Research in Higher Education

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 155–187 | Cite as

Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition

  • John P. Bean


The purpose of this research is to investigate the determinants of student attrition in institutions of higher education. A causal model was developed which synthesized research findings on turnover in work organizations and on student attrition. Questionnaires were distributed to university freshmen (N = 1,171). The data was analyzed using multiple regression and path analysis. The regressions produced anR2 = .36 for females and .27 for males. Findings indicate that three surrogate measures for pay were significantly related to intent to leave for both sexes and that the theories and determinants developed in research on turnover are useful in studies of student attrition.


High Education Research Finding Education Research Surrogate Measure Path Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aiken, M., and Hage, J. Reply to Tausky.American Sociological Review 1967,32 118–120.Google Scholar
  2. American College Testing Program.Class profile, national norms: ACT class profile report for 1976–1977 freshmen. Iowa City: ACT Research Services, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Astin, A. W.College dropouts: a national profile. ACE Research Reports, 7. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Astin, A. W.Preventing students from dropping out. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Baumgart, N. E., and Johnstone, J. N. Attrition at an Australian university: a case study.Journal of Higher Education 1977,48 553–570.Google Scholar
  6. Bayer, A. E. College dropout: factors affecting senior college completion.Sociology of Education 1968,41 305–316.Google Scholar
  7. Bean, J. P.Dropouts and turnover: the synthesis of a causal model of student attrition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa, 1978.Google Scholar
  8. Bean, J. P. Path analysis: The development of a suitable methodology for the study of student attrition. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association meeting, San Francisco, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, D., and Fiske, R. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychology Bulletin 1959,56 81–105.Google Scholar
  10. Cope R. and Hannah, W.Revolving college doors. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  11. Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 1951,16 297–334.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, J. A. The campus as a frog pond: an application of the theory of relative deprivation in career decisions of college men.American Journal of Sociology 1966,72 17–31.Google Scholar
  13. Durkheim, E.Suicide (J. Spaulding and G. Simpson, Trans.). Glencoe: The Free Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  14. Heise, D. R. Problems in path analysis and causal inference. In E. F. Borgatta (Ed.),Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969.Google Scholar
  15. Heywood, J. A report on student wastage.New Universities Quarterly 1971,25 189–237.Google Scholar
  16. Iffert, R. E.Retention and withdrawal of college students. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education, 1958.Google Scholar
  17. Kerlinger, F. L. and Pedhazur, E. J.,Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
  18. Kim, J. and Kohout, F. Multiple regression analysis: subprogram regression. In Nie, et al (Eds.)Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.Google Scholar
  19. Knoell, D. M. Institutional research on retention and withdrawal. InResearch on College Students. Boulder, Colorado, and Berkeley, California: The Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education and the Center for Higher Education, 1960.Google Scholar
  20. Land, K. C. Principles of Path Analysis. In Edgar F. Borgatta (ed.), Sociological Methodology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Mehra, N.Retention and withdrawal of university students: a study of academic performance of a freshman class. Alberta: University of Alberta, 1973.Google Scholar
  22. Merton, R. K.Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  23. Nunnally, J. C.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.Google Scholar
  24. Pantages, T. J., and Creedon, C. F. Studies of college attrition: 1950–1975.Review of Educational Research 1978,48 49–101.Google Scholar
  25. Price, J. L.The Study of Turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  26. Richling, J. 70 percent.New Universities Quarterly 1971,25 135–138.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenberg, M.The Logic of Survey Analysis. New York: Basic Books, 1968.Google Scholar
  28. Sexton, V. Factors contributing to attrition in college populations: twenty-five years of research.Personnel and Guidance Journal 1965,72 301–326.Google Scholar
  29. Spady, W. G. Dropouts from higher education: an interdisciplinary review and synthesis.Interchange 1970,1 64–85.Google Scholar
  30. Spady, W. G. Dropouts from higher education: toward an empirical model.Interchange 1971,2 38–62.Google Scholar
  31. SPSS. Batch release. 7.0 Update Manual (Multilith).Google Scholar
  32. Summerskill, J. Dropouts from college. In N. Sanford (Ed.),The American College. New York: Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar
  33. Terenzini, P. T. and Pascarella, E. T. The relation of freshmen students' social and academic integration to attrition. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of The Association for Institutional Research, Los Angeles, 1976.Google Scholar
  34. Terenzini, P. T., and Pascarella, E. T. Toward the validation of Tinto's model of student attrition: a review of recent studies. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association of Institutional Research, San Diego, 1979.Google Scholar
  35. Tinto, V. Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research.Review of Educational Research 1975,45 89–125.Google Scholar
  36. Vaizey, J. The Costs of Wastage.New Universities Quarterly 1971,25 139–145.Google Scholar
  37. Wegner, E. L. and Sewell, W. H. Selection and context as factors affecting the probability of graduation from college.American Journal of Sociology 1970,75 665–679.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Bean
    • 1
  1. 1.Office of Program ReviewUniversity of Nebraska—LincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations