Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 497–510 | Cite as

Preschool peer perceptions of the behavior of hyperactive and aggressive children

  • Richard Milich
  • Paul Whitten
  • Steven Landau
  • Gretchen Kilby
Article

Abstract

To assess if preschool children can successfully identify externalizing symptomatic behaviors in their male classmates, and if these perceptions are associated with peer-rated popularity and rejection, 154 preschool boys and girls were interviewed using a peer nomination procedure. Behavioral data on the same preschool boys (N=86) were also provided by their respective teachers. Preschool children were capable of providing stable nominations of popularity, rejection, and aggression, boys and girls significantly agreed in their nominations, and these nominations were not a function of the age of the rated child, although they differed somewhat as a function of the age of the rater. Teachers and peers reflected significant convergence in ratings of hyperactivity and aggression and teacher ratings of peer problems significantly agreed with actual peer nominations of popularity and rejection. Boys nominated as aggressive were more rejected by their classmates, whereas boys nominated as hyperactive were either more popular and /or more rejected. Limited evidence for differential patterns of relationships among hyperactivity, aggression, and peer status was obtained for both the peer and teacher data.

Keywords

Preschool Child Limited Evidence Behavioral Data Teacher Rating Differential Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference notes

  1. 1.
    Milich, R. Hyperactivity, aggression and peer status. In R. Milich (Chair),Peer relations among hyperactive children. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, September 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pelham, W., Atkins, S., & Murphy, H. Attention deficit disorder with and without hyperactivity. In W. Pelham (Chair),DSM-III category of attention deficit disorders: Rationale, operationalization, and correlates. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, August 1981.Google Scholar

References

  1. 3.
    Achenbach, T. M. DSM-III in light of empirical research on the classification of child psychopathology.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1980,19, 395–412.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. The classification of child psychopathology: A review and analysis of empirical efforts.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 1275–1301.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C., 1980.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Asher, S. R., Singleton, L. C., Tinsky, B. R., & Hymel, S. A reliable sociometric measure for preschool children.Developmental Psychology, 1979,15, 443–444.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959,56, 81–105.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Campbell, J. D., & Yarrow, M. R. Perceptual and behavioral correlates of social effectiveness.Sociometry, 1961,24, 1–20.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Clifford, E. Social visability.Child Development, 1963,34, 799–808.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Cohen, J., & Cohen, P.Applied multiple regression correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    Conners, C. K. A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969,126, 152–156.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    Cowen, E. L., Pederson, A., Babigian, H., Izzo, L. D., & Trost, M. A. Long-term follow-up of early detected vulnerable children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973,41, 438–446.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Crowther, J. H., Bond, L. A., & Rolf, J. E. The incidence, prevalence, and severity of behavior disorders among preschool-age children in day care.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1981,9, 23–42.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Furman, W., & Masters, J. C. Peer interactions, sociometric status, and resistance to deviation in young children.Developmental Psychology, 1980,16, 229–236.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    Glow, R. A., & Glow, P. H. Peer and self-rating: Children's perception of behavior relevant to hyperkinetic impulse disorder.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1980,8, 471–490.Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    Green, K. D., Beck, S. J., Forehand, R., & Vosk, B. Validity of teacher nominations of child behavior problems.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1980,8, 397–404.Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    Green, K. D., & Forehand, R. Assessment of children's social skills: A review of methods.Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 1980,2, 143–159.Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    Hartup, W., Glazer, J., & Charlesworth, R. Peer reinforcement and sociometric status.Child Development, 1967,38, 1017–1024.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Janes, C. L., Hesselbrock, V. M., Myers, D. G., & Penniman, J. H. Problem boys in young adulthood: Teachers' ratings and twelve-year follow-up.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1979,8, 453–472.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    Johnston, A., DeLuca, D., Murtaugh, K., & Diener, E. Validation of a laboratory play measure of child aggression.Child Development, 1977,48, 324–327.Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    LaGreca, A. M. Peer acceptance: The correspondence between children's sociometric scores and teachers' ratings of peer interactions.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1981,9, 167–178.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    Lahey, B., Green, K. D., & Forehand, R. On the independence of ratings of hyperactivity, conduct problems, and attention deficits in children: A multiple regression analysis.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980,48, 566–574.Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    Lesser, G. S. The relationship between various forms of aggression and popularity among lower-class children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1959,50, 20–25.Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    Loney, J., Langhorne, J. E., Jr., & Paternite, C. E. An empirical basis for subgrouping the hyperkinetic/minimal brain dysfunction syndrome.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1978,87, 431–441.Google Scholar
  23. 25.
    Loney, J., & Milich, R. Hyperactivity, inattention, and aggression in clinical practice. In M. Wolraich & D. Routh (Eds.),Advances in developmental and behavioral pediatrics (Vol. 2). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  24. 26.
    Maas, E., Maracek, J., & Travers, J. R. Children's conceptions of disordered behavior.Child Development, 1978,49, 146–154.Google Scholar
  25. 27.
    Marshall, H. R., & McCandless, B. R. A study in prediction of social behavior of preschool children.Child Development, 1957,28, 149–159.Google Scholar
  26. 28.
    Masters, J. C., & Furman, W. Popularity, individual friendship selection, and specific peer interaction among children.Developmental Psychology, 1981,17, 344–350.Google Scholar
  27. 29.
    Milich, R., & Landau, S. Socialization and peer relations in hyperactive children. In K. D. Gadow & I. Bialer (Eds.),Advances in learning and behavior disabilities. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  28. 30.
    Olweus, D. Aggression and peer acceptance in adolescent boys: Two short-term longitudinal studies of ratings.Child Development, 1977,48, 1301–1313.Google Scholar
  29. 31.
    Olweus, D.Aggression in the schools. Washington: Hemisphere, 1978.Google Scholar
  30. 32.
    Pekarik, E. G., Prinz, R. J., Liebert, D. C., Weintraub, S., & Neale, J. M. The Pupil Evaluation Inventory: A sociometric technique for assessing children's social behavior.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1976,4, 83–97.Google Scholar
  31. 33.
    Pelham, W. E., & Bender, M. E. Peer interactions of hyperactive children: Assessment and treatment. In K. D. Gadow & I. Gialer (Eds.),Advances in learning and behavior difficulties. Greenwhich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  32. 34.
    Roff, M. Childhood social interactions and young adult psychosis.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1963,19, 152–157.Google Scholar
  33. 35.
    Roff, M., & Sells, S. B. Juvenile delinquency in relations to peer acceptance, rejection and socioeconomic status.Psychology in the Schools, 1968,5, 3–18.Google Scholar
  34. 36.
    Ullman, C. A. Teachers, peers and tests as predictors of adjustment.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1957,48, 257–267.Google Scholar
  35. 37.
    Vaughn, B. E., & Waters, E. Attention structure, sociometric status, and dominance: Interrelations, behavioral correlates, and relationships to social competence.Developmental Psychology, 1981,17, 275–288.Google Scholar
  36. 38.
    Weir, K., Stevenson, J., & Graham, P. Behavioral deviance and teacher ratings of prosocial behavior.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1980,19, 68–77.Google Scholar
  37. 39.
    Werry, J. S., Sprague, R. L., & Coehn, M. N. Conners' teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children-An empirical study.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1975,3, 217–229.Google Scholar
  38. 40.
    West, D. J., & Farrington, D. P.Who becomes delinquent? London: Heinemann, 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Milich
    • 2
  • Paul Whitten
    • 2
  • Steven Landau
    • 1
  • Gretchen Kilby
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South DakotaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of IowaIowa City

Personalised recommendations