Empirica

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 125–145 | Cite as

Understanding futures markets

  • Michael J. P. Magill
Article
  • 60 Downloads

Keywords

Economic Growth International Economic Private Information Industrial Organization Future Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Zusammenfassung

Die Arbeit besteht aus drei Teilen: Der erste enthält einige empirische Eigenschaften von Terminmärkten; der zweite gibt einen kurzen Überblick über die “klassischen” Theorien von Keynes, Kaldor und Working; und der dritte (Haupt-) Teil ist der modernen Theorie dieser Märkte gewidmet. Die moderne Theorie unterscheidet sich von der klassischen u. a. durch eine explizite Berücksichtigung der Informationsstruktur und Erwartungsbildung sowie durch die systematische Verwendung von Gleichgewichtsbegriffen. Gestützt auf neuere Resultate verschiedener Autoren wird gezeigt, wie die moderne Theorie zur Klärung einer Reihe von Fragen dienen kann, z. B. der Bedingungen, unter denen Terminmärkte zu einer Pareto-effizienten Allokation führen, des Zusammenhangs zwischen Terminpreisschwankungen und Informationsstruktur, des Einflusses von Terminmärkten auf Produktionsentscheidungen, des Ausmaßes, in dem die Preise auf Terminmärkten private Information aggregieren, usw.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, R. W., “The Determinants of the Volatility of Futures Prices”, Center for the Study of Futures Markets, Columbia University, Working Paper, 1982, (33).Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. W., Danthine, J.-P. (1983A), “The Time Pattern of Hedging and the Volatility of Futures Prices”, Review of Economic Studies, 1983, 50(2), pp. 249–266.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. W., Danthine, J.-P. (1983B), “Hedger Diversity in Futures Markets”, The Economic Journal, 1983, 93, pp. 370–389.Google Scholar
  4. Arrow, K. J., “Role of Securities in the Optimal Allocation of Risk-Bearing”, Review of Economic Studies, 1964, 31(2), pp. 91–96.Google Scholar
  5. Bray, M., “Futures Trading, Rational Expectations, and the Efficient Markets Hypothesis”, Econometrica, 1981, 49(3), pp. 575–596.Google Scholar
  6. Brennan, M. J., “The Supply of Storage”, American Economic Review, 1958 48(1), pp. 50–72.Google Scholar
  7. Danthine, J.-P., “Information, Futures Prices, and Stabilizing Speculation”, Journal of Economic Theory, 1978, 17(1), pp. 79–98.Google Scholar
  8. Debreu, G., Theory of Value, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
  9. Duffie, D., Huang, C., “Implementing Arrow-Debreu Equilibria by Continuous Trading of Few Long-Lived Securities”, Stanford University, Working Paper, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. Gray, R. W., “The Characteristic Bias in Some Thin Futures Markets”, Food Research Institute Studies, 1960, 1, pp. 296–312.Google Scholar
  11. Grossman, S. J., “On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information”, Journal of Finance, 1976, 31(2), pp. 573–585.Google Scholar
  12. Grossman, S. J., “The Existence of Futures Markets, Noisy Rational Expectations and Informational Externalities”, Review of Economic Studies, 1977, 44(3), pp. 431–449.Google Scholar
  13. Grossman, S. J., Stiglitz, J. E., “On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets”, American Economic Review, 1980, 70(3), pp. 393–408.Google Scholar
  14. Guesnerie, R., Jaffray, J.-Y., “Optimality of Equilibrium of Plans, Prices and Price Expectations”, in Drèze, J. H. (Ed.), Allocation under Uncertainty: Equilibrium and Optimality, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974, pp. 71–86.Google Scholar
  15. Hirshleifer, J., “The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity”, American Economic Review, 1971 61(4), pp. 561–574.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffman, G. W., “Grain Prices and the Futures Market. A 15-Year Survey, 1923–1938”, United States Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 747, Washington, DC, 1941.Google Scholar
  17. Kaldor, N., “Speculation and Economic Stability”, Review of Economic Studies, 1939, 7(1), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  18. Keynes, J. M., “Some Aspects of Commodity Markets”, Manchester Guardian Commercial, European Reconstruction Series, Section 13, 1923, March 29, pp. 784–786.Google Scholar
  19. Keynes, J. M., The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Macmillan Press Ltd., London, 1936.Google Scholar
  20. Kreps, D., “Multiperiod Securities and the Efficient Allocation of Risk: A Comment on the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model”, in McCall, J. (Ed.), The Economics of Uncertainty and Information, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982.Google Scholar
  21. Lintner, J., “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1965, 47(1), pp. 13–37.Google Scholar
  22. Magill, M. J. P., Benhabib, J., “Price Relations on Futures Markets for Storable Commodities”, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 1983, 91, pp. 567–591.Google Scholar
  23. Magill, M. J. P., Nermuth, M. (1984A), “Futures Markets: Speculation and Production”, University of Southern California, MRG Working Paper, 1984.Google Scholar
  24. Magill, M. J. P., Nermuth, M. (1984B), “On the Efficiency of Futures Markets”, University of Southern California, Working Paper, 1984.Google Scholar
  25. Malinvaud, E., “The Allocation of Individual Risks in Large Markets”, Journal of Economic Theory, 1972, 4(2), pp. 312–328.Google Scholar
  26. Markowitz, H., Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
  27. Nermuth, M., Information Structures in Economics, Springer, Wien-New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  28. Radner, R., “Existence of Equilibrium Plans, Prices, and Price Expectations in a Sequence of Markets”, Econometrica, 1972, 40(2), pp. 289–303.Google Scholar
  29. Radner, R., “Rational Expectations Equilibrium: Generic Existence and the Information Revealed by Price”, Econometrica, 1979, 47(3), pp. 655–678.Google Scholar
  30. Rockwell, C. S., “Normal Backwardation, Forecasting, and the Returns to Commodity Futures Traders”, Food Research Institute Studies, 1967, 7, Suppl., pp. 107–130.Google Scholar
  31. Ross, S. A., “The Current Status of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)”, Journal of Finance, 1978, 33(3), pp. 885–901.Google Scholar
  32. Samuelson, P. A., “Intertemporal Price Equilibrium: A Prologue to the Theory of Speculation”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 1957, 79(2), pp. 181–219.Google Scholar
  33. Samuelson, P. A., “Proof that Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly”, Industrial Management Review, 1965, 6, pp. 41–49.Google Scholar
  34. Samuelson, P. A., “Stochastic Speculative Price”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1971, 68, pp. 335–337.Google Scholar
  35. Sharpe, W., “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk”, Journal of Finance, 1964, 19(3), pp. 425–442.Google Scholar
  36. Tobin, J., “Liquidity Preference as Behavior towards Risk”, Review of Economic Studies, 1958, 25(2), pp. 65–85.Google Scholar
  37. Tomek, W. G., Gray, R. W., “Temporal Relationships Among Prices on Commodity Markets: Their Allocative and Stabilizing Roles”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1970, 52(3), pp. 372–380.Google Scholar
  38. Williams, J. B., “Speculation and the Carryover”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1936, 50(3), pp. 436–455.Google Scholar
  39. Working, H., “Price Relations Between July and September Wheat Futures at Chicago Since 1885”, Wheat Studies of the Food Research Institute, 1933, 9, pp. 187–238.Google Scholar
  40. Working, H., “Theory of Inverse Carrying Charge in Futures Markets”, Journal of Farm Economics, 1948, 30, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  41. Working, H., “Speculation on Hedging Markets”, Food Research Institute Studies, 1961, 2, pp. 185–220.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. P. Magill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations