Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The functional morphology of the scolex of twoTetrabothrius Rudolphi 1819 species (Cestoda; Tetrabothriidae) from penguins

Abstract

The functional morphology of the scolex of two species ofTetrabothrius from penguins from Bouvet Island in the Antarctic as revealed by scanning electron and light microscopy is described. These two species,T. pauliani from chintrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) andTetrabothrius sp. from macaroni penguins (Edyptes chrysolophus), possessed scoleces with a somewhat different appearance and the way in which they attach to the host gut also turned out to be different. InT. pauliani the auricles were well developed and played a major role in the attachment process while the bothridia functioned as lateral shallow suckers. InTetrabothrius sp. the auricles were very small and played an inferior role in the attachment process while the bothridia acted as powerful anteriorly directed cup-like suckers.

In addition the definition of and the difference between cyclophyllidean acetabula and Tetrabothriidean bothridia are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andersen K (1975a) Comparison of surface topography of three species ofDiphyllobothrium (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea) by scanning electron microscopy. Int J Parasit 3:561–571

  2. Andersen K (1975b) The functional morphology of the scolex ofDiphyllobothrium Cobbold (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea). A scanning electron and light microscopical study on scoleces of adultD. dendriticum (Nitzsch),D. latum (L.) andD. ditremum (Creplin). Int J Parasit 5:487–493

  3. Baer JG (1932) Contribution a l'étude des cestodes des cétacés. Rev Suisse Zool 39:195–228

  4. Baer JG (1954) Revision taxinomique et étude des Cestodes de la famille des Tetrabothriidae, parasites d'Oiseaux de haute mer et de Mammiferes marins. Mém. Univ. Neuchâtel Sér. in-quarto T. 1. 121 pp.

  5. Fuhrman O (1932) Les Tenias des Oiseaux. Mém. Univ. Neuchâtel 8:385 pp.

  6. Nybelin O (1922) Anatomisch-systematische Studien über Pseudophyllidian. Göteborgs Kgl. Vetenskaps-Akad. Handl. 26:1–228

  7. Rees G (1956) The Scolex ofTetrabothrius affinis (Lönnberg), a Cestode fromBalaenoptera musculus L., the Blue Whale. Parasitology 46:425–442

  8. Schmidt GD (1970) How to know the Tapeworms. W.M.C. Brown Company Publishers, Dubuque, Iowa. 266 pp

  9. Skrjabin KI (1955)Helminthofauna of Marine Mammals (Ecology and Phylogeny). Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem 1968. 522 pp

  10. Spätlich W (1909) Untersuchungen über Tetrabothrien. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Cestoden-Körpers. Zool Jahrb Anat 28:539–594

  11. Wardle RA, McLeod JA (1952) The Zoology of Tapeworms. The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

  12. Wardle RA, McLeod JA, Radinovsky S (1974) Advances in the Zoology of Tapeworms 1950–1970. The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

  13. Yamaguti S (1959) Systema Helminthum, Vol II.The Cestodes of Vertebrates. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersen, K.I., Lysfjord, S. The functional morphology of the scolex of twoTetrabothrius Rudolphi 1819 species (Cestoda; Tetrabothriidae) from penguins. Z. Parasitenkd. 67, 299–307 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00927665

Download citation

Keywords

  • Light Microscopy
  • Functional Morphology
  • Attachment Process
  • Inferior Role