Parasitology Research

, Volume 78, Issue 2, pp 120–122 | Cite as

Efficacy of topically applied invermectin against sarcoptic mange (Sarcoptes scabiei var.bovis) of cattle

  • M. D. Soll
  • J. A. d'Assonville
  • C. J. Z. Smith
Original Investigations


A total of 12 adult cattle with sarcoptic mange were included in a study to confirm the efficacy of ivermectin applied topically at 500 μg/kg againstSarcoptes scabiei var.bovis. Animals were allocated by restrictive randomization according to mite counts to serve as untreated controls or were treated with a topical formulation of ivermectin applied along the backline on healthy skin. Mites were counted in epidermal scrapings made prior to treatment and at 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56 days thereafter. Except for three mites recovered from one animal on day 28, no mites were found after day 14 over the remainder of the trial in scrapings from animals treated with invermectin. Differences in the numbers of mites recovered from animals treated with ivermectin and those found on controls were significant (P<0.05) for counts carried out on days 14–56. Clinical signs of mange resolved following treatment, whereas the extent of lesions and severity of clinical signs increased in the control animals over the trial period.


Clinical Sign Control Animal Untreated Control Ivermectin Trial Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alva-Valdes R, Wallace DH, Holste JE, Egerton JR, Cox JL, Wooden JW, Barrick RA (1986) Efficacy of ivermectin in a topical formulation against induced gastrointestinal and pulmonary nematode infections, and naturally acquired grubs and lice in cattle. Am J Vet Res 47:2389–2392Google Scholar
  2. Barth D, Preston J (1988) Efficacy of topically administered ivermectin against chorioptic and sarcoptic mange of cattle. Vet Rec 123:101–104Google Scholar
  3. Barth D, Sutherland IH (1980) Investigations of the efficacy of ivermectin against ectoparasites in cattle. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [A] 267:319Google Scholar
  4. Barth D, Batty AF, Robin B, Preston JM (1986) Efficacy of a topical formulation of ivermectin against cattle ectoparasites. Proceedings, 14th Congress on Diseases of Cattle, Dublin, Ireland, Aug 26–29, 1986, pp 157–159Google Scholar
  5. Cramer LG, Carvalho LAF, Bridi AA, Amaral NK, Barrick RA (1988) Efficacy of topically applied ivermectin againstBoophilus microplus in cattle. Vet Parasitol 29:341–349Google Scholar
  6. Gregory DJ (1982) The epidemiology of a recent outbreak of cattle mange in British Columbia. Agric Gaz Can 34:13–17Google Scholar
  7. Hagemeister P, Schulz W (1983) Efficacy of ivermectin against mange in cattle. Prakt Tierarzt 64:807–810Google Scholar
  8. Lavigne C, Smith CJ (1983) Treatment of sarcoptic mange in Canadian cattle with ivermectin. Can Vet J 24:389–391Google Scholar
  9. Lucks W, Dubeler A (1983) Efficacy of a single treatment for mange in cattle with an injectable preparation of ivermectin. Prakt Tierarzt 64:1035–1036Google Scholar
  10. Meleney WP (1982) Control of psoroptic scabies on calves with ivermectin. Am J Vet Res 43:329–331Google Scholar
  11. Palmer CR, Amelsfoort A van (1983) Cattle mange: importance in South Africa and chemical control with the organophosphate phoxim. J S Afr Vet Assoc 54:99–103Google Scholar
  12. Soll MD, Carmichael IH, Swan GE, Scherer H (1987) Control of cattle mange in Southern Africa using ivermectin. Trop Anim Health Prod 19:93–102Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. D. Soll
    • 1
  • J. A. d'Assonville
    • 1
  • C. J. Z. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Merck Sharp & Dohme Research LaboratoriesRahwayUSA

Personalised recommendations