American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 687–703 | Cite as

Cultural phenomena and the research enterprise: Toward a culturally anchored methodology

  • Diane Hughes
  • Edward Seidman
  • Nathaniel Williams
Article

Abstract

Highlights the points at which culture intersects major phases of the research enterprise — problem formulation, population definition, concept and measurement development, research design, methodology, and data analysis — and influences and constrains what researchers deem worthy of investigation and how they interpret what they observe. These ethnocentric biases inhibit the development of a knowledge base for understanding diverse cultural communities. At each step of the research process, the need to carefully examine and expose the underlying cultural assumptions and to generate and develop alternative choices is emphasized. Guidelines are provided to encourage researchers to be aware of and deliberately make choices toward the development of a culturally anchored methodology that balances the demands for rigor and sensitivity.

Key words

cultural sensitivity cross-cultural methodology diversity minority community 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bachman, J. G., & O'Malley, P. M. (1984). Yes-saying, nay-saying, and going to extremes: Black-white differences in response styles.Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 491–509.Google Scholar
  2. Bauman, L. J., & Adair, E. G. (1992). The use of ethnographic interviewing to inform questionnaire construction.Health Education Quarterly, 19, 1–8.Google Scholar
  3. Baumrind, D. (1972). An exploratory study of socialization effects on Black children: Some Black-White comparisons.Child Development, 43, 261–267.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, C. C., Anderson, L. S., Cooper, S., Hassol, L., Klein, D. C., & Rosenblum, G. (Eds.). (1966).Community psychology: A report of the Boston conference on the education of psychologists for community mental health. Boston: Boston University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea.International Journal of Psychology, 19, 335–361.Google Scholar
  6. Blalock, H. M. (1982).Conceptualization and measurement in the social sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979).The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Buchannon, D. R. (1992). An uneasy alliance: Combining qualitative and quantitative research methods.Health Education Quarterly.19(1), 117–135.Google Scholar
  9. Chavis, D., Stucky, P. E., & Wandersman, A. (1983). Returning research to the community: A relationship between scientist and citizen.American Psychologist, 38, 424–434.Google Scholar
  10. D'Andrade, R. G. (1984). Cultural meaning systems. In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (eds.),Cultural theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 88–122). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. de Vries, H., Weijts, W., Dijkstra, M., & Kok, G., (1992). The utilization of qualitative and quantitative data for health education program planning, implementation, and evaluation: A spiral approach.Health Education Quarterly, 19(1), 101–115.Google Scholar
  12. Fairweather, G. W. (1967).Methods for experimental social innovation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Heath, S. B. (1983).Ways with words: Language, life, and work communities and classrooms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Heller, K., & Monohan, J. (1977).Psychology and social change. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  15. Hines, A. M. (1993). Linking qualitative and quantitative methods in cross-cultural survey research: Techniques from cognitive science.American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 729–746.Google Scholar
  16. Howard, A., Scott, R. A. (1981). The study of minority groups in complex societies. In R. H. Munroe, R. L. Munroe, & B. B. Whiting (Eds.),Handbook of cross-cultural human development (pp. 113–152). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  17. Hughes, D., & Dumont, K. (1993). Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research.American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 775–806.Google Scholar
  18. Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20(3), 296–309.Google Scholar
  19. Jorgenson, D. J. (1989).Participant observation: A methodology for human studies, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Kameoka, V. A. (1985). Construct validation of psychological measures in cross-cultural research. Analysis of linear structural relationships. In R. Diaz Guerro (Ed.),Cross-cultural and national studies in social psychology (pp. 57–68). Amsterdam: Elsurer.Google Scholar
  21. Kelley, J. G. (1971). The quest for valid preventive interventions. In G. Rosenblum (Ed.),Issues in community psychology and preventive mental health, New York: Behavioral Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Kluckholn, C. (1949).Mirror for man. New York: Premier Books.Google Scholar
  23. Krantz, D. H., & Shinn, M. (1992).Important interaction effects are hard to detect. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  24. Kuhn, T. S. (1962).The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Laboratory of Human Cognition (1983). Culture and cognitive development. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.),Handbook of child psychology, 4th ed., Vol. 1 (pp. 295–356). New York. Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Laboratory of Human Cognition (1983). Culture and cognitive development. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.),Handbook of child psychology, 4th ed., Vol. 1 (pp. 295–356). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Linney, J. A., & Reppucci, N. D. (1982). Research design and methods in community psychology. In P. C. Kendall & J. N. Butcher (Eds.),Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 535–566). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Marin, G., & Marin, B. V. (1991).Research with Hispanic populations. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for emotion, cognition, and motivation.Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.Google Scholar
  29. Maruyama, M. (1983). Cross-cultural perspectives on social and community change. In E. Seidman (Ed.),Handbook of social intervention. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Maruyama, M. (1980). Mindscapes and science theories.Current Anthropology, 21, 589–610.Google Scholar
  31. Maton, K. I. (1993). A bridge between cultures: Linked ethnographic-empirical methodology for culture-anchored research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 747–773.Google Scholar
  32. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects.Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.Google Scholar
  33. McLoyd, V. C., & Randolph, S. (1985). Secular trends in the study of Afro-American children: A review of child development. In A. B. Smuts & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), History and research in child development.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(4–5 Serial No. 211).Google Scholar
  34. O'Brien, K. O. (1993). Improving survey questionnaires through focus groups. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.),Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 105–117). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Rapkin, B. D., & Luke, D. A. (1993). Cluster analysis in community research: Epistemology and practice.American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 247–277.Google Scholar
  36. Rappaport, J. (1977).Community psychology: Values, research and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  37. Rohner, R. P. (1984). Toward a conception of culture for cross-cultural psychology.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 111–138.Google Scholar
  38. Ryan, W. (1971).Blaming the victim. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  39. Sarason, S. B. (1971).The culture of school and the problem of change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  40. Schofield, J. W., & Anderson, K. (1987). Combining quantitative and qualitative components of research on ethnic identity and intergroup relations. in J. S. Phinney & M. J. Rotheram (Eds.),Children's ethnic socialization: Pluralism and development (pp. 252–273). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Seidman, E. (1978). Justice, values and social science: Unexamined premises. In R. J. Simon (Ed.),Research in law and sociology (pp. 175–200). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  42. Seidman, E. (1983). Unexamined premises of social problem-solving. In E. Seidman (Ed.),Handbook of social intervention. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Seidman, E., & Rappaport, J. (1986).Redefining social problems. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  44. Serrano-Garcia, I. (1984). The illusion of empowerment: Community development within a colonial context. In J. Rappaport, C. Swift, & R. Hess (Eds.),Studies in empowerment: Steps toward understanding and action (pp. 173–200). New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
  45. Susskind, E. C., & Klein, D. C. (Eds.). (1985).Community research: Methods, paradigms, and applications. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  46. Spradley, J. (1970).You owe yourself a drunk. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  47. Tanaka-Matsumi, J., & Marsella, A. J. (1976). Cross-cultural variations in the phenomenological experience of depression: Word association.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 7, 379–396.Google Scholar
  48. Tolan, P., Keys, C., Chertok, F., & Jason, L. (1990).Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  49. Triandis, H. (1978). Some universals of social behavior.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
  50. Vega, W. A. (1992). Theoretical and pragmatic implications of cultural diversity for community research.American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 375–391.Google Scholar
  51. Ward, M. C. (1971).Them children: A study in language and learning. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
  52. Wolff, B., Knodel, J., & Sittitrai, W. (1993). Focus groups and surveys as complementary research methods: A case example. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.),Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 118–138). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane Hughes
    • 1
  • Edward Seidman
    • 1
  • Nathaniel Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Community Research and Action, Psychology DepartmentNew York UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations