Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 389–410 | Cite as

Assessment of a cognitive training program for hyperactive children

  • Virginia I. Douglas
  • Penny Parry
  • Peter Marton
  • Chrystelle Garson

Abstract

Modeling, self-verbalization, and self-reinforcement techniques were used to train hyperactive children in more effective and less impulsive strategies for approaching cognitive tasks, academic problems, and social situations. Eighteen hyperactive children took part in the training program. The control group, which received no training, consisted of 11 children, matched with the experimental group on age, IQ, and measures of hyperactivity and impulsivity. Several tests and measures, some of which have been shown to differentiate between hyperactive and normal children, were administered prior to training, at the end of the 3- month training period, and after a further 3- month period in which no training took place. The trained group showed significantly greater improvement on several of the measures, both at the time of posttesting and on the follow-up evaluation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayllon, T., Layman, D., & Kandel, H. A behavioral-educational alternative to drug control of hyperactive children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975,8, 137–146.Google Scholar
  2. Ayllon, T., & Roberts, M. Eliminating discipline problems by strengthening academic performance.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974,7, 71–76.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, H. J., & Leland, B.Detroit tests of learning aptitude. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. Bender,A visual motor gestalt test and its clinical use. American Psychiatric Assoc., New York, 1938.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, S. B., & Douglas, V. I. Cognitive styles and responses to the threat of frustration.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1972,4, 30–42.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, S. B., Douglas, V. I., & Morgenstern, G. Cognitive styles in hyperactive children and the effect of methylphenidate.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1971,12, 55.Google Scholar
  7. Christensen, D., & Sprague, R. Reduction of hyperactive behavior by conditioning procedures alone and combined with methylphenidate.Behavior Research and Therapy, 1973,77, 331–334.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, N. J.Physiological concomitants of attention in hyperactive children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, N. J., Douglas, V. I., & Morgenstern, G. The effect of methylphenidate on attentive behavior and autonomic activity in hyperactive children,Psychopharmacologia (Berlin), 1911,22, 282–294.Google Scholar
  10. Conners, C. A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies in children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969,726, 884–888.Google Scholar
  11. Conners, C. Psychological effects of stimulant drugs in children with minimal brain dysfunction.Pediatrics, 1972,49, 702–708.Google Scholar
  12. Conners, C., Eisenberg, L., & Barcai, A. Effect of dextroamphetamine on children.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1967,17, 478–485.Google Scholar
  13. Debus, R. Effects of brief observation of model behavior on conceptual tempo of impulsive children.Developmental Psychology, 1970,2, 22–32.Google Scholar
  14. Denney, D. R. Modification of children's information processing behavior through learning.Child Study Monographs, 1973,7, 1–22.Google Scholar
  15. Doubros, S. G., & Daniels, G. T. An experimental approach to the reduction of overactive behavior.Behavior Research and Therapy, 1966,4, 251–258.Google Scholar
  16. Douglas, V. I. Children's responses to frustration. A developmental study.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1965,19, 161–171.Google Scholar
  17. Douglas, V. I. Stop, look and listen: The problem of sustained attention and impulse control in hyperactive and normal children.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1972,4, 259–281.Google Scholar
  18. Douglas, V. I. Sustained attention and impulse control: Implication for the handicapped child. In J. A. Swets & L. L. Elliott (Eds.),Psychology and the handicapped child. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education, 1974.Google Scholar
  19. Douglas, V. I. Are drugs enough? To train or to treat the hyperactive child.International Journal of Mental Health, 1975,5, 199–212.Google Scholar
  20. Douglas, V. I. Perceptual and cognitive factors as determinants of learning disabilities: A review paper with special emphasis on attentional factors. In R. M. Knights & D. J. Bakker (Eds.),Neuropsychology of learning disorders: Theoretical approaches. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1976 (in press).Google Scholar
  21. Durell, D. D.Durrell analysis of reading difficulty. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1955.Google Scholar
  22. Egeland, B. Training impulsive children in the use of more efficient scanning techniques.Child Development, 1974,45, 165–171.Google Scholar
  23. Ferritor, S. E., Buckholdt, D., Hamblin, R. L., & Smith, L. The noneffect of contingent reinforcement for attending behavior on work accomplished.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972,5, 7–17.Google Scholar
  24. Firestone, P.The effects of reinforcement contingencies and caffeine on hyperactive children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, 1974.Google Scholar
  25. Firestone, P., & Douglas, V. I. The effects of reward and punishment on reaction times and autonomic activity in hyperactive and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1975,3, 201–216.Google Scholar
  26. Freibergs, V., & Douglas, V. I. Concept learning in hyperactive and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969,74, 388–395.Google Scholar
  27. Gallagher, C. C.Federal involvement in the use of behavior modification drugs on grammar school children. Hearing before a subcommittee of the Committee of Government operations, House of Representatives, September 29, 1970.Google Scholar
  28. Goldfried, M. R., & Merbaum, M.Behavior change through self-control. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
  29. Greenspoon, S., & Singer, S. Amphetamines in the treatment of hyperkinetic children.Harvard Educational Review, 1973,43, 515–555.Google Scholar
  30. Higa, W. R.Self-instructional versus direct training in modifying children's impulsive behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii, 1973.Google Scholar
  31. Jastak, J.Wide range achievement test. Wilmington: C. L. Story Co., 1946.Google Scholar
  32. Kagan, J. Reflection-impulsivity: The generality of conceptual tempo,Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1966,36, 609–628.Google Scholar
  33. Koppitz, E.The B ender-Gestalt test for young children. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1964.Google Scholar
  34. Krager, J., & Safer, D. Type and prevalence of medication used in treating hyperactive children.New England Journal of Medicine, 1974,291, 1118–1120.Google Scholar
  35. Meichenbaum, D., & Goodman, J. Reflection impulsivity and verbal control of motor behavior.Child Development, 1969,40, 785–797.Google Scholar
  36. Meichenbaum, D., & Goodman, J. Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self-control.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971,77, 115–126.Google Scholar
  37. Minde, K., Lewin, D., Weiss, G., Laviqueur, H., Douglas, V. I., & Sykes, D. The hyperactive child in elementary school: A 5-year controlled follow-up.Exceptional Children, 1971,38, 215–221.Google Scholar
  38. Nelson, T.The effects of training in attention deployment of observing behavior in reflective and impulsive children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1968.Google Scholar
  39. O'Leary, K. D., Pelham, W. E., Rosenbaum, A., & Price, G. H. Behavioral treatment of hyperkinetic children: An experimental evaluation of its usefulness.Clinical Pediatrics, 1976,15, 274–279.Google Scholar
  40. Palkes, H., Stewart, M., & Freedman, J. Improvement in maze performance of hyperactive boys as a function of verbal-training procedures.Journal of Special Education, 1972,5, 337–342.Google Scholar
  41. Palkes, H., Stewart, M., & Kahana, B. Porteus maze performance of hyperactive boys after training in self-directed verbal commands.Child Development, 1968,39, 817–826.Google Scholar
  42. Parry, P.The effect of reward on the performance of hyperactive children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, 1973.Google Scholar
  43. Parry, P., & Douglas, V. I. The effect of reward on the performance of hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  44. Patterson, G. An application of conditioning techniques to the control of a hyperactive child. In L. Ullman and L. Krasner (Eds.),Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1965.Google Scholar
  45. Patterson, G., Jones, R., Whittier, J., & Wright, M. A. A behavior modification technique for the hyperactive child.Behavior Research and Therapy, 1965,2, 217–226.Google Scholar
  46. Pihl, R. Conditioning procedures with hyperactive children.Neurology, 1967,17, 421–423.Google Scholar
  47. Porteus, S. D.Porteus maze tests: Fifty years' application. Palo Alto: Pacific Books, 1969.Google Scholar
  48. Quay, H. L., Sprague, R. L., Werry, J. S., & McQueen, M. M. Conditioning visual orientation of conduct problem children in the classroom.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1967,5, 512–517.Google Scholar
  49. Raven, J. C.Standard progressive matrices. London: H. K. Lewis, 1958.Google Scholar
  50. Ridberg, E., Park, R., & Hetherington, E. Modification of impulsive and reflective cognitive styles through observation of film-mediated models.Developmental Psychology, 1971,5, 369–377.Google Scholar
  51. Robin, A., Sandi, A., & O'Leary, K. The effects of self instruction on writing deficiencies.Behavior Therapy, 1975,6, 178–187.Google Scholar
  52. Rosenbaum, A., O'Leary, K. D., & Jacob, R. G. Behavioral intervention with hyperactive children: Group consequences as a supplement to individual contingencies.Behavior Therapy, 1975,6, 315–323.Google Scholar
  53. Ross, A. O.Psychological aspects of learning disabilities and reading disorders. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.Google Scholar
  54. Safer, D., & Allen, R. Stimulant drug treatment of hyperactive adolescents.Diseases of the Nervous System, 1975,5, 454–457.Google Scholar
  55. Sleator, E. K., von Neuman, A., and Sprague, R. L. Hyperactive children: A continuous long-term placebo-controlled follow-up.Journal of the American Medical Association, 1974,229, 316–317.Google Scholar
  56. Sprague, R. L., Christensen, D. E., & Werry, J. S. Experimental psychology and stimulant drugs. In C. K. Conners (Ed.),Symposium on the clinical use of stimulant drugs in children. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1974.Google Scholar
  57. Sroufe, L. A. Drug treatment of children with behavior problems. In F. Horowitz (Ed.),Review of child development research (Vol. 4). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  58. Swanson, J. M., & Kinsbourne, M. Stimulant related state-dependent learning in hyperactive children,Science, 1976,192, 1354–1356.Google Scholar
  59. Sykes, D. H., Douglas, V. I., & Morgenstern, G. The effect of methylphenidate (Ritalin) on sustained attention in hyperactive children.Psychopharmacologia (Berlin), 1972,25, 262–274.Google Scholar
  60. Sykes, D. H., Douglas, V. I., & Morgenstern, G. Sustained attention in hyperactive children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1973,14, 213–220.Google Scholar
  61. Thorensen, C. E., & Mahoney, M.J. Behavioral self control. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1974.Google Scholar
  62. Wechsler, D.Wechsler intelligence scale for children. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1949.Google Scholar
  63. Weiss, G., Kruger, E., Danielson, V., & Elman, M.The effect of long-term treatment of hyperactive children with methylphenidate. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Meeting of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, Palm Springs, California, 1973.Google Scholar
  64. Whalen, C., & Henker, B. Psychostimulants in children: A review and analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1976 (in press).Google Scholar
  65. Zelniker, T., Jeffrey, W., Ault, R., & Parsons, J. Analysis and modification of search strategies of impulsive and reflective children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test.Child Development, 1972,43, 321–335.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virginia I. Douglas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Penny Parry
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter Marton
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chrystelle Garson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Montreal Children's HospitalCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations