Advertisement

Origins of life

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 3–6 | Cite as

The origin of the planetesimal theory

  • Stephen G. Brush
Article

Abstract

T. C. Chamberlin suggested in 1897, on the basis of geological and climatological arguments, that the planets were formed by accretion of cold solid particles. With F. R. Moulton he developed convincing arguments against the Laplace nebular hypothesis and published a comprehensive ‘planetesimal theory’ of the origin of the solar system in 1905. The Chamberlin-Moulton theory has current as well as historical interest.

Keywords

Organic Chemistry Geochemistry Solar System Solid Particle Convincing Argument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brush, S. G.: 1976, ‘The Overthrow of the Nebular Hypothesis,’ Technical Note BN-836 (to be published).Google Scholar
  2. Brush, S. G.: 1977,The Temperature of History, Franklin, New York, Chapter 3.Google Scholar
  3. Chamberlin, T. C.: 1897,J. Geol. 5, 653.Google Scholar
  4. Chamberlin, T. C.: 1900,J. Geol. 8, 58.Google Scholar
  5. Chamberlin, T. C.: 1905,Carnegie Inst. Year Book No. 3 for 1904, p. 195.Google Scholar
  6. Giuli, R. T.: 1968,Icarus,8, 301.Google Scholar
  7. Moulton, F. R.: 1900,Astrophys. J 11, 103.Google Scholar
  8. Moulton, F. R.: 1905,Astrophys. J. 22, 165.Google Scholar
  9. Schultz, S.: 1976,Thomas C. Chamberlin, An Intellectual Biography of a Geologist and Educator, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen G. Brush
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Physical Science and Technology, and Department of HistoryUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations