European Journal of Nuclear Medicine

, Volume 18, Issue 9, pp 752–756 | Cite as

Registration and display of the combined bone scan and radiograph in the diagnosis and management of wrist injuries

  • David J. Hawkes
  • Louise Robinson
  • John E. Crossman
  • Haluk B. Sayman
  • Ron Mistry
  • Michael N. Maisey
  • John D. Spencer
Original articles

Abstract

A system has been developed for the registration and combined display of the X-ray image and isotope bone scan. This system has been evaluated by prospectively studying 23 patients who were referred for suspected injury of the wrist. The registration system has an inherent precision for registration of about 1 mm. When patient positioning errors are included, this increases to about 4 mm. Two observers evaluated the sets of images prior to registration and after registration and combined display. They judged that in 16 out of 17 cases judged abnormal (observer 1) and 12 out of 18 cases judged abnormal (observer 2), the registration technique improved localization of a lesion. One case was rejected as registration was not possible due to incorrect positioning of the hand.

Key words

Registration Colour display Wrist Bone scan Multi-modality Synergistic imaging 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gerlot P, Bizais Y (1988) Image registration, a review and strategy for medical applications. In: De Graaf K, Viergever MA (eds) Information processing in medical imaging. Plenum, New York, pp 81–89Google Scholar
  2. Hawkes DJ, Hill DLG, Lehmann ED, Robinson GP, Maisey MN, Colchester ACF (1990) Preliminary work on the interpretation of SPECT images with the aid of registered MRI images and an MR derived neuro-anatomical atlas. In: Hoehne KH, Fuchs H, Pizer SM (eds) 3D Imaging in Medicine: algorithms, systems, applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 241–252Google Scholar
  3. Hearn D, Baker MP (1986) Computer graphics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  4. Henze E, Graf G, Clausen M, Rall B, Weller R, Derichs D, Kreidler J, Heidenreich P, Sitzman F, Adam WE (1990) The Orthopan scintigram — a new application of emission computed tomography for facial bone scanning. Eur J Nucl Med 16:97–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. McDougall IR, Keeling CA (1988) Complications of fractures and their healing. Semin Nucl Med 18:113–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Miura S, Kanno I, Iida H, Murakami M, Takahashi K, Sasaki H, Inugami A, Shishido F, Ogawa T, Uenura K (1988) Anatomical adjustments in brain positron emission tomography using CT images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12:363–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pelizzari CA, Chen GTY, Spelbring DR, Weichselbaum RR, Chen C-T (1989) Accurate three dimensional registration of CT, PET and/or MR images of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:20–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pizer SM, Zimmerman JB (1983) Color display in ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 9:331–345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Schad LR, Boesecke R, Schlegel W, Hartmann GH, Sturm V, Strauss LG, Lorenz WJ (1987) Three dimensional image correlation of CR, MR and PET studies in radiotherapy planning of brain tumours. J Comput Assist Tomogr 11:948–954PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Taylor S, Cotton L (1982) A short textbook of surgery, 5th eds. Hodder and Stoughton, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Hawkes
    • 1
  • Louise Robinson
    • 1
  • John E. Crossman
    • 1
  • Haluk B. Sayman
    • 1
  • Ron Mistry
    • 1
  • Michael N. Maisey
    • 1
  • John D. Spencer
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Radiological SciencesUnited Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St. Thomas's Hospitals, Guy's HospitalLondon BridgeUK
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUnited Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St. Thomas's Hospitals, Guy's HospitalLondon BridgeUK

Personalised recommendations