Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 35–42

Psychoanalytic training institutes as cults: An example of entropy

  • Robert S. Pepper
Article

Abstract

Some psychoanalytic training institutes in this country more closely resemble religious cults than centers of learning. Institutes which foster the establishment of multiple role relationships between students and their instructors often unwittingly exploit students' dependence in a variety of ways. Further, there is also a conflict of interest between the institute's stated organizational goals and its need to survive. Consequently, there is a bias toward entropy. After a time, psychoanalytic institutes, like all systems, wind down. The purpose of this article is to alert the professional community to the potential hazards of the complicated relationships between instructors and supervisors at these institutes. Research studies suggest a tendency toward the development of a group-think environment where critical thinking and scientific analysis are subverted. Narcissistic gratification and passive acceptance of leaders' teachings prevail. The implications for the well-being of the candidates and the prospects for reform are explored.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Group Psychotherapy Association (1991).Ethical guidelines. New York: American Group Psychotherapy Association.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association (1980).The ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  3. Dulchin, J., and Siegel, A. (1982). The ambiguity of confidentiality in a psychoanalytic institute.”Psychiatry, 45, 27–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kramer, E. (1987). The analyst's resolution of revenge resulting from the treatment of his parents,Modern Psychoanalysis, 12, 207–219.Google Scholar
  5. Mason, J. (1990).Final analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Pepper, R. (1989) Therapist's transparency and multiple role relations.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 39, 131–132.Google Scholar
  7. Pepper, R. (1990). When transference isn't transference: Iatrogenesis of multiple role relations between practicing therapists.”Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 20, 141–153.Google Scholar
  8. Pepper, R. (1991). The senior therapist's grandiosity: Clinical and ethical consequences of merging multiple roles,Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 21, 6–370.Google Scholar
  9. Postman, N., and Weingartner, C. (1969).Teaching as a subversive activity. New York: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar
  10. Temerlin, J., and Temerlin, M. (1982). Psychotherapy cults: An iatrogenic perversion,Psychotherapy, 40, 131–140.Google Scholar
  11. Temerlin, J. and Temerlin, M. (1986). Some hazards of the therapeutic relationship,Cultic Studies Journal, 2, 234–242.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert S. Pepper
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest Hills

Personalised recommendations