Advertisement

Personalized versus standard role plays in the assessment of depressed patients' social skill

  • Emil J. Chiauzzi
  • Richard G. Heimberg
  • Robert E. Becker
  • David Gansler
Article

Abstract

Chronically depressed outpatients participated in a study of the role-play assessment of social skill. Patients role-played a series of standard situations typical of those employed in social-skills research and additional scenes drawn from critical situations in their personal lives. These “personalized” role-play situations were perceived as more relevant by patients and resulted in more discomfort and less skillful interpersonal behavior than standard scenes. Behavioral measures derived from personalized role plays were also found to be more strongly related to measures of depression than the same measures derived from the standard role-play scenes. Implications of these findings for the role-play assessment of social skill are discussed.

Key words

depression social skills role playing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, R. E., & Heimberg, R. G. (in press). Social skills training approaches. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.),Handbook of clinical behavior therapy with adults. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bellack, A. S. (1983). Recurrent problems in the behavioral assessment of social skill.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21, 29–41.Google Scholar
  4. Bellack, A. S., Hersen, M., & Turner, S. M. (1978). Roleplay tests for assessing social skill: Are they valid?Behavior Therapy, 9, 448–461.Google Scholar
  5. Bellack, A. S., Hersen, M., & Lamparski, D. (1979). Roleplay tests for assessing social skill: Are they valid? Are they useful?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 335–342.Google Scholar
  6. Bellack, A. S., Hersen, M., & Turner, S. M. (1979). Relationship of roleplaying and knowledge of appropriate behavior to assertion in the natural environment.Journal of Consulting and Clincal Psychology, 47, 670–678.Google Scholar
  7. Bellack, A. S., Hersen, M., & Himmelhoch, J. M. (1983). A comparison of social skills training, pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for depression.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21, 101–107.Google Scholar
  8. Coyne, J. C. (1976a). Depression and the response of others.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 186–193.Google Scholar
  9. Coyne, J. C. (1976b). Toward an interactional description of depression.Psychiatry, 39, 28–40.Google Scholar
  10. Endicott, J., & Spitzer, R. L. (1978). A diagnostic interview for affective disorders and schizophrenia.Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 837–844.Google Scholar
  11. Gibbon, M., McDonald-Scott, P., & Endicott, J. (1981). Mastering the art of research interviewing.Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 1259–1262.Google Scholar
  12. Green, S. B., Burkhart, B. R., & Harrison, W. H. (1979). Personality correlates of self-report, roleplaying, and in vivo measures of assertiveness.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 16–24.Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton, D. A. (1960). Development of a rating scale for depression.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.Google Scholar
  14. Higgins, R. L., Alonso, R. R., & Pendleton, M. G. (1979). The validity of roleplay assessments of assertiveness.Behavior Therapy, 10, 655–662.Google Scholar
  15. Kern, J. M. (1982). The comparative external and concurrent validity of three roleplays for assessing heterosocial performance.Behavior Therapy, 13, 666–680.Google Scholar
  16. Kern, J. M., Miller, C., & Eggers, J. (1983). Enhancing the validity of roleplay tests: A comparison of three roleplay methodologies.Behavior Therapy, 14, 482–492.Google Scholar
  17. McNamara, J. R., & Blumer, C. (1982). Roleplaying to assess social competence: Ecological validity considerations.Behavior Modification, 6, 519–549.Google Scholar
  18. Raskin, A., Schulterbrandt, J., Reatig, N., & Rice, C. (1967). Factors of psychopathology in interview, ward behavior, and self-report ratings of hospitalized depressives.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 270–278.Google Scholar
  19. Schwartz, R. M., & Gottman, J. M. (1976). Toward a task analysis of assertive behavior.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 910–920.Google Scholar
  20. Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., & Robins, E. (1978). Research Diagnostic Criteria: Rationale and reliability.Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 773–782.Google Scholar
  21. Stotsky, S. M., & Glass, D. R. (1982). Guidlines to the Hamilton depression rating scale. Unpublished manuscript. George Washington University Medical Center, Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.Google Scholar
  22. Vincent, J. P., Friedman, L. C., Nugent, J., & Messerly, L. (1979). Demand characteristics in observations of marital interactions.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 557–566.Google Scholar
  23. Weissman, M. M., & Akiskal, H. S. (1984). The role of psychotherapy in chronic depressions: A proposal.Comprehensive Psychiatry, 25, 23–30.Google Scholar
  24. Wessberg, H. W., Mariotto, M. J., Conger, A. J., Farrell, A. D., & Conger, J. C. (1979). Ecological validity of roleplays for assessing heterosocial anxiety and skill of male college students.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 525–535.Google Scholar
  25. Wolpe, J., & Lazarus, A. A. (1966).Behavior therapy techniques. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emil J. Chiauzzi
    • 1
  • Richard G. Heimberg
    • 2
  • Robert E. Becker
    • 1
  • David Gansler
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryAlbany Medical CollegeAlbany
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyState University of New York at AlbanyAlbany

Personalised recommendations