Parasitology Research

, Volume 81, Issue 8, pp 696–699 | Cite as

Effects of sequence alignment on the phylogeny ofSarcocystis deduced from 18S rDNA sequences

  • John Ellis
  • David Morrison
Short Communication


The family Sarcocystidae contains a wide variety of parasitic protozoa, some of which are important pathogens of livestock and humans. The taxonomic relationships between two of the genera in this family (Toxoplasma andSarcocystis) have been debated for a number of years and remain controversial. Recent studies, from comparisons of 18S rDNA-sequence data, have suggested thatSarcocystis is paraphyletic, although a hypothesis supporting monophyly ofSarcocystis could not be rejected. The present study shows that the phylogenetically informative nucleotide positions within the 18S rDNA are primarily located in the regions that make up the helices in the secondary structure of the 18S rRNA. A phylogenetic analysis of 18S rDNA-sequence data aligned by secondary structure constraints, or a subset of the data corresponding to all nucleotides found in the helices, provide unambiguous evidence supporting monophyly ofSarcocystis.


Nucleotide Phylogenetic Analysis Secondary Structure Sequence Alignment rDNA Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barta JR (1989) Phylogenetic analysis of the class Sporozoea (phylum Apicomplexa Levine 1970): evidence for the independent evolution of heteroxenous life cycles. J Parasitol 75:195–206Google Scholar
  2. Chan SC, Wong AKC, Chiu DKY (1992) A survey of multiple sequence comparison methods. Bull Math Biol 54:563–598Google Scholar
  3. De Rijk P, De Wachter R (1993) DCSE, an interactive tool for sequence alignment and secondary structure research. CABIOS 9:735–740Google Scholar
  4. Dixon MT, Hillis DM (1993) Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 10:256–267Google Scholar
  5. Doolittle RF (ed) (1990) Molecular evolution: computer analysis of protein and nucleic acid sequences. Methods Enzymol 183:303–502Google Scholar
  6. Ellis J, Morrison DA, Johnson AM (1994a) The molecular phylogeny of sporozoan parasites. Today's Life Sci 6:30–34Google Scholar
  7. Ellis J, Luton K, Bayerstock PR, Brindley PJ, Nimmo KA, Johnson AM (1994b) The phylogeny ofNeospora caninum Mol Biochem Parasitol 64:303–311Google Scholar
  8. Ellis J, Luton K, Baverstock PR, Whitworth G, Tenter AM, Johnson AM (1995) Phylogenetic relationships betweenToxoplasma andSarcocystis deduced from a comparison of 18S rDNA sequences. Parasitology (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Gatesby J, Desalle R, Wheeler W (1993) Alignment-ambiguous nucleotide sites and the exclusion of systematic data. Mol Phyl Evol 2:152–157Google Scholar
  10. Hendy MD, Penny D (1982) Branch and bound algorithms to determine minimal evolutionary trees. Math Biosci 59:277–290Google Scholar
  11. Hillis DM, Dixon MT (1991) Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q Rev Biol 66:411–453Google Scholar
  12. Holmdahl JM, Mattson JG, Uggla A, Johansson K-E (1994) The phylogeny ofNeospora caninum andToxoplasma gondii based on ribosomal RNA sequences. FEMS Micro Lett 119:187–192Google Scholar
  13. Johnson AM, Illana S, Hakendorf P, Baverstock PR (1988) Phylogenetic relationships of the apicomplexan protistSarcocystis as determined by small subunit ribosomal RNA sequence comparison. J Parasitol 74:847–860Google Scholar
  14. Neefs J-M, Van de Peer Y, De Rijk P, Chapeele S, De Wachter R, (1993) Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res 21:3025–3049Google Scholar
  15. Smith AB (1989) RNA sequence data in phylogenetic reconstruction: testing the limits of its resolution. Cladistics 5:321–344Google Scholar
  16. Swofford DL (1990) PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, version 3.1.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  17. Tenter AM, Baverstock PR, Johnson AM (1992) Phylogenetic relationships ofSarcocystis species from sheep goats, cattle and mice based on ribosomal RNA sequences. Int J Parasitol 22:503–513Google Scholar
  18. Van de Peer Y, Van den Broeck I, De Rijk P, De Wachter R (1994) Database on the structure of small ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 22:3488–3494Google Scholar
  19. Waterman MS (1989) Mathematical methods for DNA sequences. CRC, Boca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  20. Wheeler WC, Honeycutt RL (1988) Paired sequence difference in ribosomal RNAs: evolution and phylogenetic implications. Mol Biol Evol 5:90–96Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Ellis
    • 1
  • David Morrison
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Cell and Molecular BiologyUniversity of Technology SydneyGore HillAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Biology and HorticultureUniversity of Technology SydneyGore HillAustralia

Personalised recommendations