Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde

, Volume 71, Issue 4, pp 505–518 | Cite as

Transmission experiments on the host specificity ofHeterophyes species in 16 potential definitive hosts

  • H. Taraschewski
Original Investigations

Abstract

Sixteen different species of piscivorous mammals and birds were tried as experimental definitive hosts forHeterophyes heterophyes, H. aequalis andH. dispar. The hosts were classified in four categories, by fluke longevity, recovery and size, and the number of uterine eggs (embryonated/unembryonated): (1) Canidae and the cat were highly susceptible hosts for all three species ofHeterophyes; (2) several mammals and herons showed a reduced susceptibility to infection (H. aequalis, 6 species;H. dispar, 1 species;H. heterophyes, 0 species); (3) In a group of hosts specific to each trematode, flukes were recovered up to 14 days post infection, but their uterine eggs did not become embryonated; (4) In a fourth category of hosts, chiefly Mustelidae, flukes could not be recovered. Taking also the literature into account it is concluded that man is a highly susceptible host forH. heterophyes, and that probablyH. aequalis andH. dispar may reach reproductive maturity in humans also. The described wide host range ofH. aequalis appears to be more typical for Heterophyidae than the comparably narrow host range ofH. heterophyes.

Keywords

Host Range Host Specificity Post Infection Definitive Host Susceptible Host 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Africa CM (1938) Description of three trematodes of the genusHaplorchis (Heterophyidae): with notes on two other Philippine members of the genus. Phil J Sci 66:299–307Google Scholar
  2. Babbot jr FL, Frye WW, Gordon JE (1961) Intestinal parasites of man in arctic Greenland. Am J Trop Med Hyg 10 (2):185–190Google Scholar
  3. Chai JY, Cho SJ, Seo BS (1977) Study onMetagonimus yokogawai (Katsurada, 1912) in Korea 4. An epidemiological investigation along Tamjin River Basin, South Cholla Do, Korea. Kor J Parasitol 15:115–120Google Scholar
  4. Coble YD, Schulert AS, Davis JT, Awad AY (1968) Blood, urine and parasitological examinations in male Egyptian oasis subjects. Trop Geogr Med 20:119–126Google Scholar
  5. Ellis C, Williams JC (1973) The longevity of some species of helminth parasites in naturally acquired infections of the lesser black-backed gullLarus fuscus L. in Britain. J Helminthol 47:329–338Google Scholar
  6. Ito J (1964)Metagonimus and other human heterophyid trematodes. Progr Med Parasitol Jap 1:315–398Google Scholar
  7. Kagei N, Oshima T, Ishikawa K, Kihata M (1964) Two cases of human infection withStellantchasmus falcatus Onji et Nishio, 1915 (Heterophyidae) in Kochi Prefecture (Japanese, English summary). Jap J Parasitol 13:472–478Google Scholar
  8. Khalil M (1937) The life-history of the human trematode parasiteHeterophyes heterophyes. Compt Rend 12 Congr Int Zool 3 (Lisbon 1935)Google Scholar
  9. Komiya Y, Suzuki N (1966) The metacercariae of trematodes belonging to the family Heterophyidae from Japan and adjacent countries (Japanese, English summary). Jap J Parasitol 15:208–214Google Scholar
  10. Komiya Y, Ito J, Yamamoto S (1958) An epidemiological survey ofMetagonimus yokogawai in Kasumigaura district (Japanese, English summary). Jap J Parasitol 7:7–11Google Scholar
  11. Kuntz RE, Chandler AC (1956) Studies on Egyptian trematodes with special reference to the heterophyids of mammals. I. Adult flukes with describtions ofPhagicola longicollis n.sp.,Cynodiplostomum namrui n.sp., and aStephanospora from cats. J Parasitol 42:445–459Google Scholar
  12. Looss A (1902) Notizen zur Helminthologie Egyptens V. Eine Revision der FasciolidengattungHeterophyes Cobb. Zentbl Bakteriol 32:886–891Google Scholar
  13. Manning GS, Lertprasert P (1970) Four new trematodes of man from Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyp 65:101–102Google Scholar
  14. Manning GS, Lertprasert P, Watanasirmkit K, Chetty C (1971) A description of newly discovered intestinal parasites endemic to northeast Thailand. J Med Assoc Thail 54:466–475Google Scholar
  15. Mansour NS, Youssef M, Awadalla HN, Hammouda NH, Boulos LM (1981) Susceptibility of small laboratory animals toPygidiopsis genata (Trematoda: Heterophyidae) J Egypt Soc Parasitol 11:225–234Google Scholar
  16. Nagathy HF, Khalil HM (1964) Incidence of helminth infections among the out-patients in the clinic of Matarria collective unit, Dakahlia Governorate, U.A.R. J Egypt Med Ass 47:341–346Google Scholar
  17. Niemi DR, Macy RW (1974) The life cycle and infectivity to man ofApophallus donicus (Skrjabim and Lindtrop, 1919) (Trematoda: Heterophyidae) in Oregon. Proc Helminthol Soc Wash 41:223–229Google Scholar
  18. Odening K (1970) Der Entwicklungszyklus vonApophallus muehlingi (Trematoda: Opisthorchiida: Heterophyidae) in Berlin. Z Parasitenkd 33:194–210Google Scholar
  19. Pande BP, Shukla RP (1972) Metacercarial cyst ofHaplorchis pumilio, its development in experimental mammals and other heterophyid infections of freshwater fishes and their zoonotic significance. Indian J. Anim Sci 42:972–978Google Scholar
  20. Paperna I, Overstreet RM (1981) Parasites and diseases of mullets (Mugilidae). In: Oren OH (ed) Aquaculture of grey mullets. Cambridge University Press, 411–493Google Scholar
  21. Pemberton RT (1963) Helminth parasites of three species of British gulls.Larus argentatus Pont.,L. fuscus L. andL. ridibundus L. J Helminthol 37:57–88Google Scholar
  22. Rifaat MA, Salem SA, El Kholy SJ, Hegazi MM, Youssef M (1980) Studies on the incidence ofHeterophyes heterophyes in Dakahlia Governorate. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 10:369–373Google Scholar
  23. Saito S (1973) On the differences betweenMetagonimus yokogawai andMetagonimus takahashii: II. The experimental infections of the second intermediate hosts (Japanese, English summary). Jap J Parasitol 22:39–44Google Scholar
  24. Sakai Y (1962) OnMetagonimus yokogawai Katsurada, 1912 andMetagonimus yokogawai takahashii Suzuki, 1930, especially on their first intermediate hosts and human infection in Chugoko district (Japanese, English summary). Jap J Parasitol 11:421–426Google Scholar
  25. Seo BS, Hong ST, Chai JY (1981) Studies on intestinal trematodes in Korea III. Natural human infections ofPygidiopsis summa andHeterophyes heterophyes nocens. Seoul J Med 22:228–235Google Scholar
  26. Seo BS, Lee SH, Chai JY, Hong SJ (1984) Studies on intestinal trematodes in Korea. 13. Two cases of natural human infection byHeterophyopsis continua and the status of metacercarial infection in brackish water fishes. Kor J Parasitol 22:51–60Google Scholar
  27. Sheir ZM, El-Shabrawy Aboul-Enein M (1970) Demographic, clinical and therapeutic appraisal of heterophyiasis. J Trop Med Hyg 76:148–152Google Scholar
  28. Siebold CTE (1852) Ein Beitrag zur Helmintholographia humana, aus brieflichen Mitteilungen des Dr. Bilharz in Cairo, nebst Bemerkungen. Z Wiss Zool 4:53–76Google Scholar
  29. Tantachamrun T, Kliks M (1978) Heterophyid infection in human ileum: report of three cases. Southeast Asean J Trop Med Public Health 9:229–231Google Scholar
  30. Taraschewski H (1984a) Die Trematoden der Gattung Heterophyes, Taxonomie, Biologie, Epidemiologie. Dissertation, University of Hohenheim, pp 169Google Scholar
  31. Taraschewski H (1984b) Heterophyiasis, an intestinal fluke infection of man and vertebrates transmitted by euryhaline gastropods and fish. Helgoländer Meeresunters 37:463–478Google Scholar
  32. Taraschewski H (1985) Investigations on prevalence ofHeterophyes species in 12 populations of the first intermediate host in Egypt and Sudan. Submitted to: J Trop Med HygGoogle Scholar
  33. Taraschewski H, Paperna I (1981) Distribution of the snailPirenella conica in Sinai and Israel and its infection by Heterophyidae and other trematodes. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 5:193–205Google Scholar
  34. Wells WH, Blagg W (1956) A survey of human intestinal parasites in a fishing village of northern Egypt. Am J Trop Med Hyg 5:266–268Google Scholar
  35. Wells WH, Randall BH (1956) New hosts for trematodes of the genusHeterophyes in Egypt. J Parasitol 42:287–292Google Scholar
  36. Yokogawa M, Sano M (1968) Studies on the intestinal flukes IV. On the development of the worm in the experimentally infected animals with metacercariae ofMetagonimus yokogawai (Japanese, English summary). Jap J Parasitol 17:540–545Google Scholar
  37. Yokogawa M, Sano M, Itabashi T, Kachi S (1965) Studies on the intestinal flukes II. Epidemiological studies on heterophyid trematodes of man in Chiba prefecture (Japanese, English summary. Jap J Parasitol 14:577–585Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Taraschewski
    • 1
  1. 1.Inst. Spez. Zoologie und ParasitologieRuhr-UniversitätBochumFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations