Neurochemical Research

, Volume 11, Issue 8, pp 1139–1149 | Cite as

Genetic determination of striatal tyrosine hydroxylase activity in mice

  • Csaba Vadász
  • Istvan Sziráki
  • Leelavati R. Murthy
  • Abel Lajtha
Original Articles

Abstract

An additive major gene effect is described for tyrosine hydroxylase activity in mouse corpus striatum (CS). Quantitative genetic analysis indicated the presence of a segregating Mendelian factor with robust additive effect in F2 generations derived from crossing two highly inbred mouse strains, C57BL/6ByJ and BALB/ cJ, with intermediate (INT) and high (HI) TH activity in CS. Significant positive correlation was found between striatal and mesencephalic TH activity in the segregating generations, raising the possiblity that a common single gene may express its effect through pleiotropy or linkage. Genetic preparations taking advantage of the major gene effect should serve well as animal models of DA-mediated neuropsychiatric disorders.

Keywords

Tyrosine Genetic Analysis Single Gene Significant Positive Correlation Mouse Strain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kessler, S., Ciaranello, R. D., Shire, J. G. M., andBarchas, J. D. 1971. Genetic variation in catecholamine synthetizing enzyme activities. Genetics (Suppl.) 68:33.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kessler, S., Ciaranello, R. D., Shire, J. G. M., andBarchas, J. D. 1982. Genetic variation in activity of enzymes involved in synthesis of catecholamines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 69:2248–2450.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ciaranello, R. D., Barchas, S. andBarchas, J. D. 1972. Strain differences in biosynthetic enzyme activity in mice. Life Sci. 11:565–572.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tiplady, B., Killian, J. J., andMandel, P. 1976. Tyrosine hydroxylase in various brain regions of three strains of mice differing in spontaneous activity, learning ability and emotionality. Life Sci. 18:1065–1070.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ross, R. A., Judd, A. B., Pickel, V. M., Joh, T. H., andReis, D. J. 1976. Strain dependent variations in number of midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Nature (Lond.) 264:645–654.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baker, H., Joh, T. H., andReis, D. J. 1980. Genetic control of number of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in inbred strains of mice: relationship to size and neuronal density of the striatum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 77:4369–4373.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baker, H., Joh, T. H., andReis, D. J. 1982. Time of appearance during development of differences in nigrostriatal tyrosine hydroxylase activity in two inbred mouse strains. Dev. Brain Res. 4:157–165.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vadasz, C., Baker, H., Joh, T. H., Lajtha, A., andReis, D. J. 1982. The inheritance and genetic correlation of tyrosine hydroxylase activity in the substantia nigra and corpus striatum in the CXB recombinant inbred mouse strains. Brain Res. 234:1–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baker, H., Joh, T. H., Ruggiero, D. A., andReiss, D. J. 1983. Variations in number of dopamine neurons and tyrosine hydroxylase activity in hypothalamus of two mouse strains. J. Neurosci. 3:832–843.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vadasz, C., Kobor, G., andLajtha, A. 1982. Neurobehavioral genetic analysis in recombinant inbred strains. Pages 127–154.in Lieblich, I. (ed.) Genetics of the Brain, Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waller, S. B., Ingram, D. K., Reynolds, M. A., andLondon, E. D. 1983. Age and strain comparisons of neurotransmitter synthetic enzyme activities in the mouse. J. Neurochem. 41:1421–1428.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vadasz, C., Baker, M., Fink, S., andReis, D. J. 1985. Genetic effects and sexual dimorphism in tyrosine hydroxylase activity in two mouse strains and their reciprocal F1 hybrids. Neurogenetics 2:219–230.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Segal, D. S., Kuczenski, R. T., andMandel, A. J. 1972. Strain differences in behavior and brain tyrosine hydroxylase activity. Behav. Biol. 7:75–81.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wimer, R. E., Wimer, C. C. 1982. A biometrical-genetic analysis of granule cell number in the area dentata of house mice. Develop Brain Res. 2:129–140.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coyle, J. T. 1972. Tyrosine hydroxylase in rat brain-cofactor requirement, regional and subcellular distribution. Biochem. Pharmacol. 21:1935–1944.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Joh, T. H., Gegham, C., andReis, D. J. 1973. Immunochemical demonstration of increased accumulation of tyrosine hydroxylase protein in sympathetic ganglia and adrenal medulla elicited by reserpine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 70:2667–2671.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mather, K., andJinks, T. L. 1971. Biometrical Genetics: The Study of Continuous Variation. Chapman-Hall, Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dixon, W. J. 1983. BMDP Statistical Software. University of California Press. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Falconer, D. S. 1983. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Second ed. Longman Inc. New York.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Falconer, D. S. 1963. Quantitative inheritance. Pages 193–216,in Burdette, W. J. (ed.) Methodology in Mammalian Genetics. Holden-Day, Inc., San Francisco, Ca.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bruell, J. H. 1962. Dominance and segregation in the inheritance of quantitative behavior in mice. Pages 48–67,in Bliss, E. L. (ed.) Roots of Behavior. Hoeber and Harper, New York.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elston, R. C. 1981. Testing one- and two-locus hypotheses for the genetic difference of a quantitative trait between two homozygous lines. Pages 283–293in Gershon, E. S., Matthysse, S., Breakfield, X. O., andCiaranello, R. D. (eds.) Genetic Research Strategies for Psychobiology and Psychiatry. The Boxwood Press. Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tryon, R. C. 1940. Genetic differences in maze learning ability in rats. Y.R.B.K. Natl. Soc. Stud. Educ. 39:111–119.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hall, C. S. 1951. The genetics of behavior. Pages 304–309,in Stevens, S. S. (ed.) Handbook of Experimental Psychology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hirsch, J. 1967. Behavior-genetic analysis. Pages 416–435,in Hirsch, J. (ed.) Behavior-Genetic Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tellegen, A. 1968. Note on the Tryon effect. Am. Psychol. 23:585–587.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vadasz, C., Sziraki, I., Murthy, L. R., Badalamenti, A. F. andLajtha, A. 1985. Genetic determination of mesencephalic tyrosine hydroxylase activity in the mouse. (submitted).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Carlton, P. E., andManowitz, P. 1984. Dopamine and schizophrenia: an analysis of the theory. Neurosci. Behav. Rev. 8:137–151.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carlsson, A., andLinquist, M. 1983. Effect of chlorpromazine and haloperidol on formation of 3-methoxytyramine. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 20:120–144.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van Rossum, J. M. 1966. The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs. Arch Int. Pharmacodyn. 160:429–494.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    van Praag, H. M. 1977. The significance of dopamine for the mode of action of neuroleptics and the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Br. J. Psychiatry. 130:463–474.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Davis, K. L., Davidson, M., Mohs, R. C., Kendler, K. S., Davis, B. M., Johns, C. A., Denigris, Y., andHorvath, T. B.. 1985. Plasma homovanillic acid concentration and the severity of schizophrenic illness. Science. 227:1601–1602.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Csaba Vadász
    • 1
  • Istvan Sziráki
    • 1
  • Leelavati R. Murthy
    • 1
  • Abel Lajtha
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Neurobehavioral Genetics Neurochemistry DivisionNathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric ResearchOrangeburg
  2. 2.Center for NeurochemistryNathan Kline Institute Ward's IslandNew York

Personalised recommendations