Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Current issues in memory of action events

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arbuckle, T. Y., & Cuddy, L. L. (1969). Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 126–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman, L. (1985). Further evidence for the lack of adult age differences on free recall of subject-performed tasks: The importance of motor action.Human Learning, 4, 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1984). Aging effects in free recall: An exception to the rule.Human Learning, 3, 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1985). Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance.Experimental Aging Research, 11,67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman, L., Nilsson, L.-G., & Chalom, D. (1986). New evidence on the nature of the encoding of action events.Memory & Cognition, 14,339–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events.Memory & Cognition, 11, 575–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1984). Individual differences in event memory: A case for nonstrategic factors.Memory Cognition, 12, 633–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1985). On the generality of the laws of memory. In L.-G. Nilsson & T. Archer (Eds.),Animal learning and human memory, (pp. 247–277). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1988). Metamemory for words and enacted instructions: Predicting which items will be recalled.Memory Cognition, 16, 452–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1989 a). Memory for action events: The power of enactment.Educational Psychology Review, 1, 57–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1989 b). The effects of interference tasks on recency in the free recall of action events.Psychological Research, 51, 176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L., & Bean, G. (1983). Memory in educable mentally retarded adults: Deficit in subject or experimenter.Intelligence, 7, 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L., & Bryant, S. (1991). The role of duration in memory and metamemory of enacted instructions.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).

  • Cohen, R. L., Peterson, M., & Mantini-Atkinson, T. (1987 a). Interevent differences in event memory: Why are some events more recallable than others?Memory & Cognition, 15,109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L., Sandler, S. P., & Schroeder, K. (1987b). Aging and memory for words and action events: Effects of item repetition and list length.Psychology and Aging, 2, 280–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L., & Stewart, M. (1982). How to avoid developmental effects in free recall.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M., Engelkamp, J., & Mohr, G. (1991). Memory of imagined actions: Imagining oneself or another person.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).

  • Dick, M. B., Kean, M. L., & Sands, D. (1989). Memory for action events in Alzheimer-Type dementia: Further evidence of an encoding failure.Brain and Cognition, 9, 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1986). Nouns and verbs in paired-associate learning: Instructional effects.Psychological Research, 48, 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1988). Modality-specific encoding and word class in verbal learning. In M. Gruneberg, P. Moms, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory (Vol. 1, pp. 415–420. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1989). Memory for performed and imaged noun pairs and verb pairs: A comment on Tore Helstrup.Psychological Research, 50, 241–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1990 a). Memory of action events and some implications for imagery. In C. Cornoldi & M. McDaniel (Eds.),Imagery and Cognition (pp. 183–219). New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1990b).Das menschliche Gedüchtnis. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Krumnacker, H. (1980). Imaginale und motorische Prozesse beim Behalten verbalen Materials.Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 27,511–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., Mohr, G., & Zimmer, H. D. (1991). Pair-relational encoding of performed nouns and verbs.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1983). Zum Einfluß von Wahrnehmen und Tun auf das Behalten von Verb-Objekt-Phrasen.Sprache & Kognition, 2, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Motor program information as a separable memory unit.Psychological Research, 46, 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Motor programs and their relation to semantic memory.German Journal of Psychology, 9, 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Memory for action events: A new field of research.Psychological Research, 51, 153–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1990). Imagery and action: Differential encoding of verbs and nouns. In P. J. Hampson, D. F. Marks, & J. T. E. Richardson (Eds.),Imagery: Current developments (pp. 150–168). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., & Denis, M. (1989). Paired associate learning of action verbs with visual- or motor-imaginal encoding instructions.Psychological Research, 50, 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., & Mohr, G. (1990). Differential memory effects of concrete nouns and action verbs.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 198,189–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M. A., Bouffard, V., Raag, T., & Di Santo-Rose, M. (1991). The effects of enactive encoding, type of movement and imagined perspective on memory for dance.Psychological Research 53, (this issue).

  • Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 556–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup, T. (1987). One, two, or three memories? A problem-solving approach to memory for performed acts.Acta Psychologica, 66, 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup, T. (1989). Memory for performed and imaged noun pairs and verb pairs.Psychological Research, 50, 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup, T. (1991). Integration versus nonintegration of noun pairs and verb pairs under enactment and nonenactment conditions.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).

  • Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20,497–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kausler, D. H. (1989). Impairment in normal memory aging: Implications of laboratory evidence. In G. C. Gillmore, P. J. Whitehouse, & M. L. Wykle (Eds.),Memory and aging, (pp. 4–40). New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kausler, D. H., & Hakami, M. K. (1983). Memory for activities: Adult age differences and intentionality.Developmental Psychology, 19, 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kausler, D. H., Lichty, W., & Freund, J. S. (1985). Adult age differences in recognition memory and frequency judgments for planned activities.Developmental Psychology, 21, 647–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopf, M. (1991). Having shaved a kiwi fruit: Memory of novel self-performed actions.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).

  • Knopf, M., & Neidhardt, E. (1989). Geddchtnis für Handlungen unterschiedlicher Vertrautheit — Hinweise aus entwicklungspsychologischen Studien.Sprache & Kognition, 8, 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Druch, A. (1991). The contextualization of input and output events in memory.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).

  • Lichty, W., Bressie, S., & Krell, R. (1988). When a fork is not a fork: Recall of performed activities as a function of age, generation, and bizarreness. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory, (Vol. 2, pp. 506–511). Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichty, W., Kausler, D. H., & Martinez, D. R. (1986). Adult age differences in memory for motor versus cognitive activities.Experimental Aging Research, 12, 227–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelace, F. A. (1984). Meta-memory: Monitoring future recallability during study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 756–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschark, M., Richman, C. L., Yuille, J. C., & Hunt, R. R. (1987). The role of imagery in memory: On shared and distinctive information.Psychological Bulletin, 102, 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., & Lollis, T. (1988). Qualitative and quantitative consideratins in encoding difficulty effect.Memory & Cognition, 16, 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, G., Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Recall and recognition of self-performed acts.Psychological Research, 51, 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, L. G., & Bäckman, L. (1991). Encoding dimensions of subject-performed tasks.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).

  • Nilsson, L. G., & Cohen, R. L. (1988). Enrichment and generation in the recall of enacted and non-enacted instructions. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory (Vol. 1, pp. 427–432). Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, M. P., & West, R. L. (1991). Age differences in the recall of actions and cognitive activities: The effects of presentation rate and object cues.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).

  • Nyberg, L., Nilsson, L.-G., & Bäckman, L. (1991). A component analysis of action events.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).

  • Ratner, H. H., & Hill, L. (1991). The development of children's action memory: When do actions speak louder than words?Psychological Research,53, (this issue).

  • Saltz, E. (1988). The role of motoric enactment (M-processing) in memory for words and sentences. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 408–414). Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltz, E., & Dixon, D. (1982). Let's pretend: The role of motoric imagery in memory for sentences and words.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltz, E., & Donnenwerth-Nolan, S. (1981). Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20,322–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. J. (1966). Individual and group predictions of item difficulty for free learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 673–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1984).Enkodierung, Rekodierung, Retrieval und die Aktivation motorischer Programme (Arbeiten der FR Psychologie Nr. 91). Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1991). Memory after motoric encoding in a generation-recognition model.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).

  • Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1984). Planungs- und Ausführungsanteile motorischer Gedächtniskomponenten und ihre Wirkung auf das Behalten ihrer verbalen Bezeichnungen.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 192, 379–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1985). An attempt to distinguish between kinematic and motor memory components.Acta Psychologica, 58, 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1989a). Does motor encoding enhance relational information?Psychological Research, 51, 158–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1989b). One, two or three memories: Some comments and new findings.Acta Psychologica, 70, 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., Engelkamp, J., & Sieloff, U. (1984). Motorische Gedächtniskomponenten als partiell unabhängige Komponenten des Engramms verbaler Handlungsbeschreibungen.Sprache & Kognition, 3, 70–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of the Saarland, W-6600, Saarbrücken 11, Germany

    Johannes Engelkamp

  2. Department of Psychology, Glendon College, York University, 2275 Bayview Avenue, M4N 3M6, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Ronald L. Cohen

Authors
  1. Johannes Engelkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald L. Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelkamp, J., Cohen, R.L. Current issues in memory of action events. Psychol. Res 53, 175–182 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00941384

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00941384

Keywords

Search

Navigation