Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde

, Volume 72, Issue 3, pp 353–363 | Cite as

Comparison of two egyptian strains ofSchistosoma mansoni in hamsters

  • Gamil N. Soliman
  • Faiza M. El Assal
  • Noshy S. Mansour
  • Kohar Garo
Original Investigations


In human infection withSchistosoma mansoni from Beni-Suef, the eggs were encountered more frequently in the urine of patients than in infection withS. mansoni from Giza, where eggs were passed into the stool. A comparative study of the two strains ofS. mansoni from Beni-Suef and Giza has been carried out in golden hamster. Consistent strain differences were observed. The Beni-Suef strain proved to have lower worm recovery and different egg distribution patterns in tissues of infected hamsters. Worms of both sexes of this strain were larger in size and required a longer period to reach maturity. Hence, the prepatent period was prolonged. Significant differences between the two strains were also noted in the number of eggs per worm. A lower mortality rate and a longer survival time were encountered in hamsters infected with the Beni-Suef strain.


Survival Time Lower Mortality Human Infection Longe Survival Strain Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdel Wahab MF (1982) Schistosomiasis in Egypt. CRC Press Inc Boca Raton Florida, pp 21–165Google Scholar
  2. Ali OF, Eissa M (1984) Observations on morbidity from schistosomiasis through a control program in Middle Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 14 (2):441Google Scholar
  3. Belding DL (1965) The blood flukes of man. Textbook of parasitology. 3rd ed. Appletion-Century Crofts New York, pp 739–795Google Scholar
  4. Coles GC, Thurston JP (1970) Testes number in East AfricanSchistosoma mansoni. J Helminthol 44(1):69–73Google Scholar
  5. El Assal FM (1981) Comparative biological and biochemical studies on the Egyptian human blood flukes,Schistosoma mansoni andS. haematobium and a rodent strain ofS. mansoni. Ph D Thesis Fac Sci Cairo UnivGoogle Scholar
  6. Halawani AA, Farag HF, Awadalla HN (1977) Studies on experimental mixed infection ofSchistosoma haematobium andS. mansoni in the albino mouse. Tropenmed Parasit 28:478–480Google Scholar
  7. Hsu HF, Hsu SY Li (1957) On the infra-specific and inter-strain variations of male sexual glands ofSchistosoma japonicum. J Parasitol 43:457–463Google Scholar
  8. Hsu HF, Hsu SY Li (1960) On the virulence of the geographical strains ofSchistosoma japonicum. Am J Trop Med Hyg 9:195–198Google Scholar
  9. Hussein M (1972) Unpublished mimeograph of health manpower. High Inst Publ Hlth Univ Alex EgyptGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaffe R, Mayer M, Pifano CF (1945) Quoted from Saoud MFA 1966a. The infectivity and pathogenecity of geographical strains ofSchistosoma mansoni. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 60(5):585–560Google Scholar
  11. James C, Webbe G (1973) A comparison of Egyptian and East African strains ofSchistosoma haematobium. J Helminthol 47:49–59Google Scholar
  12. Koura M (1971) The relation between egg production and worm burden in experimental schistosomiasis II Duration of infection. J Egypt Med Assoc 54:446–450Google Scholar
  13. Le Roux PL (1953) Specimens from a fatal case of schistosomiasis haematobia in white mouse. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 47:264Google Scholar
  14. Mansour NS, Soliman GN, El Assal FM (1984) Studies on experimental mixed infection ofSchistosoma mansoni andS. haematobium in hamsters. Z Parasitenkd 70:345–458Google Scholar
  15. Miller P, Wilson RA (1980) Migration of the schistosomula ofSchistosoma mansoni from the lungs to the hepatic portal system. Parasitology 80:267–288Google Scholar
  16. Pitchford RJ (1961) Observation on a possible hybrid between the two schistosomes,Schistosoma haematobium andS. matthei. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 55(1):44–51Google Scholar
  17. Porter A (1938) The larval trematoda found in certain South African Mollusca with special reference to schistosomiasis bilharziasis. Publ Afr Inst Med Res 8:1–492Google Scholar
  18. Romanes GJ (1977) Cunningham's manual of practical anatomy. Vol 2: Thorax and abdomen. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 126Google Scholar
  19. Saoud MFA (1966a) The infectivity and pathogenecity of geographical strains ofSchistosoma mansoni. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 60(5):585–600Google Scholar
  20. Saoud MFA (1966b) On the infraspecific variation of the male sexual glands ofSchistosoma mansoni. J Helminthol XL (314):385–394Google Scholar
  21. Scott JA (1937) The incidence and distribution of the human schistosomes in Egypt. Am J Trop Med Hyg 25:566–614Google Scholar
  22. Sher FA, Machenzie P, Smithers SR (1974) Decreased recovery of invading parasites from the lungs as a parameter of acquired immunity to schistosomiasis in laboratory mouse. J Infect Dis 130:626–633Google Scholar
  23. Webbe G, James C (1971) A comparison of two geographical strains ofSchistosoma haematobium. J Helminthol 45(2/3):271–284Google Scholar
  24. WHO Bull (1974) Immunology of schistosomiasis (Memoranda) 51:553Google Scholar
  25. Wright WH (1973) Geographical distribution of schistosomiasis and their intermediate host. In: Ansari N (ed) Epidemiology and control of schistosomiasis (Bilharziasis). B1-9 Baltimore Univ Park Press, Baltimore, p 42Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gamil N. Soliman
    • 1
  • Faiza M. El Assal
    • 1
  • Noshy S. Mansour
    • 2
  • Kohar Garo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology, Faculty of ScienceCairo UniversityEgypt
  2. 2.Department of ParasitologyNAMRU-3CairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations