Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 175–182 | Cite as

Current issues in memory of action events

  • Johannes Engelkamp
  • Ronald L. Cohen
Article

Keywords

Action Event Current Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arbuckle, T. Y., & Cuddy, L. L. (1969). Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 126–131.Google Scholar
  2. Bäckman, L. (1985). Further evidence for the lack of adult age differences on free recall of subject-performed tasks: The importance of motor action.Human Learning, 4, 79–87.Google Scholar
  3. Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1984). Aging effects in free recall: An exception to the rule.Human Learning, 3, 53–69.Google Scholar
  4. Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1985). Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance.Experimental Aging Research, 11,67–73.Google Scholar
  5. Bäckman, L., Nilsson, L.-G., & Chalom, D. (1986). New evidence on the nature of the encoding of action events.Memory & Cognition, 14,339–346.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267–281.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events.Memory & Cognition, 11, 575–582.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, R. L. (1984). Individual differences in event memory: A case for nonstrategic factors.Memory Cognition, 12, 633–641.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, R. L. (1985). On the generality of the laws of memory. In L.-G. Nilsson & T. Archer (Eds.),Animal learning and human memory, (pp. 247–277). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, R. L. (1988). Metamemory for words and enacted instructions: Predicting which items will be recalled.Memory Cognition, 16, 452–460.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, R. L. (1989 a). Memory for action events: The power of enactment.Educational Psychology Review, 1, 57–80.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, R. L. (1989 b). The effects of interference tasks on recency in the free recall of action events.Psychological Research, 51, 176–180.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, R. L., & Bean, G. (1983). Memory in educable mentally retarded adults: Deficit in subject or experimenter.Intelligence, 7, 287–298.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, R. L., & Bryant, S. (1991). The role of duration in memory and metamemory of enacted instructions.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, R. L., Peterson, M., & Mantini-Atkinson, T. (1987 a). Interevent differences in event memory: Why are some events more recallable than others?Memory & Cognition, 15,109–118.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, R. L., Sandler, S. P., & Schroeder, K. (1987b). Aging and memory for words and action events: Effects of item repetition and list length.Psychology and Aging, 2, 280–285.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, R. L., & Stewart, M. (1982). How to avoid developmental effects in free recall.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 9–16.Google Scholar
  18. Denis, M., Engelkamp, J., & Mohr, G. (1991). Memory of imagined actions: Imagining oneself or another person.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).Google Scholar
  19. Dick, M. B., Kean, M. L., & Sands, D. (1989). Memory for action events in Alzheimer-Type dementia: Further evidence of an encoding failure.Brain and Cognition, 9, 71–87.Google Scholar
  20. Engelkamp, J. (1986). Nouns and verbs in paired-associate learning: Instructional effects.Psychological Research, 48, 153–159.Google Scholar
  21. Engelkamp, J. (1988). Modality-specific encoding and word class in verbal learning. In M. Gruneberg, P. Moms, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory (Vol. 1, pp. 415–420. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Engelkamp, J. (1989). Memory for performed and imaged noun pairs and verb pairs: A comment on Tore Helstrup.Psychological Research, 50, 241–242.Google Scholar
  23. Engelkamp, J. (1990 a). Memory of action events and some implications for imagery. In C. Cornoldi & M. McDaniel (Eds.),Imagery and Cognition (pp. 183–219). New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Engelkamp, J. (1990b).Das menschliche Gedüchtnis. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  25. Engelkamp, J., & Krumnacker, H. (1980). Imaginale und motorische Prozesse beim Behalten verbalen Materials.Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 27,511–533.Google Scholar
  26. Engelkamp, J., Mohr, G., & Zimmer, H. D. (1991). Pair-relational encoding of performed nouns and verbs.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).Google Scholar
  27. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1983). Zum Einfluß von Wahrnehmen und Tun auf das Behalten von Verb-Objekt-Phrasen.Sprache & Kognition, 2, 117–127.Google Scholar
  28. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Motor program information as a separable memory unit.Psychological Research, 46, 283–299.Google Scholar
  29. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Motor programs and their relation to semantic memory.German Journal of Psychology, 9, 239–254.Google Scholar
  30. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Memory for action events: A new field of research.Psychological Research, 51, 153–157.Google Scholar
  31. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1990). Imagery and action: Differential encoding of verbs and nouns. In P. J. Hampson, D. F. Marks, & J. T. E. Richardson (Eds.),Imagery: Current developments (pp. 150–168). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  32. Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., & Denis, M. (1989). Paired associate learning of action verbs with visual- or motor-imaginal encoding instructions.Psychological Research, 50, 257–263.Google Scholar
  33. Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., & Mohr, G. (1990). Differential memory effects of concrete nouns and action verbs.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 198,189–216.Google Scholar
  34. Foley, M. A., Bouffard, V., Raag, T., & Di Santo-Rose, M. (1991). The effects of enactive encoding, type of movement and imagined perspective on memory for dance.Psychological Research 53, (this issue).Google Scholar
  35. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 556–588.Google Scholar
  36. Helstrup, T. (1987). One, two, or three memories? A problem-solving approach to memory for performed acts.Acta Psychologica, 66, 37–68.Google Scholar
  37. Helstrup, T. (1989). Memory for performed and imaged noun pairs and verb pairs.Psychological Research, 50, 237–240.Google Scholar
  38. Helstrup, T. (1991). Integration versus nonintegration of noun pairs and verb pairs under enactment and nonenactment conditions.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).Google Scholar
  39. Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20,497–514.Google Scholar
  40. Kausler, D. H. (1989). Impairment in normal memory aging: Implications of laboratory evidence. In G. C. Gillmore, P. J. Whitehouse, & M. L. Wykle (Eds.),Memory and aging, (pp. 4–40). New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Kausler, D. H., & Hakami, M. K. (1983). Memory for activities: Adult age differences and intentionality.Developmental Psychology, 19, 37–68.Google Scholar
  42. Kausler, D. H., Lichty, W., & Freund, J. S. (1985). Adult age differences in recognition memory and frequency judgments for planned activities.Developmental Psychology, 21, 647–654.Google Scholar
  43. Knopf, M. (1991). Having shaved a kiwi fruit: Memory of novel self-performed actions.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).Google Scholar
  44. Knopf, M., & Neidhardt, E. (1989). Geddchtnis für Handlungen unterschiedlicher Vertrautheit — Hinweise aus entwicklungspsychologischen Studien.Sprache & Kognition, 8, 203–215.Google Scholar
  45. Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Druch, A. (1991). The contextualization of input and output events in memory.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).Google Scholar
  46. Lichty, W., Bressie, S., & Krell, R. (1988). When a fork is not a fork: Recall of performed activities as a function of age, generation, and bizarreness. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory, (Vol. 2, pp. 506–511). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Lichty, W., Kausler, D. H., & Martinez, D. R. (1986). Adult age differences in memory for motor versus cognitive activities.Experimental Aging Research, 12, 227–330.Google Scholar
  48. Lovelace, F. A. (1984). Meta-memory: Monitoring future recallability during study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 756–766.Google Scholar
  49. Marschark, M., Richman, C. L., Yuille, J. C., & Hunt, R. R. (1987). The role of imagery in memory: On shared and distinctive information.Psychological Bulletin, 102, 28–41.Google Scholar
  50. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., & Lollis, T. (1988). Qualitative and quantitative consideratins in encoding difficulty effect.Memory & Cognition, 16, 8–14.Google Scholar
  51. Mohr, G., Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Recall and recognition of self-performed acts.Psychological Research, 51, 181–187.Google Scholar
  52. Nilsson, L. G., & Bäckman, L. (1991). Encoding dimensions of subject-performed tasks.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).Google Scholar
  53. Nilsson, L. G., & Cohen, R. L. (1988). Enrichment and generation in the recall of enacted and non-enacted instructions. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory (Vol. 1, pp. 427–432). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Norris, M. P., & West, R. L. (1991). Age differences in the recall of actions and cognitive activities: The effects of presentation rate and object cues.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).Google Scholar
  55. Nyberg, L., Nilsson, L.-G., & Bäckman, L. (1991). A component analysis of action events.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).Google Scholar
  56. Ratner, H. H., & Hill, L. (1991). The development of children's action memory: When do actions speak louder than words?Psychological Research,53, (this issue).Google Scholar
  57. Saltz, E. (1988). The role of motoric enactment (M-processing) in memory for words and sentences. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 408–414). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Saltz, E., & Dixon, D. (1982). Let's pretend: The role of motoric imagery in memory for sentences and words.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 77–92.Google Scholar
  59. Saltz, E., & Donnenwerth-Nolan, S. (1981). Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20,322–332.Google Scholar
  60. Underwood, B. J. (1966). Individual and group predictions of item difficulty for free learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 673–679.Google Scholar
  61. Zimmer, H. D. (1984).Enkodierung, Rekodierung, Retrieval und die Aktivation motorischer Programme (Arbeiten der FR Psychologie Nr. 91). Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
  62. Zimmer, H. D. (1991). Memory after motoric encoding in a generation-recognition model.Psychological Research,53, (this issue).Google Scholar
  63. Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1984). Planungs- und Ausführungsanteile motorischer Gedächtniskomponenten und ihre Wirkung auf das Behalten ihrer verbalen Bezeichnungen.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 192, 379–402.Google Scholar
  64. Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1985). An attempt to distinguish between kinematic and motor memory components.Acta Psychologica, 58, 81–106.Google Scholar
  65. Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1989a). Does motor encoding enhance relational information?Psychological Research, 51, 158–167.Google Scholar
  66. Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1989b). One, two or three memories: Some comments and new findings.Acta Psychologica, 70, 293–304.Google Scholar
  67. Zimmer, H. D., Engelkamp, J., & Sieloff, U. (1984). Motorische Gedächtniskomponenten als partiell unabhängige Komponenten des Engramms verbaler Handlungsbeschreibungen.Sprache & Kognition, 3, 70–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Engelkamp
    • 1
  • Ronald L. Cohen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of the SaarlandSaarbrücken 11Germany
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Glendon CollegeYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations