Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 95–105

Child abuse by baby-sitters: An ecological-interactional interpretation

  • Leslie Margolin
Article

Abstract

This study explored the social contexts in which physical abuse by baby-sitters occurred. This was accomplished through a content analysis of 98 “founded” case records of physical abuse committed by baby-sitters. In 70% of the case records there was evidence that sitters had a conflict with the victim prior to the abusive act. Children fighting with other children was the most common type of disturbance, followed by conflicts surrounding toilet training, children's continuous crying, disobedience, and rudeness. There was evidence that parents' explicit or implicit approval of baby-sitters' violence contributed to the child abuse in approximately one-quarter of the cases.

Key words

child abuse violence baby-sitters child care 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altheide, D. L. (1987). Reflections: Ethnographic content analysis.Qual. Social. 10: 65–77.Google Scholar
  2. Athens, L. H. (1980).Violent Criminal Acts and Actors: A Symbolic Interactionist Study, Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston.Google Scholar
  3. Belsky, J. (1980). Child maltreatment: An ecological integration.Am. Psychologist 35: 320–335.Google Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979).The Ecology of Human Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Denzin, N. (1984). Toward a phenomenology of domestic family violence.Am. J. Social. 90: 483–511.Google Scholar
  6. Garbarino, J. (1977a). The human ecology of child maltreatment: A conceptual model for research.J. Marr. Fam. 39: 721–727.Google Scholar
  7. Garbarino, J. (1977b). The price of privacy: An analysis of the social dynamics of child abuse.Child Welf. 56: 565–575.Google Scholar
  8. Gelles, R. J. (1979).Fam. Viol. Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  9. Gelles, R. J., and Cornell, C. P. (1985).Intimate Violence in Families, Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  10. Gil, D. (1976). Primary prevention of child abuse: a philosophical issue.J. Pediat. Psychol. 1: 54–57.Google Scholar
  11. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. (1967).The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Goffman, Irving. (1967).Interaction ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, Doubleday, Garden City.Google Scholar
  13. Justice, B., and Justice, R. (1976).The Abusing Family. Human Sciences Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Kempe, R. S., and Kempe, C. H. (1978).Child Abuse, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Kourany, R. F. C., Martin, J. E., and LaBarbera, (1980). Adolescents as Babysitters.Adolescence 40: 155–158.Google Scholar
  16. Luckenbill, D. F. (1977). Criminal homicide as a situated transaction.Social Probl. 25: 176–186.Google Scholar
  17. Margolin, L., and Craft, J. L. (1990). Child abuse by adolescent caregivers.Child Abuse Negl. 14: 365–373.Google Scholar
  18. Martin, J. E., and Kourany, R. F. C. (1980). Child abuse by adolescent babysitters.Child Abuse Negl. 4: 15–22.Google Scholar
  19. Mead, G. H. (1934).Mind, Self, and Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. Scarr, S. (1984).Mother Care/Other Care, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Steele, B., and Pollack, C. (1968). A psychiatric study of parents who abuse infants and small children. In Helfer, R., and Kempe, C. H. (eds.),The Battered Child, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 103–147.Google Scholar
  22. Stryker, S. (Aug., 1987). The interplay of affect and identity: Exploring the relationships of social structure, social interaction, self and emotion. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Sociological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie Margolin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Home EconomicsThe University of IowaIowa City

Personalised recommendations