Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 87–104 | Cite as

Prompt-aided instruction of mirror-image discriminations: Abrupt prompt removal, time delay, and self-evaluation

  • Paul M. Smeets
Article
Accepted:

Abstract

This study compared three types of prompt-elimination procedures for helping children respond to left-right mirror-image stimuli. Three populations participated: normally developing preschoolers, students with mild mental retardation, and students with moderate mental retardation. All subjects were first trained to discriminate the stimuli in the presence of multiple pictorial prompts. These prompts required the subjects to discriminate the compounds on the basis of orientation. Then the prompts were eliminated, abruptly, with a time-delay procedure, or with a procedure requiring subjects to use the prompts to self-evaluate the accuracy of their responses. The results showed the following. First, most subjects rapidly discriminated the compound stimuli. Second, about 50% of the subjects of each population discriminated the task stimuli even when the prompts were abruptly removed. Time delay was highly effective with the normally developing preschoolers and students with mild mental retardation, but not with students with moderate mental retardation. The self-evaluation procedure was effective with all three populations.

Key words

mirror-image discriminations normal preschoolers intellectually handicapped students time delay self-evaluation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asso, D., & Wyke, M. (1971). Discrimination of spatially confusable letters by young children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 11, 11–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baroff, G. S. (1986).Mental retardation: Nature, cause and management. New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  3. Barroso, F., & Braine, L. G. (1974). “Mirror-image” errors without mirror-image stimuli.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 213–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Braam, S. J., & Poling, A. (1983). Development of intraverbal behavior in mentally retarded individuals through transfer of stimulus control procedures: Classification of verbal responses.Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 4, 279–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Browder, D. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (1985). Applications of self-management to individuals with severe handicaps: A review.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 200–208.Google Scholar
  6. Bryant, P. E. (1969). Perception and memory of the orientation of visually presented lines by children.Nature, 224, 1331–1332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson, H. P. (1935). A study of the confusing letters b, d, p, and q.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 47, 458–467.Google Scholar
  8. Griffiths, K., & Griffiths, R. (1976). Errorless establishment of letter discriminations with a stimulus fading procedure in pre-school children.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 387–396.Google Scholar
  9. Hallahan, D. P., Lloyd, J. W., Kneedler, R. D., & Marshall, K. J. (1982). A comparison of the effects of self-versus teacher-assessment of on-task behavior.Behavior Therapy, 13, 715–723.Google Scholar
  10. Hallahan, D. P., Lloyd, J., Kosiewicz, M. M., Kauffman, J. M., & Graves, A. W. (1979). Self-monitoring of attention as a treatment for a learning disabled boy s off-task behavior.Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 24–32.Google Scholar
  11. Handen, B. L., & Zane, T. (1987). Delayed prompting: A review of procedural variations and results.Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 307–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Huttenlocher, J. (1967). Discrimination of figure orientation: Effects of relative position.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 63, 359–361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lalli, E. P., & Shapiro, E. S. (1990). The effects of self-monitoring and contingent reward on sight word acquisition.Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 129–141.Google Scholar
  14. Lancioni, G. E., Hoogeveen, F. R., Smeets, P. M., Boelens, H., & Leonard, S. N. (1989). Errorless discrimination of reversible letters: Superimposition and fading combined with an intervening response.The Psychological Record, 39, 373–385.Google Scholar
  15. Litrownik, A. J., Freitas, J. L., & Franzini, L. R. (1978). Self-regulation in mentally retarded children: Assessment and training of self-monitoring skills.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 82, 499–506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nelson, R. O., Lipinski, D. P., & Black, J. L. (1976). The reactivity of adult retardates’ self-monitoring: A comparison among behaviors of different valences, and a comparison with token reinforcement.The Psychological Record, 26, 189–201.Google Scholar
  17. Rudel, R. G., & Teuber, H. L. (1963). Discrimination of direction of line in children.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 892–898.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Smeets, P. M., Lancioni, G. E., Leonard, S. N., & Striefel, S. (1988). Time-delay discrimination training with multiple distinctive-feature prompts: The function of the incorrect (S-) prompt.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45, 303–318.Google Scholar
  19. Smeets, P. M., Lancioni, G. E., & Striefel, S. (1987). Discrimination training through time delay of multistimulus prompts: The shapes and locations of the prompts.The Psychological Record, 37, 507–521.Google Scholar
  20. Smeets, P. M., Lancioni, G. E., & Striefel, S. (1991). Establishing mirror-image discriminations with progressively delayed extra-stimulus prompts.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52, 197–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Smeets, P. M., & Striefel, S. (1988). Time-delay discrimination training with impulsive children: Self-monitoring nonwait responses and the dimensions of the prompts.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 693–706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Smeets, P. M., & Striefel, S. (1990). Discrimination training of mirror-image stimuli with a delayed-prompt technique: Some critical dimensions of extra-stimulus prompts.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 275–299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Smeets, P. M., Striefel, S., & Hoogeveen, F. R. (1990). Time-delay discrimination training: Replication with different stimuli and different populations.Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11, 217–240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Snell, M. E., & Gast, D. L. (1981). Applying time delay procedure to the instruction of the severely handicapped.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6 (3), 3–14.Google Scholar
  25. Spradlin, J. E. (1985, May).Delayed prompt procedures: They are not as simple as they seem. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
  26. Striefel, S., Bryan, K. S., & Aikins, D. A. (1974). Transfer of stimulus control from motor to verbal stimuli.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 123–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Striefel, S., & Owens, C. R. (1980). Transfer of stimulus control procedures: Applications to language acquisition training with the developmentally handicapped.Behavior Research of Severe Developmental Disabilities, 1, 307–331.Google Scholar
  28. Touchette, P. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 347–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Touchette, P. E., & Howard, J. S. (1984). Errorless learning: reinforcement contingencies and stimulus control transfer in delayed prompting.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 175–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Whitman, T. L. (1990). Self-regulation and mental retardation.American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 347–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Workman, E. A., Helton, G. B., & Watson, P. J. (1982). Self-monitoring effects in a four-year-old child: An ecological behavior analysis.Journal of School Psychology, 20, 57–64.Google Scholar
  32. Zegiob, L., Klukas, N., & Junginger, J. (1978). Reactivity of self-monitoring procedures with retarded adolescents.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 156–163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zigler, E., & Balla, D. (1982). The developmental approach to mental retardation. In E. Zigler & D. Balla (Eds.),Mental retardation: The developmental-difference controversy (pp. 3–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul M. Smeets
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLeiden UniversityHolland

Personalised recommendations