Strong pretorsions and strong filters, modules, and rings of quotients

N. Bourbaki, Algebre commutative, Chaps. I and II, Paris (1961).Google Scholar

P. Gabriel, “Des categories Abeliennes,” Bull. Soc. Math. France,90, 323–448 (1962).Google Scholar

J.-M. Maranda, “Injective structures,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.,110, 98–135 (1964).Google Scholar

A. W. Goldie, “Torsion-free modules and rings,” J. Algebra,1, 268–287 (1964).Google Scholar

Yu. M. Ryabukhin, “Radicals in categories,” Izv. Akad. Nauk MSSR, Seriya Fiz.-Mat. i Tekhn. Nauk,4, 58–74 (1964).Google Scholar

S. E. Dickson, “A torsion theory for abelian categories,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.,121, 223–235 (1966).Google Scholar

J. Jans, “Some aspects of torsion,” Pacific J. Math.,15, 1249–1259 (1965).Google Scholar

O. Goldman, “Rings and modules of quotients,” J. Algebra,13, 10–47 (1969).Google Scholar

A. P. Mishina and L. A. Skornyakov, Abelian Groups and Modules [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1969).Google Scholar

J. Lambek, Torsion Theories, Additive Semantics, and Rings of Quotients, New York (1971).Google Scholar

V. P. Elizarov, “On a general theory of rings of quotients,” Sib. Matem. Zh.,11, No. 3, 524–546 (1970); Sib. Matem. Zh.,13, No. 6, 1411–1413 (1972).Google Scholar

D. E. Sanderson, “A generalization of divisibility and injectivity in modules,” Canad. Math. Bull.,8, 505–513 (1965).Google Scholar

A. I. Kashu “Closed classes of A-modules and closed sets of left ideals of ring A,” Matem. Zametki,5, No. 3, 381–390 (1969).Google Scholar

A. C. Mewborn, “Generalized centralizer of modules,” Duke Math. J.,35, 575–580 (1968).Google Scholar

V. P. Elizarov, “Essential and completely essential rings of quotients,” in: Proceedings of the Eleventh All-Union Algebraic Colloquium [in Russian], Kishinev (1971), pp. 131–132.Google Scholar

A. I. Kashu, “On divisibility in modules,” Matem. Issledovaniya,6, No. 2 (20), 74–84 (1971).Google Scholar