Advertisement

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 299–311 | Cite as

The tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment

  • William L. Sanders
  • Sandra P. Horn
Article

Keywords

Assessment System Personnel Management Educational Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Astin, A. W. (1982), Excellence and equity in American education. Washington, DC: National Commission on Excellence in Education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 227 098.Google Scholar
  2. Bingham, R.D., Heywood, J.S., & White, S.B. (1991). Evaluating schools and teachers based on student performance.Evaluation Review, 15, 191–218.Google Scholar
  3. Harville, D.A. (1976). Extension of the Gauss-Markov theorem to include the estimation of random effects.Annals of Statistics, 4, 384–395.Google Scholar
  4. Henderson, C.R. (1973). Sire evaluation and genetic trends.Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetic Symposium in Honor of Dr. Jay L. Lush. Champaign, IL: ASAS and ADSA, pp. 10–41.Google Scholar
  5. — (1984).Applications of linear models in animal breeding. Guelph, Canada: University of Guelph.Google Scholar
  6. McLean, R.A., Sanders, W.L. (1984),Objective component of teacher evaluation: A feasibility study (Working Paper No. 199). Knoxville: University of Tennessee, College of Business Administration.Google Scholar
  7. McLean, R.A., Sanders, William L., & Stroup, Walter W. (1991). A unified approach to mixed linear models,American Statistician, 45, 54–64.Google Scholar
  8. Millman, J. (ed.), (1981).Handbook of teacher evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Mood, A.M. (1950).Introduction to the theory of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Sanders, W.L. (1989). A multivariate mixed model. InApplications of mixed models in agriculture and related disciplines. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 343. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, pp. 138–144.Google Scholar
  11. Sanders, W.L., et al. (1994). Effects of building change on indicators of student academic growth,Evaluation Perspectives, 4, 3–7.Google Scholar
  12. Searle, S.R. (1971).Linear models. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Tennessee State Board of Education. (1992).The Master Plan for Tennessee Schools 1993. Nashville: Author.Google Scholar
  14. Travers, R.M.W. (1981). In J. Millmen (ed.),Handbook of teacher evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Williams, P.L. (1989). Using customized standardized tests. Contract No. R-88-062003. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. ERIC Digest No. ED 314429.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • William L. Sanders
    • 1
  • Sandra P. Horn
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment CenterUniversity of TennesseeKnoxville
  2. 2.University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations