Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 97–114 | Cite as

Psychological aggression in dating relationships: The role of interpersonal control

  • Jan E. Stets


This research examines the relatively unexplored area of psychological aggression in dating relationships. One causal factor of particular interest is interpersonal control, that is, the degree to which one person controls another in a relationship. Data are collected on men and women inflicting and sustaining psychological abuse in heterosexual college dating relationships. The results show that interpersonal control is an important predictor of psychological aggression.

Key words

psychological aggression dating/courtship aggression control 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amemiya, T. (1974). Multivariate regression and simultaneous equation models when the dependent variables are truncated normal.Econometrica 42: 999–1011.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A., Ross, D., and Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models.J. Abnorm. Social Psychol. 63: 575–582.Google Scholar
  3. Barling, J., and Arias, I. (1987). Psychological and physical abuse among engaged couples. Paper presented at the American Criminology Meetings.Google Scholar
  4. Black, D. (1983). Crime as Social Control.Am. Sociological Rev. 48: 34–45.Google Scholar
  5. Block, J. H. (1983). Differential premises arising from differential socialization of the sexes: Some conjectures.Child Devel. 54: 1335–1354.Google Scholar
  6. Brownmiller, S. (1975).Against Our Will. Women and Rape, Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Burke, P. J., Stets, J. E., and Pirog-Good, M. A. (1988). Gender identity, self-esteem and physical and sexual abuse in dating relationships.Social Psycliol. Quart. 52: 272–285.Google Scholar
  8. Cate, R., Henton, J., Koval, J., Christopher, F. S., and Lloyd, S. (1982). Premarital abuse: A social psychological perspective.J. Fam. Issues 3: 79–90.Google Scholar
  9. Comins, C. A. (1984). Courtship violence: A recent study and its implications for future research. Presented at the Second National Conference on Family Violence Research, University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
  10. Deal, J. E., and Wampler, K. S. (1986). Dating violence: The primacy of previous experience.J. Social Pers. Relat. 3: 457–471.Google Scholar
  11. DeGregoria, B. (1987). Sex role attitude and perception of psychological abuse.Sex Roles 5/6: 227–235.Google Scholar
  12. DeMaris, A. (1987). The efficacy of a spouse abuse model in accounting for courtship violence.J. Fam. Issues 8: 291–305.Google Scholar
  13. Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1979).Violence Against Women, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Polek, D. S., and McNeill-Hawkins, K. (1988). Factors associated with patterns of dating violence toward college women.J. Fam. Viol. 3: 169–182.Google Scholar
  15. Garbino, J., Guttmann, E., and Seeley, J. W. (1986).The Psychologically Battered Child, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
  16. Gondolf, E. W. (1985). Fighting for control: A clinical assessment of men who batter.Social Casework 66: 48–54.Google Scholar
  17. Good, D. H., Pirog-Good, M. A., and Sickles, R. C. (1986). An analysis of youth crime and employment patterns.J. Quant. Criminol. 2: 219–236.Google Scholar
  18. Hagan, J., Gillis, A. R., and Simpson, J. (1985). The class structure of gender and delinquency: Toward a power-control theory of common delinquent behavior. Am. J. Sociol. 90: 1151–1178.Google Scholar
  19. Hagan, J., Simpson, J., and Gillis, A. R. (1987). Class in the household: A power-control theory of gender and delinquency.Am. J. Sociol. 92: 788–816.Google Scholar
  20. Hanushek, E. A., and Jackson, J. E. (1977).Statistical Methods for Social Scientists, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Heise, D. R., and Bohrnstedt, G. W. (1970). Validity, invalidity, and reliability. In Borgatta, E. F., and Bohrnstedt G. W. (eds.),Sociological Methodology, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., pp. 104–129.Google Scholar
  22. Henton, J., Cate, R., Koval, J., Lloyd, S., and Christopher, S. F. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships.J. Fam. Issues 4: 467–482.Google Scholar
  23. Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1976). Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs.J. Social Issues 32: 147–168.Google Scholar
  24. Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar
  25. Hoffman, P. (1984). Psychological abuse of women by spouses and live-in lovers.Wom. Ther. 3: 37–47.Google Scholar
  26. Holmes, J. G., and Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In Hendrick, C. (ed.),Close Relationships, Sage, Newbury Park, Calif., pp. 187–220.Google Scholar
  27. Hornung, C. A., McCuIlough, B. C., and Sugimonto, T. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse.J. Marr. Fam. 43: 675–692.Google Scholar
  28. Huston, T. L., and Ashmore, R. D. (1986). Women and men in personal relationships. In Ashmore, R. D., and Del Boca, F. K. (eds.),The Social Psychology of Female-Male Relations, Academic Press, New York, pp. 167–210.Google Scholar
  29. Kalmuss, D. S., and Straus, M. A. (1982). Wife's marital dependency and wife abuse.J. Marr. Fam. 44: 277–286.Google Scholar
  30. Kaplan, H. B. (1982). Deviant behavior and self-enhancement in adolescence. In Rosenberg, M., and Kaplan, H. B. (eds.),Social Psychology of the Self-Concept, Harlan Davidson, Arlington Heights, Ill, pp. 466–482.Google Scholar
  31. Kelly, C., Huston, T. L., and Cate, R. M. (1985). Premarital relationships correlates of the erosion of satisfaction in marriage.J. Social Pers. Relat. 2: 167–178.Google Scholar
  32. Laner, M. R. (1989). Competition and combativeness in courtship: Reports from men.J. Fam. Viol. 4: 47–62.Google Scholar
  33. Laner, M. R., and Thompson, J. (1982). Abuse and aggression in courting couples.Dev. Behav. Interdis. J. 3: 229–44.Google Scholar
  34. O'Brien, J. E. (1971). Violence in Divorce Prone Families.J. Marr. Fam. 33: 692–698.Google Scholar
  35. Peplau, L. A. (1984). Power in Dating Relationships. In Freeman, J. (ed.),Women: A Feminist Perspective, Mayfield, Palo Alto, Calif., pp. 100–112.Google Scholar
  36. Rosenberg, M. (1979).Conceiving the Self, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Russell, D. E. H. (1984).Sexual Exploitation: Rape, Child Sexual Abuse, and Workplace Harassment, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.Google Scholar
  38. Sigelman, C. K., Berry, C. J., and Wiles, K. A. (1984). Violence in college students' dating relationships.J. Appl. Social Psychol. 14: 530–548.Google Scholar
  39. Stets, J. E. (1988).Domestic Violence and Control, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Stets, J. E. (1990). Verbal and physical abuse in marriage.J. Man. Fam. 52: 501–514.Google Scholar
  41. Stets, J. E., and Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationships.Social Psychol. Quart. 50: 237–246.Google Scholar
  42. Stets, J. E., and Pirog-Good, M. A. (1989). Sexual aggression and control in dating relationships.J. Appl. Social Psychol. 19: 1392–1412.Google Scholar
  43. Stets, J. E., and Pirog-Good, M. A. (1990). Interpersonal control and courtship aggression.J. Social Pers. Relat. 7: 371–394.Google Scholar
  44. Straus, M. A. (1974). Leveling, civility, and violence in the family.J. Marr. Fam. 36: 13–29.Google Scholar
  45. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales.J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–88.Google Scholar
  46. Sugarman, D. B., and Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (eds.),Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger, New York, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
  47. Walker, L. E. (1979).The Battered Woman, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Waller, W. (1938).The Family: A Dynamic Interpretation, Dryden Press, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Weitzman, L. J. (1979).Sex Role Socialization, Mayfield Publishing Co., Palo Alto, Calif.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan E. Stets
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyWashington State UniversityPullman

Personalised recommendations