Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 177, Issue 3–4, pp 213–219 | Cite as

Taxonomic status of the species of the green algal genusNeochloris

  • T. R. Deason
  • P. C. Silva
  • S. Watanabe
  • G. L. Floyd
Short communication

Abstract

Komárek has recently reviewed the various species assigned to the green algal genusNeochlorisStarr (Chlorococcales, Chlorococcaceae) and removed those with uninucleate vegetative cells to a new genus,Ettlia.Watanabe & Floyd, unaware ofKomárek's work, also reviewed the species ofNeochloris and distributed them among three genera—Neochloris, Chlorococcopsis gen. nov., andParietochloris gen. nov.—on the basis of details of the covering of the zoospore and the arrangement of the basal bodies of the flagellar apparatus. This paper reconciles these two treatments and makes additional recommendations at the ranks of genus, family, order, and class.

Key words

Algal taxonomy Chlorophyceae Pleurastrophyceae Chlorococcales Sphaeropleales Sphaeropleaceae Hydrodictyaceae Neochloridaceae Chlorococcopsis Ettlia Neochloris Parietochloris 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arce, G., Bold, H. C., 1958: SomeChlorophyceae from Cuban soils. — Amer. J. Bot.45: 492–503.Google Scholar
  2. Archibald, P. A., 1973: The genusNeochloris Starr (Chlorophyceae, Chlorococcales). — Phycologia12: 187–193.Google Scholar
  3. , 1971: Reclassification of three unicellular green algae. — Phytomorphology20: 383–389.Google Scholar
  4. Bischoff, H. W., Bold, H. C., 1963: Phycological studies IV. Some soil algae from Enchanted Rock and related algal species. — Univ. Texas Publ. No.6318: 1–95.Google Scholar
  5. Bold, H. C., 1958: Three new chlorophycean algae. — Amer. J. Bot.45: 737–743.Google Scholar
  6. , 1978: Introduction to the algae. — Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. , 1985: Introduction to the algae. 2nd edn. — Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Buchheim, M. A., Hoffman, L. R., 1986: Ultrastructure of male gametes ofSphaeroplea robusta (Chlorophyceae). — J. Phycol.22: 176–185.Google Scholar
  9. Cáceres, E. J., Robinson, D. G., 1981: Ultrastructural studies onSphaeroplea annulina (Chlorophyceae). II. Spermatogenesis and male gamete structure. — J. Phycol.17: 173–180.Google Scholar
  10. Chantanachat, S., Bold, H. C., 1962: Phycological studies. II. Some algae from arid soils. — Univ. Texas Publ. No.6218: 1–75.Google Scholar
  11. Deason, T. R., Bold, H. C., 1960: Phycological studies. I. Exploratory studies of Texas soil algae. — Univ. Texas Publ. No.6022: 1–72.Google Scholar
  12. Drouet, F., Dailey, W. A., 1956: Revision of the coccoidMyxophyceae. — Butler Univ. Bot. Studies12: 1–218.Google Scholar
  13. Ettl, H., Komárek, J., 1982: Was versteht man unter dem Begriff „coccale Grünalgen“? — Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl.60: 345–374.Google Scholar
  14. Floyd, G. L., Watanabe, S., 1990: Comparative ultrastructure of eight species ofCharacium (Chlorophyceae). — J. Phycol. (Suppl.)26: 11.Google Scholar
  15. Groover, R. D., Bold, H. C., 1969: Phycological studies. VIII: The taxonomy and comparative physiology of theChlorosarcinales and certain other edaphic algae. — Univ. Texas. Publ. No.6907: 1–165.Google Scholar
  16. Hawkins, A. F., Leedale, G. F., 1971: Zoospore structure and colony formation inPediastrum spp. andHydrodictyon reticulatum (L.)Lagerheim. — Ann. Bot.35: 201–211.Google Scholar
  17. Herndon, W. R., 1958: Some new species of chlorococcacean algae. — Amer. J. Bot.45: 308–323.Google Scholar
  18. Hilse, F. W., 1861: Beiträge zur Algen- und Diatomeen-Kunde Schlesiens, insbesondere Strehlens. — Jahres-Ber. Schles. Ges. Vaterl. Kult.38: 75–86.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman, L. R., 1984: Male gametes ofAtractomorpha echinata Hoffman (Chlorophyceae). — J. Phycol.20: 573–584.Google Scholar
  20. Iyengar, M. O. P., Desikachary, T. V., 1981:Volvocales. — New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
  21. Kantz, T. S., Theriot, E. C., Zimmer, E. A., Chapman, R. L., 1990: ThePleurastrophyceae andMicromonadophyceae: a cladistic analysis of nuclear rRNA sequence data. — J. Phycol.26: 711–721.Google Scholar
  22. Komárek, J., 1989: Polynuclearity of vegetative cells in coccal green algae from the familyNeochloridaceae. — Arch. Protistenk.137: 255–273.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, L. A., 1990: Molecular phylogenetic analysis ofNeochloris (Chlorophyceae). — J. Phycol. (Suppl.)26: 4.Google Scholar
  24. Luerssen, C., 1877: Grundzüge der Botanik. — Leipzig.Google Scholar
  25. Marchant, H. J., Pickett-Heaps, J. D., 1972: Ultrastructure and differentiation ofHydrodictyon reticulatum. III. Formation of the vegetative daughter net. — Austral. J. Biol. Sci.25: 265–278.Google Scholar
  26. Mattox, K. R., Stewart, K. D., 1984: Classification of the green algae: a concept based on comparative cytology. — InIrvine, D. E. G., John, D. M., (Eds.): Systematics of the green algae, pp. 29–72. — Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. O'Kelly, C. J., Floyd, G. L., 1984: Flagellar apparatus and the phylogeny of the green algae. — BioSystems16: 227–251.Google Scholar
  28. Rabenhorst, L., 1861: Die Algen Europa's. Decades 103/104, nos. 1021–1040. — Dresden. (Exsiccata with printed labels.)Google Scholar
  29. - 1868: Flora europaea algarum aquae dulcis et submarinae. Sectio III. — Lipsia (Leipzig).Google Scholar
  30. Sluiman, H. J., 1989: The green algal classUlvophyceae: an ultrastructural survey and classification. — Crypt. Bot.1: 83–94.Google Scholar
  31. Starr, R. C., 1954: Further studies in the genusChlorococcum Meneghini. — Lloydia16: 142–148.Google Scholar
  32. , 1955: A comparative study ofChlorococcum Meneghini and other spherical, zoosporeproducing genera of theChlorococcales. — Indiana Univ. Publ. Sci. Ser. No.20: 1–111.Google Scholar
  33. Vinatzer, G., 1975: Neue Bodenalgen aus den Dolomiten. — Pl. Syst. Evol.123: 213–235.Google Scholar
  34. Watanabe, S., 1983: New and interesting green algae from soils of some Asian and Oceanic regions. — Arch. Protistenk.127: 223–270.Google Scholar
  35. , 1990: Comparative ultrastructure of the zoospores of nine species ofNeochloris (Chlorophyta). — Pl. Syst. Evol.168: 195–219.Google Scholar
  36. , 1988: Ultrastructure of the zoospores and vegetative cells ofTetraedron andChlorotetraedron (Chlorophyceae). — J. Phycol.24: 490–495.Google Scholar
  37. Wilcox, L. W., Floyd, G. L., 1988: Ultrastructure of the gamete ofPediastrum duplex (Chlorophyceae). — J. Phycol.24: 140–146.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. R. Deason
    • 1
  • P. C. Silva
    • 2
  • S. Watanabe
    • 3
  • G. L. Floyd
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.HerbariumUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyFaculty of Education, Toyama UniversityToyamaJapan
  4. 4.Department of Plant BiologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations