Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 168, Issue 3–4, pp 123–141 | Cite as

Cladistic analyses of some net-veinedLiliiflorae

  • John G. Conran


Comparisons between previous intuitive or phenetic classifications of the netveinedLiliiflorae was used to determine a suitable group of taxa for cladistic analyses. The resultant 48 genera and generic groupings comprising 19 families from within theAsparagales, Liliales andDioscoreales were then analysed. The cladistics largely supported previous treatments, with theLiliales, Dioscoreales andAsparagales all monophyletic.

Key words

Angiosperms Liliiflorae Liliales Dioscoreales Asparagales Cladistics relationships taxonomy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baker, J. G., 1875: Revision of the genera and species ofAsparagaceae. — J. Linn. Soc.14: 508–632.Google Scholar
  2. —, 1879: A synopsis of theColchicaceae and the aberrant tribes of theLiliaceae. — J. Linn. Soc.17: 405–510.Google Scholar
  3. —, 1880: A synopsis ofAloinae andYuccoideae. — J. Linn. Soc.18: 148–241.Google Scholar
  4. Bentham, G., 1878: Flora Australiensis. 7. — London: L. Reeve.Google Scholar
  5. —, 1882: Genera plantarum. — London: L. Reeve.Google Scholar
  6. Björmstad, I., 1970: Comparative embryology ofAsparagoideae — Polygonateae, Liliaceae. — Nytt. Mag. Bot.17: 169–207.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, R., 1810: Prodromous florae novae Hollandiae et Insulae Van Diemen. 1. — London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
  8. Burbidge, N. T., 1963: Dictionary of Australian plant genera: gymnosperms and angiosperms. — Sydney: Angus & Robertson.Google Scholar
  9. Burkhill, I. H., 1960: The organography of theDioscoreaceae, the family of yams. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.56: 319–412.Google Scholar
  10. Camin, J. H., Sokal, R. R., 1965: A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. — Evolution19: 311–326.Google Scholar
  11. Conover, M. H., 1983: The vegetative morphology of the reticulate-veinedLiliiflorae. — Telopea2: 401–412.Google Scholar
  12. Conran, 1985: The taxonomic affinities of the genusDrymophila (Liliaceae s. l.). — Ph.D. Thesis. University of Queensland, St. Lucia (unpublished).Google Scholar
  13. —, 1987: A phenetic study of the relationships ofDrymophila R. Br. within the reticulateveinedLiliiflorae. — Austral. J. Bot.35: 283–300.Google Scholar
  14. —, 1986: The taxonomic affinities of the genusRipogonum J. R. & G. Forst. — Nordic J. Bot.5: 215–219.Google Scholar
  15. Cronquist, A., 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dahlgren, R. M. T., 1975: A system of classification of the angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. — Bot. Not.128: 119–147.Google Scholar
  17. —, 1977. A commentary on a diagrammatic presentation of the angiosperms in relation to the distribution of character states. — Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl.1: 253–283.Google Scholar
  18. —, 1980: A revised classification of the angiosperms. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.80: 91–124.Google Scholar
  19. —, 1983: General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. — Nordic J. Bot.3: 119–150.Google Scholar
  20. —, 1985: Major clades in the angiosperms. — Cladistics1: 349–368.Google Scholar
  21. —, 1982: The monocotyledons—a comparative study. — London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. —, 1983: Monocotyledon evolution characters and phylogenetic estimation. — InHeckt, M. K., Wallace, B., Prance, G. T., (Eds.): Evolutionary biology16, pp. 255–395. — New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  23. —, 1985: The families of the monocotyledons. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Delpino, F., 1903: Aggiunte alla teoria della classificazione delle monocotiledoni. — Mem. Acad. Bologna Ser. 5,10: 569–584.Google Scholar
  25. Du Mortier, B. C., 1829: Analyse des familles des plantes. — Ainé: Tournay.Google Scholar
  26. Duncan, T., 1984:Willi Hennig, character compatibility, Wagner parsimony and the “Dendrogrammaceae” revisited. — Taxon33: 698–704.Google Scholar
  27. Emberger, L., 1960: Les végétaux vasculaires. — InChaudefaud, M., Emberger, L., (Eds.): Traité de botanique systematique 2, pp. 1–1539. — Paris: Masson & Cie.Google Scholar
  28. Farris, J. S., 1970: Methods for computing Wagner trees. — Syst. Zool.19: 83–92.Google Scholar
  29. —, 1985: Parsimony, synapomorphy and explanatory power: a reply toDuncan. — Taxon34: 130–135.Google Scholar
  30. Felsenstein, J., 1985: Phylogenies and the comparative method. — Amer. Naturalist125: 1–15.Google Scholar
  31. Hooker, J. D., 1859: The botany of the Antarctic voyage of H. M. discovery ships Erebus and Terror in the years 1839–1843 under the command of Captain Sir James Clarke Ross. 1. Flora Antarctica. — London: L. Reeve.Google Scholar
  32. Huber, H., 1969: Die Samenmerkmale und Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse derLiliiflorae. — Mitt. bot. Staatssamml. Münch.8: 219–538.Google Scholar
  33. —, 1977: The treatment of the monocotyledons in an evolutionary system of classification. — Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl.1: 285–298.Google Scholar
  34. Hutchinson, J., 1934. The families of flowering plants. 2. Monocotyledons. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Inamdar, J. A., Shenoy, K. N., Rao, N. W., 1983: Leaf architecture of some monocotyledons with reticulate venation. — Ann. Bot.52: 725–736.Google Scholar
  36. Khokhryakov, A. P., 1975: Somatic evolution of the monocotyledons. — Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
  37. Kluge, A. G., Farris, J. S., 1969: Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. — Syst. Zool.18: 1–32.Google Scholar
  38. Knuth, R., 1930:Dioscoreaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien15 a, pp. 438–482. — Leipzig: Engelman.Google Scholar
  39. Krause, K., 1930:Liliaceae — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien.15 a, pp. 227–386. — Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
  40. Kunth, C. S., 1842: Über die natürliche Gruppe der Liliaceen im weitesten Sinne des Worts. — Abh. Akad. Wiss. Berlin35: 1–55.Google Scholar
  41. Lance, G. N., Williams, W. T., 1967: Mixed data classificatory programs 1. Agglomerative systems. — Austral. Comput. J.9: 373–380.Google Scholar
  42. Lotsy, J. P., 1911: Vorträge über botanische StammesgeschichteCormophyta Siphonogamia. 3. — Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
  43. Melchior, H., 1954:Liliiflorae. — InEngler, A., (Ed.): Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien 2, pp. 513–543. — Berlin: Borntrager.Google Scholar
  44. Nakai, T., 1936: Subdivision ofConvallariaceae. — Japan. J. Bot.12: 145–150.Google Scholar
  45. Nordal, I., 1987: Cladistics and character weighting: a contribution to the compatability versus parsimony discussion. — Taxon36: 59–60.Google Scholar
  46. Pax, F., 1930:Taccaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien15 a, pp. 434–437. — Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
  47. —, 1930:Amaryllidaceae — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien.15 a, pp. 391–430. — Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
  48. Salisbury, R. A., 1866: Genera plantarum. — London: John van Voort.Google Scholar
  49. Schlittler, J., 1949: Die systematische Stellung der GattungPetermannia F. v. Muell. und ihre phylogenetischen Beziehungen zu denLuzuriagoideae Engl. und denDioscoreaceae Lindl. — Vierteljahresschr. naturf. Ges. Zürich94: 1–28.Google Scholar
  50. Schulze, W., 1982a: Beiträge zur Taxonomie der Liliifloren 7.Philesiaceae. — Wiss. Z. Friedrich Schiller Univ. Jena31: 277–283.Google Scholar
  51. —, 1982b: Beiträge zur Taxonomie der Liliifloren 8.Smilacaceae. — Wiss. Z. Friedrich Schiller Univ. Jena31: 285–289.Google Scholar
  52. —, 1982c: Beiträge zur Taxonomie der Liliifloren 10.Asparagaceae. — Wiss. Z. Friedrich Schiller Univ. Jena31: 309–330.Google Scholar
  53. Takhtajan, A. L., 1980: Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). — Bot. Rev.46: 226–359.Google Scholar
  54. Thorne, R. F., 1983: Proposed new alignments in the angiosperms. — Nordic J. Bot.3: 85–117.Google Scholar
  55. Waterhouse, J. T., 1987 [1986]: The phylogenetic significance ofDracaena-type growth. — Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W.109: 131–138.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • John G. Conran
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany DepartmentMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations