Effect of luminance and contrast on stereoscopic acuity

  • Thomas Geib
  • Christian Baumann
Clinical Investigations

Abstract

The threshold of binocular depth perception was measured in 11 healthy volunteers. A three-rod arrangement was employed in which both the luminance of the rods and that of the adapting field could be adjusted independently. This allowed fixing the contrast when the effect of luminance was studied or fixing the luminance when the effect of contrast was investigated. The observation distance was 400 mm. Thresholds were expressed as angular disparities and were based on 75% correct responses. Points of subjective equality were also determined. Lowest thresholds (2.85 ± 0.67 s of arc) were found for a moderate contrast of 0.5 whereas low (0.05) and high (0.95) contrast both produced significantly higher thresholds (luminance 250 cd/m2). Altering the field luminance (50, 250, 1600 cd/m2) under constant contrast conditions (0.95) did not measurably influence stereoscopic acuity.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amigo G (1963) Variation of stereoscopic acuity with observation distance. J Opt Soc Am 53:630–635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blakemore C, Campbell FW (1969) On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol 203:237–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bliss CJ (1934) The method of probits. Science 79:38–39Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bourdon B (1900) L'acuité stéréoscopique. Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger 49:74–78Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finney DJ (1952) Probit analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fisher RA, Yates F (1963) Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research. 6th edn. Oliver and Boyd, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fullerton GS, Cattell JM (1892) On the perception of small differences. Publications of the University of Pennsylvania, Philosophical Series, no. 2. University of Pennsylvania Press Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 4–159Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graham CH (1951) Visual perception. In: Stevens SS (ed) Handbook of experimental psychology, chap 23. Wiley, New York, pp 868–920Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Helmholtz H (1864) Über den Horopter. Arch Ophthalmol 10 [Abt 1]:1–60Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Helmholtz H (1910) Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik, vol 3, 3rd edn. In: Gullstrand A, von Kries J, Nagel W (eds). Voss, Hamburg Leipzig, pp 307–330Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kulikowski JJ (1978) Limit of single vision in stereopsis depends on contour sharpness. Nature 275:126–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Langlands NMS (1929) Reports of the Committee Upon the Physiology of Vision: IV. Experiments on binocular vision. Medical Research Council, Special Report Series No 133. His Majesty's Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Le Grand Y (1968) Light, colour and vision, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 83–84Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Monjé M (1948) Über die Untersuchung der Tiefensehschärfe mit dem Stereo -Eidometer. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 148:345–357Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Linder A, Berchtold W (1976) Statistische Auswertung von Prozentzahlen. Birkhäuser, Basel Stuttgart, pp 88–96Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mueller CG, Lloyd VV (1948) Stereoscopic acuity for various levels of illumination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 34:223–227Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ogle KN (1964) Researches in binocular vision. Hafner, New York London, pp 18–28Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ogle KN, Weil MP (1958) Stereoscopic vision and the duration of the stimulus. Arch Ophthalmol 59:4–17Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olbricht F (1961) Experimentelle Untersuchungen der Tiefensehschärfe am Dreistäbchengerat each FP Fischer. Wissensch Z Karl-Marx-Univ. Leipzig, math.-nat. Reihe 10:705–708Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pantle A, Sekuler R (1968) Size-detecting mechanisms in human vision. Science 162:1146–1148Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stigmar G (1971) Blurred visual stimuli II. The effect of blurred visual stimuli on vernier and stereo-acuity. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 49:364–379Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tschermak A (1931) Optischer Raumsinn. In: Bethe A, Bergmann G von, Embden G, Ellinger A (eds) Handbuch der normalen and pathologischen Physiologic, vol 12, part 2. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 834–1000Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Nes FL, Bouman MA (1967) Spatial modulation transfer in the human eye. J Opt Soc Am 57:401–406Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Westheimer G (1979) Cooperative neural processes in stereoscopic acuity. Exp Brain Res 36:585–597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Woodburne LS (1934) The effect of a constant visual angle upon binocular discrimination of depth differences. Am J Psychol 46:273–286Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Geib
    • 1
  • Christian Baumann
    • 1
  1. 1.Physiologisches InstitutJustus-Liebig-UniversitätGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations