Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 123–138 | Cite as

To what degree was Freud wrong —and how much difference does it make in psychotherapy?

  • Edward Erwin


Public Health Social Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, J. & Condor, T. Whither subliminal psychodynamic activation? A reply to Silver- man.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1982,9, 131–133.Google Scholar
  2. Beloff, H. The structure and origin of the anal character.Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 55, 141–72.Google Scholar
  3. Bergin, A. The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. In A. Bergin & S. Garfield (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: Wiley, 1971.Google Scholar
  4. Bergin, A. & Lambert, M. The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. In S. Garfield & A. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. Bergin, A. & Suinn, R. Individual psychotherapy and behavior therapy.Annual Review of Psychology, 1975,26, 509–556.Google Scholar
  6. Blum, G. A study of the psychoanalytic theory of psychosexual development.Genet. Psychol. Monographs, 1949,39, 3–9.Google Scholar
  7. Brill, N., Koegler, R. Epstein, L. Fogey, E. Controlled study of psychiatric outpatient treatment.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1964,10, 581–595.Google Scholar
  8. Condor, T. & Allen, G. Role of psychoanalytic merging fantasies in systematic desensitization: A rigorous methodological examination.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1980,89, 437–443.Google Scholar
  9. Cordray, D. & Bootzin, R. Placebo control conditions: Tests of theory or of effectiveness?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1983,6, 286–287.Google Scholar
  10. Dixon, N. Apparent changes in the visual threshold as a function of subliminal stimulation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958,10, 211–15.Google Scholar
  11. Duhrssen, A. & Jorswiek, E. An empirical statistical investigation into the efficacy of psychoanalytic therapy.Nervenarzt., 1965,36, 166–9.Google Scholar
  12. Emmelkamp, P. & Straatman, H. (1976) A psychoanalytic reinterpretation of the effectiveness of systematic desensitization: Fact or fiction? Behavioral Research & Therapy, 1976,14, 245–249.Google Scholar
  13. Erwin, E. Behavior therapy: Scientific, philosophical & and moral foundations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  14. Erwin, E. Psychoanalytic therapy: The Eysenck argument.American Psychologist, 1980(a),35, 435–443.Google Scholar
  15. Erwin, E. Psychoanalysis: How firm is the evidence?Nous, 1980(b)XIV, 443–456.Google Scholar
  16. Erwin, E. Is psychotherapy more effective than a placebo? In J. Hariman (Ed.)Does Psychotherapy Really Help People? Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1984(a).Google Scholar
  17. Erwin, E. The standing of psychoanalysis.British Journal of Philosophy Science, 1984(b)35, 115–128.Google Scholar
  18. Erwin, E. Psychotherapy and Freudian psychology. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.)Hans Eysenck: A Psychologist Searching for a Scientific Basis for Human Behavior. London: Falmer Press, 1984(c).Google Scholar
  19. Eysenck, H. J. The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation.Journal of Consulting Psychology. 1952,16, 319–324.Google Scholar
  20. Eysenck, H. J. The effects of psychotherapy. New York: Inter-Science Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  21. Eysenck, H. J. & Wilson, G.The experimental study of Freudian theories. London: Meuthen & Company Ltd, 1973.Google Scholar
  22. Farrell, B. A.The standing of psychoanalysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  23. Fisher, S. & Greenberg, R.The scientific credibility of Freud's theories and therapy. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar
  24. Frank, J. The placebo is psychotherapy.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 291–292.Google Scholar
  25. Friedman, S. An empirical study of the castration and Oedipus complexes.Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1952,46, 61–130.Google Scholar
  26. Glass, G. & Kliegl An apology for research integration in the study of psychotherapy.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983,51, 28–41.Google Scholar
  27. Grünbaum, A. Is Freudian psychoanalytic theory pseudoscientific by Karl Popper's criterion of demarcation?American Philosophical Quarterly, 1979,XVI, 131–141.Google Scholar
  28. Grünbaum, A. Epistemological liabilities of the clinical appraisal of psychoanalytic theory.Nous, 1980,XIV, 307–86.Google Scholar
  29. Grünbaum, A.The foundations of psychoanalysis: a philosophical critique, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, C. & Van de Castle, R. An empirical investigation of the castration complex in dreams. Journal of Personality, 1965,33, 20–27.Google Scholar
  31. Heilbrun, K. Silverman's subliminal psychodynamic activation: A failure to replicate.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1980,89, 560–566.Google Scholar
  32. Kazdin, A. & Wilson, G. T.Evaluation of behavior therapy: issues, evidence and research strategies. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1978.Google Scholar
  33. Kline, P.Fact and fantasy infreudian theory. London: Methuen, 1972, 1981.Google Scholar
  34. Kragh, V. The defense mechanism test: a new method for diagnosis and personnel selection.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1960,44, 303–309.Google Scholar
  35. Lick, J. Expectancy, false galvanic skin response, feedback & systematic desensitization in the modification of phobic behavior.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 1975,43, 557–567.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, N. Theory and experiment relating psychoanalytic displacement to stimulus-responsegeneralization. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 1948, 43, 155–73.Google Scholar
  37. Prioleau, L., Murdock, M. & Brody, N. An analysis of psychotherapy versus placebo studies. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1983,6, 275–285.Google Scholar
  38. Rachman, S. & Wilson, G. T.The effects of psychological therapy. New York: Pergamon, 1980.Google Scholar
  39. Rosenthal, T. Social cueing processes. In M. Hersen, R. Eisler & P.M. Miller (Eds.)Progress in behavior modification, vnVol. 10. New York: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  40. Sarnoff, I. & Corwin, S. Castration anxiety and the fear of death.Journal of Personality, 1959,27, 374–385.Google Scholar
  41. Schwartz, B. An experimental test of two Freudian hypotheses concerning castration anxiety.Journal of Personality, 1956,24, 318–327.Google Scholar
  42. Silverman, L. A comment on two subliminal psychodynamic activation studies.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1982,91, 126–130.Google Scholar
  43. Silverman, L., Frank, S. & Dachinger, P. Psychoanalytic reinterpretation of the effectiveness of systematic desensitization: experimental data bearing on the role of merging fantasies.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1974,83, 313–318.Google Scholar
  44. Silverman, L., Ross, D., Adler, J. & Lustig, D. Simple research paradigm for demonstrating psychodynamic activation: effects of Oedipal stimuli on dart-throwing accuracy in college males.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1978,87, 341–357.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, M., Glass, G. & Miller, T.The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  46. White, R.The abnormal personality. New York: Ronald Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  47. Wolpe, J. Behavior therapy versus psychoanalysis: Therapeutic and social implications.American Psychologist, 1981,36, 159–164.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Erwin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of MiamiCoral Gables

Personalised recommendations