# New optimality principles for economic efficiency and equilibrium

- 376 Downloads
- 108 Citations

## Abstract

This paper develops several optimization principles relating the fundamental concepts of Pareto efficiency and competitive equilibria. The beginning point for this development is the introduction of a new function describing individual preferences, closely related to willingness-to-pay, termed the benefit function. An important property of the benefit function is that it can be summed across individuals to obtain a meaningful measure of total benefit relative to a given set of utility levels; and the optimization principles presented in the paper are based on maximization of this total benefit.

Specifically, it is shown that, under appropriate technical assumptions, a Pareto-efficient allocation*X* maximizes the total benefit relative to the utility levels it yields. Conversely, if an allocation*X* yields zero benefit and maximizes the total benefit function, then that allocation is Pareto efficient. The Lagrange multipliers*p* of the benefit maximization problem serve as prices; and the (*X,p*) pair satisfies a generalized saddle-point property termed a Lagrange equilibrium. This in turn is equivalent, under appropriate assumptions, to a competitive equilibrium.

There are natural duals to all of the results stated above. The dual optimization principle is based on a surplus function which is a function of prices. The surplus is the total income generated at prices*p*, minus the total income required to obtain given utility levels. The dual optimization principle states that prices that are dual (or indirect) Pareto efficient minimize total surplus and render it zero. Conversely, a set of prices that minimizes total surplus and renders it zero is a dual Pareto efficient set of prices.

The results of the paper can be viewed as augmenting the first and second theorems of welfare economics (and their duals) to provide a family of results that relate the important economic concepts of Pareto efficiency, equilibrium, dual (or indirect) Pareto efficiency, total benefit, Lagrange equilibrium, and total surplus.

## Key Words

Pareto efficiency welfare theorems benefit functions duality## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.
- 2.Negishi, T.,
*Welfare Economics and the Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy*, Metroeconomica, Vol. 20, pp. 92–97, 1968.Google Scholar - 3.Luenberger, D. G.,
*Dual Pareto Efficiency*, Working Paper, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1990.Google Scholar - 4.
- 5.Luenberger, D. G.,
*Benefit Functions and Duality*, Journal of Mathematical Economics (to appear).Google Scholar - 6.Arrow, K. J.,
*An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics*, Proceedings of the 2nd Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, Berkeley, California, pp. 507–532, 1951.Google Scholar - 7.Debreu, G.,
*Theory of Value*, Cowles Foundation Monograph, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1959.Google Scholar - 8.Lerner, A. P.,
*The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power*, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 1, pp. 157–175, 1934.Google Scholar - 9.Groves, T.,
*Efficient Collective Choice When Compensation Is Possible*, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 46, pp. 227–241, 1979.Google Scholar - 10.Dierker, E., andLenninghaus, J.,
*Surplus Maximization and Pareto Optimality*, Contributions to Mathematical Economics, Edited by W. Hildebrand and A. Mas-Colell, North-Holland, Amsterdam, Holland, pp. 143–166, 1986.Google Scholar - 11.Edgeworth, F. Y.,
*Mathematical Psychics*, Reprint, London School of Economics, London, England, 1932.Google Scholar - 12.Hotelling, H.,
*Edgeworth's Taxation Paradox and the Nature of Demand and Supply Functions*, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 40, pp. 577–616, 1932.Google Scholar - 13.McFadden, D.,
*Cost, Revenue, and Profit Functions*, Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, Edited by M. Fuss and D. McFadden, North-Holland, Amsterdam, Holland, Vol. 1, pp. 3–109, 1978.Google Scholar - 14.Jorgenson, D. W., andLau, L. J.,
*The Duality of Technology and Economic Behavior*, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 41, pp. 181–200, 1974.Google Scholar - 15.Luenberger, D. G.,
*Optimization by Vector Space Methods*, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1969.Google Scholar - 16.Diewert, W. E.,
*Applications of Duality Theory*, Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Edited by M. D. Intrilligator and D. A. Kendrick, North-Holland, Amsterdam, Holland, Vol. 2, pp. 106–171, 1974.Google Scholar - 17.Milleron, J. C.,
*Duality in Consumer Behavior Analysis*, Reprint, Institute National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques, Paris, France, 1968.Google Scholar - 18.Weddepohl, N. H.,
*Duality and Equilibrium*, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, Vol. 32, pp. 163–187, 1972.Google Scholar - 19.Balasko, Y.,
*Budget Constrained Pareto-Efficient Allocations*, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 21, pp. 359–379, 1979.Google Scholar - 20.Balasko, Y.,
*Foundations of the Theory of General Equilibrium*, Academic Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1988.Google Scholar - 21.Keiding, H.,
*Existence of Budget-Constrained Pareto-Efficient Allocations*, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 24, pp. 393–397, 1981.Google Scholar - 22.Svensson, L. G.,
*The Existence of Budget-Constrained Pareto-Efficient Allocations*, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 32, pp. 346–350, 1984.Google Scholar - 23.Luenberger, D. G.,
*Optimality and the Theory of Value*, Working Paper, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1991.Google Scholar - 24.Luenberger, D. G.,
*Quasi-Convex Programming*, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 16, pp. 1090–1095, 1968.Google Scholar - 25.Rockafellar, R. T.,
*Convex Analysis*, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1970.Google Scholar