Scholar
  3. Aronson, E., and Cope, V. My enemy's enemy is my friend.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968,8 8–12.Google Scholar
  4. Aronson, E., and Linder, D. Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1965,1 156–171.Google Scholar
  5. Aronson, E., and Mills, J. The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1959,59 177–181.Google Scholar
  6. Aronson, E., Willerman, B., and Floyd, J. The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness.Psychonomic Science 1966,4 227–228.Google Scholar
  7. Aronson, E., and Worchel, P. Similarity versus liking as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness.Psychonomic Science 1966,5 157–158.Google Scholar
  8. Asch, S. E. Forming impressions of personalities.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1946,41 258–290.Google Scholar
  9. Backman, C. W., and Secord, P. F. The effect of perceived liking on interpersonal attraction.Human Relations 1959,12 379–384.Google Scholar
  10. Bales, R. F. Task roles and social roles in problem solving groups. In E. E. Maccoby, E. M. Newcomb, and E. L. Hartley (Eds.),Readings in social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, 1958.Google Scholar
  11. Bales, R. F., and Slater, P. E. Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. In T. Parsons and R. F. Bales (Eds.),The family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1955.Google Scholar
  12. Bejar, I. I., and Doyle, K. O.Student ratings of instruction: Expectations, first impressions, and evaluation. Minneapolis, MN: Measurement Services Center, University of Minnesota, 1975.Google Scholar
  13. Berkowitz, H., and Zigler, E. Effects of preliminary positive and negative interactions and delay conditions on children's responsiveness to social reinforcement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1965,2 500–505.Google Scholar
  14. Berscheid, E. Opinion change and communicator-communicatee similarity and dissimilarity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1966,4 670–680.Google Scholar
  15. Berscheid, E., Graziano, W., Monson, T., and Dermer, M. Outcome dependency: Attention, attribution, and attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976,34 978–989.Google Scholar
  16. Berscheid, E., and Walster, E. H.Interpersonal attraction. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.Google Scholar
  17. Bochner, S. and Insko, C. A. Communicator discrepancy, source credibility, and opinion change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1966,4 614–621.Google Scholar
  18. Brehm, J., and Cole, A. Effect of a favor which reduces freedom.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1966,3 420–426.Google Scholar
  19. Brock, T. E. Communicator-recipient similarity and decision change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1965,1 650–654.Google Scholar
  20. Burnstein, E., and Worchel, P. Arbitrariness of frustration and its consequences for aggression in a social situation.Journal of Personality 1962,30 528–540.Google Scholar
  21. Byrne, D. Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1961,62 713–715.Google Scholar
  22. Byrne, D. Attitudes and attraction. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  23. Byrne, D.The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  24. Byrne, D., and Clore, G. L. Predicting interpersonal attraction toward strangers presented in three different stimulus modes.Psychonomic Science 1966,4 239–240.Google Scholar
  25. Byrne, D., and Clore, G. L. Effectance arousal and attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs, 1967,6 (whole no. 638).Google Scholar
  26. Byrne, D., and Clore, G. L. A reinforcement model of evaluative responses.Personality: An International Journal 1970,1 103–128.Google Scholar
  27. Byrne, D., Clore, G. L., and Worchel, P. The effect of economic similarity—dissimilarity on interpersonal attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1966,4 220–224.Google Scholar
  28. Byrne, D., and Griffitt, W. Similarity versus liking: A clarification.Psychonomic Science 1966,6 295–296.Google Scholar
  29. Byrne, D., Griffitt, W., and Stefaniak, D. Attraction and similarity of personality characteristics.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1967,5 82–90.Google Scholar
  30. Byrne, D., and Nelson, D. Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1965,1 659–663.Google Scholar
  31. Byrne, D., Nelson, D., and Reeves, K. Effects of consensual validation and invalidation on attraction as a function of verifiability.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1966,2 98–107.Google Scholar
  32. Byrne, D., and Rhamey, R. Magnitude of positive and negative reinforcements as a determinant of attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1965,2 884–890.Google Scholar
  33. Byrne, D., and Wong, T. Racial prejudice, interpersonal attraction, and assumed dissimilarity of attitudes.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1962,65 246–253.Google Scholar
  34. Calvin, H. D., Hoffman, F. K., and Harden, E. L. The effect of intelligence and social atmosphere on group problem solving behavior.Journal of Social Psychology 1957,45 61–74.Google Scholar
  35. Carnegie, D.How to win friends and influence people. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1936.Google Scholar
  36. Clore, G. L., and Baldridge, B. Interpersonal attraction: The role of agreement and topic interest.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968,9 340–346.Google Scholar
  37. Cohen, S. H., and Berger, W. G. Dimensions of students' ratings of college instructors underlying subsequent achievement on course examinations.Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 1970,5 605–606.Google Scholar
  38. Coleman, J. S.The adolescent society. New York: Free Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  39. Cooper, J., and Jones, E. E. Opinion divergence as a strategy to avoid being miscast.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969,13 23–30.Google Scholar
  40. Cottrell, N. B. Performance in the presence of other human beings; mere presence, audience, and affiliation effects. In E. C. Simmel, R. A. Hoppe, and G. A. Milton (Eds.),Social facilitation and imitative behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1968.Google Scholar
  41. Darley, J. M., and Berscheid, E. Increased liking as a result of anticipation of personal contact.Human Relations 1967,20 29–40.Google Scholar
  42. Davison, D. C. Perception of instructor in relation to self and evaluation of instructor's performance.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1973,36 533–534.Google Scholar
  43. Day, C. R.Assumed similarity to others: Some determinants and consequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1969.Google Scholar
  44. Deaux, K. To err is humanizing: But sex makes a difference.Representative Research in Social Psychology 1972,3 20–28.Google Scholar
  45. Deutsch, M., and Solomon, L. Reactions to evaluations by others as influenced by self-evaluations.Sociometry 1959,22 93–112.Google Scholar
  46. Dickoff, H.Reactions to evaluations by another person as a function of self-evaluation and the interaction context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke University, 1961.Google Scholar
  47. Doyle, K. O., Jr., and Whitely, S. E. Student ratings as criteria for effective teaching.American Educational Research Journal 1974,11 259–274.Google Scholar
  48. Ehrlich, H. J., and Graeven, D. B. Reciprocal self-disclosure in a dyad.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1971,7 389–400.Google Scholar
  49. Festinger, L. Informal social communication.Psychological Review 1950,57 271–282.Google Scholar
  50. Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations 1957,7 117–140.Google Scholar
  51. Festinger, L.A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  52. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., and Back, K.Social pressure in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. New York: Harper, 1950.Google Scholar
  53. French, J. R. P., Jr., and Snyder, R. Leadership and interpersonal power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.),Studies in social power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  54. Frey, P. W. Student ratings of teaching: Validity of several rating factors.Science 1973,182 83–85.Google Scholar
  55. Fulcher, D. G., and Anderson, W. T. Interpersonal dissimilarity and teaching effectiveness: A relational analysis.Journal of Educational Research 1974,68 19–25.Google Scholar
  56. Garrison, R. J., Anderson, V. E., and Reed, S. C. Assortative marriage.Eugenics Quarterly 1968,15 113–127.Google Scholar
  57. Gerard, H. B., and Mathewson, G. C. The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group: A replication.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1966,2 278–287.Google Scholar
  58. Good, K. C., and Good, L. R. Attitude similarity and attraction to an instructor.Psychological Reports 1973,33 335–337.Google Scholar
  59. Griffin, K., and Ehrlich, L. Attitudinal effects of a group discussion on a proposed change in company policy.Speech Monographs 1963,30 377–379.Google Scholar
  60. Griffitt, W. Attitude similarity and attraction. In T. L. Huston (Ed.),Foundations of interpersonal attraction. New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  61. Griffitt, W., and Veitch, R. Preacquaintance attitude similarity and attraction revisted: Ten days in a fallout shelter.Sociometry 1974,37 163–173.Google Scholar
  62. Grush, J. E., Clore, G. L., and Costin, F. Dissimilarity and attraction: When difference makes a difference.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,32 783–789.Google Scholar
  63. Hartup, W. W. Peers as agents of social reinforcement.Young Children 1967,20 214–228.Google Scholar
  64. Harvey, O. J., and Beverly, G. D. Some personality correlates of concept change through role playing.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1961,63 125–130.Google Scholar
  65. Heider, F.The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
  66. Helmreich, R., Aronson, E., and LeFan, J. To err is humanizing—sometimes: Effects of self-esteem, competence, and a pratfall on interpersonal attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,16 259–264.Google Scholar
  67. Helson, H. Adaptation-level theory. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 1).Sensory, perceptual and physiological formulations. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959, pp. 565–621.Google Scholar
  68. Hendrick, C., and Brown, S. R. Introversion, extraversion, and interpersonal attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,20 31–35.Google Scholar
  69. Homans, G. C.Social behavior: Its elementary forms (Rev. Ed). New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1974.Google Scholar
  70. Horowitz, M. W., Lyons, J., and Perlmutter, H. V. Induction of forces in discussion groups.Human Relations 1951,4 57–76.Google Scholar
  71. Izard, C. E. Personality similarity and friendship.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1960,61 47–51 (a).Google Scholar
  72. Izard, C. E. Personality similarity, positive affect, and interpersonal attraction.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1960,61 484–485 (b).Google Scholar
  73. Jecker, J., and Landy, D. Liking a person as a function of doing him a favor.Human Relations 1969,22 371–378.Google Scholar
  74. Jellison, J. M., and Zeisset, P. T. Attraction as a function of the commonality and desirability of a trait shared by others.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969,11 115–120.Google Scholar
  75. Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T.Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1975.Google Scholar
  76. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Johnson, J., and Anderson, D. Effects of cooperative vs. individualized instruction on student prosocial behavior, attitudes toward learning, and achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology 1976,68 446–452.Google Scholar
  77. Jones, E. E.Ingratiation: A social psychological analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964.Google Scholar
  78. Jones, E. E., Gergen, K. J., and Davis, K. E. Some determinants of reactions to being approved or disapproved as a person.Psychological Monographs, 1962,76 (whole no. 521).Google Scholar
  79. Jones, E. E., and Gordon, E. M. Timing of self-disclosure and its effects on personal attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,24 358–365.Google Scholar
  80. Jones, E. E., and Wortman, C.Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  81. Jones, S. C., and Panitch, D. The self-fulfilling prophecy and interpersonal attraction.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1971,7 356–366.Google Scholar
  82. Jones, S. C., and Pines, H. Self-revealing events and interpersonal evaluations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968,8 277–281.Google Scholar
  83. Jones, S. C., and Schneider, D. J. Certainty of self-appraisal and reactions to evaluations from others.Sociometry 1968,31 395–403.Google Scholar
  84. Jones, S. C., and Schrauger, J. Reputation and self-evaluation as determinants of attractiveness.Sociometry 1970,33 276–286.Google Scholar
  85. Jourard, S. M. Self-disclosure and other-cathexis.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1959,59 428–431.Google Scholar
  86. Jourard, S. M.Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1971.Google Scholar
  87. Jourard, S. M., and Landsman, M. J. Cognition, cathexis, and the “dyadic effect” in men's self-disclosing behavior.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 1960,6 178–186.Google Scholar
  88. Kaplan, M. F. Attitude similarity and attraction: Toward a theoretical reconciliation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Detroit, May 1971.Google Scholar
  89. Kaplan, M. F., and Anderson, N. H. Comparison of information integration and reinforcement models for interpersonal attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973,28 301–312.Google Scholar
  90. Kelley, H. H. The warm-cold variable in first impressions of persons.Journal of Personality 1950,18 431–439.Google Scholar
  91. Kohlan, R. G. A comparison of faculty evaluations early and late in the course.Journal of Higher Education 1973,44 587–595.Google Scholar
  92. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., and Masia, B. B.Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 2. Affective domain. New York: McKay, 1964.Google Scholar
  93. Levenson, H., and LeUnes, A. Students' evaluation of an instructor: Effects of similarity of attitudes.Psychological Reports 1974,34 1074.Google Scholar
  94. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., and White, R. K. Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates.”Journal of Social Psychology 1939,10 271–299.Google Scholar
  95. Lombardo, J. P., Steigleder, M., and Feinberg, R. Internality-externality: The perception of negatively valued personality characteristics and interpersonal attraction.Representative Research in Social Psychology 1975,6 89–95.Google Scholar
  96. Lott, A. J., and Lott, B. E. Group cohesiveness and individual learning.Journal of Educational Psychology 1966,57 61–73.Google Scholar
  97. Lott, A. J., and Lott, B. E. A learning theory approach to interpersonal attitudes. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, and T. M. Ostrom (Eds.),Psychological foundations of attitudes. New York: Academic Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  98. Lott, A. J., and Lott, B. E. Some indirect measures of interpersonal attraction among children.Journal of Educational Psychology 1970,61 124–135.Google Scholar
  99. Lott, A. J., and Lott, B. E. The power of liking: Consequences of interpersonal attitudes derived from a liberalized view of secondary reinforcement. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  100. Lott, A. J., Lott, B. E., Reed, T., and Crow, T. Personality-trait descriptions of differentially-liked persons.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,16 284–290.Google Scholar
  101. Lott, A. J., Lott, B. E., and Walsh, M. L. The learning of paired associates relevant to differentially liked persons.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,16 274–283.Google Scholar
  102. Lott, B. E., and Lott, A. J. The formation of positive attitudes toward group members.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1960,61 297–300.Google Scholar
  103. Luchins, A. S. Primacy-recency in impression formation. In C. I. Hovland (Ed.),The order of presentation in impression formation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  104. Malof, M., and Lott, A. J. Ethnocentrism and the acceptance of Negro support in a group pressure situation.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1961,65 254–258.Google Scholar
  105. McCoy, N., and Zigler, E. Social reinforcer effectiveness as a function of the relationship between child and adult.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1965,1 604–612.Google Scholar
  106. McKeachie, W. J., and Lin, Y. G. Sex differences in student response to college teachers: Teacher warmth and teacher sex.American Educational Research Journal 1971,8 221–226.Google Scholar
  107. McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y. G., and Mann, W. Student ratings of teacher effectiveness: Validity studies.American Educational Research Journal 1971,8 435–445.Google Scholar
  108. Mettee, D. R., and Aronson, E. Affective reactions to appraisal from others. In T. L. Huston (Ed.),Foundations of interpersonal attraction. New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  109. Nelson, D. Attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction: The approval-cue hypothesis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, Arlington, Texas, May 1966.Google Scholar
  110. Newcomb, T. M.Personality and social change. New York: Dryden, 1943.Google Scholar
  111. Newcomb, T. M.The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961.Google Scholar
  112. Newcomb, T. M., Koenig, K. E., Flacks, R., and Warwick, D. P.Persistance and change: Bennington College and its students after twenty-five years. New York: Wiley, 1967.Google Scholar
  113. Nord, W. Social exchange theory: An integrative approach to social conformity.Psychological Bulletin 1969,71 174–208.Google Scholar
  114. Novak, D. W., and Lerner, M. J. Rejection as a consequence of perceived similarity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968,9 147–152.Google Scholar
  115. Oles, H. J. Stability of student evaluation of instructors and their courses with implications for validity.Educational and Psychological Measurement 1975,35 437–445.Google Scholar
  116. Osgood, C. E., and Tannenbaum, P. H. The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change.Psychological Review 1955,62 42–55.Google Scholar
  117. Palmer, J.Vindication, evaluation, and the effect of a stranger's competence on the attitude similarity-attraction function. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, 1969.Google Scholar
  118. Palmer, J., and Byrne, D. Attraction toward dominant and submissive strangers: Similarity versus complementarity.Journal of Experimental Research in Psychology 1970,4 108–115.Google Scholar
  119. Patterson, G. R., and Anderson, D. Peers as social reinforcers.Child Development 1964,35 951–960.Google Scholar
  120. Paulson, S. F. The effects of prestige of the speaker and acknowledgement of opposing arguments on audience retention and shift of opinion.Speech Monographs 1954,21 267–271.Google Scholar
  121. Pearson, K., and Lee, A. On the law of inheritance in man: I. Inheritance of physical characters.Biometrika 1903,2 357–462.Google Scholar
  122. Reader, N., and English, H. B. Personality factors in adolescent female friendships.Journal of Consulting Psychology 1947,11 212–220.Google Scholar
  123. Richardson, H. Studies of mental resemblance between husbands and wives and between friends.Psychological Bulletin 1939,36 104–120.Google Scholar
  124. Rokeach, M., and Mezei, L. Race and shared belief as factors in social choice.Science 1966,151 167–172.Google Scholar
  125. Rubin, J. E.Impression changes as a function of level of self-disclosure. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Florida, 1968.Google Scholar
  126. Sampson, E. E., and Insko, C. A. Cognitive consistency and conformity in the autokinetic situation.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1964,68 189–192.Google Scholar
  127. Schachter, S.The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  128. Schmidt, L. D., and Strong, S. R. Attractiveness and influence in counseling.Journal of Counseling Psychology 1971,18 348–351.Google Scholar
  129. Senn, D. Attraction as a function of similarity-dissimilarity in task performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,8 120–123.Google Scholar
  130. Sherwood, J. J. Self-identity and referent others.Sociometry 1965,28 66–81.Google Scholar
  131. Simons, H. W., Berkowitz, N. N., and Moyer, R. J. Similarity, credibility, and attitude change: A review and a theory.Psychological Bulletin 1970,73 1–16.Google Scholar
  132. Solomon, D., Rosenberg, L., and Bezdek, W. E. Teacher behavior and student learning.Journal of Educational Psychology 1964,55 23–30.Google Scholar
  133. Stang, D. J. Conformity, ability, and self-esteem.Representative Research in Social Psychology 1972,3 97–103.Google Scholar
  134. Stein, D. D., Hardyk, J., and Smith, M. B. Race and belief: An open and shut case.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1965,1 281–290.Google Scholar
  135. Tagiuri, R. Person perception. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology 2nd ed., Vol. 3. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1969.Google Scholar
  136. Taylor, S. E., and Mettee, D. R. When similarity breeds contempt.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,20 175–181.Google Scholar
  137. Thibaut, J. W., and Kelley, H. H.The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
  138. Wallach, M. A., Kogan, N., and Bem, D. J. Group influence on individual risk-taking.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1962,65 75–86.Google Scholar
  139. Widlak, F. W., and Quereshi, M. Y. Student characteristics and instructor ratings: A person perception approach. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, 1972.Google Scholar
  140. Zajonc, R. B. The process of cognitive timing in communication.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1960,61 159–167.Google Scholar
  141. Zajonc, R. B. Social facilitation.Science 1965,149 269–274.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© APS Publications, Inc. 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seymour W. Uranowitz
    • 1
  • Kenneth O. DoyleJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Measurement Services CenterUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis

Personalised recommendations