Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 158, Issue 2–4, pp 87–96 | Cite as

“Self-tanning”—a new and important source of stoichiometric error in cytophotometric determination of nuclear DNA content in plants

  • Johann Greilhuber
Article

Abstract

A Feulgen-densitometric comparison of nuclear DNA contents (C-values) was performed in various plant species (a fern, four gymnosperms, 16 woody and herbaceous angiosperms) after two types of fixation, additive (neutral formaldehyde) and non-additive (methanol-acetic acid, 3:1, MAA). Nuclei from tissues containing a significant amount of polyphenols (of the hydrolysable and non-hydrolysable tannin type) always showed reduced stainability and distorted spectral absorbance curves after MAA-fixation, while after formaldehyde-fixation no evidence for distorted staining was found. No fixation-dependent differences in Feulgen-DNA contents were stated in nuclei from tissues having no polyphenols. Distorted Feulgen-staining is a consequence of cellular self-tanning during fixation. Tanning is impaired by formaldehyde which binds to tannins and inactivates them. The rationale for using formaldehyde as a fixative in Feulgen-cytophotometry can be mainly seen in its capability of eliminating the “self-tanning error”. Standardization in plant DNA cytophotometry, and recent reports on unorthodox nuclear DNA variation in conifers are critically discussed.

Key words

Feulgen cytophotometry DNA contents genome size tannins 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett, M. D., Smith, J. B., 1976: Nuclar DNA amounts in angiosperms. — Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B,274, 227–274.Google Scholar
  2. Berlyn, G. P., Berlyn, M. K. B., Beck, R. C., 1986: A comparison of internal standards for plant cytophotometry. — Stain Technol.61, 297–302.Google Scholar
  3. —, 1987: DNA content polymorphism and tissue culture regeneration in Caribbean pine. — Canad. J. Bot.65, 954–961.Google Scholar
  4. Deumling, B., Greilhuber, J., 1982: Characterization of heterochromatin in different species of theScilla siberica group (Liliaceae) by in situ hybridization of satellite DNAs and fluorochrome banding. — Chromosoma (Berlin)84, 535–555.Google Scholar
  5. Dhillon, S. S., Berlyn, G. P., Miksche, J. P., 1977: Requirement of an internal standard for microspectrophotometric measurements of DNA. — Amer. J. Bot.64, 117–121.Google Scholar
  6. Endres, H., 1962: Gerbstoffe: chemisch technologischer Teil. — InRegel, C. von, Cramer, J., (Eds.): Die Rohstoffe des Pflanzenreichs: 5. Auflage, 1. Lieferung; pp. 1–162 — Weinheim.Google Scholar
  7. Feulgen, R., Rossenbeck, H., 1924: Mikroskopisch-chemischer Nachweis einer Nucleinsäure vom Typus der Thymonucleinsäure und die darauf beruhende elektive Färbung von Zellkernen in mikroskopischen Präparaten. — Z. physiol. Chemie135, 203–248.Google Scholar
  8. Fox, D. P., 1969: Some characteristics of the cold hydrolysis technique for staining plant tissues by the Feulgen reaction. — J. Histochem. Cytochem.17, 266–272.Google Scholar
  9. Graumann, W., 1952: Zur Standardisierung des Schiffschen Reagens. — Z. wiss. Mikrosk. mikrosk. Technik61, 225–226.Google Scholar
  10. Greilhuber, J., 1977: Nuclear DNA and heterochromatin contents in theScilla hohenackeri group,S. persica, andPuschkinia scilloides (Liliaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.128, 243–257.Google Scholar
  11. —, 1986: Severely distorted Feulgen-DNA amounts inPinus (Coniferophytina) after non-additive fixations as a result of meristematic self-tanning with vacuole contents. — Canad. J. Genet. Cytol.28, 409–415.Google Scholar
  12. —, 1985: Geographical variation of genome size at low taxonomic levels in theScilla bifolia alliance (Hyacinthaceae). — Flora176, 431–438.Google Scholar
  13. Kiatgrajai, P., Wellons, J. D., Gollob, L., White, J. D., 1982: Kinetics of polymerization of (+)-catechin with formaldehyde. — J. Org. Chem.47, 2913–2917.Google Scholar
  14. Krug, H., 1980: Histo- und Zytophotometrie. — Jena: VEB Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
  15. Miksche, J. P., Dhillon, S. S., Berlyn, G. P., Landauer, K. J., 1979: Nonspecific light loss and intrinsic DNA variation problems associated with Feulgen DNA cytophotometry. — J. Histochem. Cytochem.27, 1377–1379.Google Scholar
  16. Ohri, D., Khoshoo, T. N., 1986: Genome size in gymnosperms. — Pl. Syst. Evol.153, 119–132.Google Scholar
  17. Patel, K. R., Berlyn, G. P., 1982: Genetic instability of multiple buds ofPinus coulteri regenerated from tissue culture. — Canad. J. Forest Res.12, 93–101.Google Scholar
  18. Sachs, L., 1978: Angewandte Statistik: statistische Methoden und ihre Anwendung. 5. ed. — Berlin, New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johann Greilhuber
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Botany of the University of ViennaWienAustria

Personalised recommendations