Parasitology Research

, Volume 77, Issue 4, pp 341–345

In vitro drug sensitivity ofTrypanosoma congolense isolates

  • Reto Brun
  • Susan Rab
Original Investigations

Abstract

The sensitivity ofTrypanosoma congolense isolates to diminazene and isometamidium was determined using an incorporation assay based on the uptake of [3H]-hypoxanthine in the presence of serial drug dilutions. The bloodstream forms of the different isolates exhibited variation in their sensitivity to the drugs that correlated well with the in vivo drug response. For diminazene, the sensitivity of the most sensitive population was 40 times that of the least sensitive population. For isometamidium, the IC50 values (the drug concentrations that decreased radiolabel incorporation by 50%) lay in a similar range, except for those found for two isolates from lions, which were 103–104 times more sensitive than the isolates from cattle. The sensitivity of procyclic forms differed markedly from that of the bloodstream stages. Therefore, it must be concluded that the procyclic stage does not reflect the sensitivity of the bloodstream forms ofT. congolense and that the former should not be used for determinations of in vitro drug sensitivity.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Authié E, Somda B, Dossama M, Toutou P (1984) Mise en évidence d'une résistance aux trypanocides parmi des souches deTrypanosoma congolense récemment isoléés au Burkina. Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop [Suppl] 37:219–235Google Scholar
  2. Baltz T, Baltz D, Giroud C, Crockett J (1985) Cultivation in a semi-defined medium of animal infective forms ofTrypanosoma brucei, T. equiperdum, T. evansi, T. rhodesiense andT. gambiense. EMBO J 4:1273–1277Google Scholar
  3. Brun R, Kunz C (1989) In vitro drug sensitivity test forTrypanosoma brucei subgroup bloodstream trypomastigotes. Acta Trop (Basel) 46:361–368Google Scholar
  4. Brun R, Baeriswyl S, Kunz C (1989) In vitro drug sensitivity ofTrypanosoma gambiense isolates. Acta Trop (Basel) 46:369–376Google Scholar
  5. Cunningham I (1977) New culture medium for maintenance of tsetse tissue and growth of trypanosomatids. J Protozool 24:325–329Google Scholar
  6. Duszenko M, Ferguson MAJ, Lamont GS, Rifkin MR, Cross GAM (1985) Cysteine eliminates the feeder cell requirement for cultivation ofTrypanosoma brucei bloodstream forms in vitro. J Exp Med 162:1256–1263Google Scholar
  7. Elrayah IE, Kaminsky R (1991) The effect of trypanocides on cultured procyclic forms of susceptible and drug-resistantTrypanosoma congolense. Acta Trop (Basel) (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Geigy R, Kauffmann M (1973) Sleeping sickness survey in the Serengeti area (Tansania) 1971: I. Examination of large mammals for trypanosomes. Acta Trop (Basel) 30:12–23Google Scholar
  9. Grab DJ, Bwayo JJ (1982) Isopycnic isolation of African trypanosomes on percoll gradients formed in situ. Acta Trop (Basel) 39:363–366Google Scholar
  10. Hirumi H, Hirumi K (1989) Continuous cultivation ofTrypanosoma brucei bloodstream forms in a medium containing a low concentration of serum protein without feeder cell layers. J Parasitol 75:985–989Google Scholar
  11. Joshua RA (1988) Drug resistance in recent isolates ofTrypanosoma brucei andTrypanosoma congolense. Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop 41:359–364Google Scholar
  12. Lanham SM, Godfrey DG (1970) Isolation of salivarian trypanosomes from man and other mammals using DEAE-cellulose. Exp Parasitol 28:521–534Google Scholar
  13. Losos GJ, Ikede BO (1972) Review of pathology of diseases in domestic and laboratory animals caused byT. congolense, T. virax, T. brucei, T. rhodesiense andT. gambiense. Vet Pathol 9:1–71Google Scholar
  14. Mbwambo HA, Mella PNP, Lekaki KA (1988) Berenil (diminazene aceturate)-resistantTrypanosoma congolense in cattle under natural tsetse challenge at Kibaha, Tanzania. Acta Trop (Basel) 45:239–244Google Scholar
  15. McNamara J (1988) In vitro testing of sensitivity ofT. congolense to isometamidium chloride. Annual report. Overseas Development Administration and Tsetse Research Laboratory, University of Bristol, pp 46–47Google Scholar
  16. Pinder M, Authié E (1984) The appearance of isometamidium-resistantTrypanosoma congolense in West Africa. Acta Trop (Basel) 41:247–252Google Scholar
  17. Ross CA, Taylor AM (1990)Trypanosoma congolense: an in vitro assay to distinguish drug-resistant from drug-sensitive populations. Parasitol Res 76:326–331Google Scholar
  18. Schillinger D (1985) Trypanocidal drug resistance. Kenya Vet 9:21–24Google Scholar
  19. Thevenaz P (1981)Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense au cours de son cycle biologique: examen en microscopie electronique et optique. Thesis, University of BaselGoogle Scholar
  20. Wellde B, Lötzsch R, Deindl G, Sadun E, Williams J, Warui G (1974)Trypanosoma congolense: I. Clinical observations of experimentally infected cattle. Exp Parasitol 36:6–19Google Scholar
  21. Yabu Y, Takayanagi T, Sato S (1989) Long-term culture and cloning system forTrypanosoma brucei gambiense bloodstream forms in semidefined medium in vitro. Parasitol Res 76:93–97Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reto Brun
    • 1
  • Susan Rab
    • 1
  1. 1.Swiss Tropical InstituteBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations