Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 253–263 | Cite as

Auditory overselectivity in autistic children

  • Barry S. Reynolds
  • Crighton D. Newsom
  • O. Ivar Lovaas
Article

Abstract

Autistic and normal children were trained to respond to a complex stimulus containing two auditory components. After the discrimination was acquired, the individual components were presented separately, allowing assessment of the extent to which the child's responding was controlled by one or both of the cues. The autistic children, unlike the normal children, provided evidence for stimulus overselectivity in that 6 of 8 autistic subjects responded to only one of the components. These results are consistent with those of previous studies which showed that when autistic children are presented with a complex visual or multiple-modality stimulus, they selectively respond to only one component of the complex. The present results extend the stimulus overselectivity hypothesis to the situation where all of the stimuli occur within the auditory modality. It is suggested that auditory overselectivity may partially account for autistic deficits in speech comprehension.

Keywords

Individual Component Normal Child Autistic Child Complex Stimulus Auditory Modality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anthony, J. An experimental approach to the psychopathology of childhood autism.British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1958,31, 211–225.Google Scholar
  2. Crane, N. L., & Ross, L. E. A developmental study of attention to cue redundancy introduced following discrimination learning.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1967,5, 1–15.Google Scholar
  3. Goldfarb, W.Childhood schizophrenia. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  4. Hagen, J. W. The effect of distraction on selective attention.Child Development, 1967,38, 685–694.Google Scholar
  5. Hagen, J. W., & Hale, G. A. The development of attention in children. In A. D. Pick (Ed.),Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, Vol. 7. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1973, 117–140.Google Scholar
  6. Hale, G. A., & Morgan, J. S. Developmental trends in children's component selection.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1973,15, 302–314.Google Scholar
  7. Hale, G. A., & Piper, R. A. Developmental trends in children's incidental learning: Some critical stimulus differences.Developmental Psychology, 1973,8, 327–335.Google Scholar
  8. Hale, G. A., & Taweel, S. S. Children's component selection with varying degrees of training.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974,17, 229–241.Google Scholar
  9. Hefferman, A. A psychiatric study of fifty preschool children referred to hospital for suspected deafness. In G. Caplan (Ed.),Emotional problems of early childhood. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1955.Google Scholar
  10. Hingtgen, J. N., & Bryson, C. Q. Recent developments in the study of early childhood psychosis: Infantile autism, childhood schizophrenia, and related disorders.Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1972,5, 8–54.Google Scholar
  11. Jakobsen, R., Fant, C., & Halle, M.Preliminaries to speech analysis: The distinctive features and their correlates. Cambridge, M. I. T. Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  12. Kanner, L. Autistic disturbances of affective contact.Nervous Child, 1943,2, 217–250.Google Scholar
  13. Koegel, R., & Wilhelm, H. Selective responding to multiple visual cues by autistic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1973,15, 442–453.Google Scholar
  14. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. Perception of the speech cote.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 431–461.Google Scholar
  15. Lovaas, O. I., & Schreibman, L. Stimulus overselectivity of autistic children in a two stimulus situation.Behavior Research and Therapy, 1967,9, 305–310.Google Scholar
  16. Lovaas, O. I., Schreibman, L., Koegel, R., & Rehm, R. Selective responding by autistic children to multiple sensory input.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971,77, 211–222.Google Scholar
  17. Maccoby, E. E., & Hagen, J. W. Effects of distraction upon central versus incidental recall: Developmental trends.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1965,2, 280–289.Google Scholar
  18. O'Connor, N., & Hermelin, B. The selective visual attention of psychotic children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1967,8, 167–179.Google Scholar
  19. O'Gorman, G.The nature of childhood autism. London: Butterworths, 1967.Google Scholar
  20. Rimland, B.Infantile autism. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964.Google Scholar
  21. Rutter, M. Behavioral and cognitive characteristics of a series of psychotic children. In J. K. Wing (Ed.),Early childhood autism. London: Pergamon Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  22. Rutter, M. Concepts of autism: A review of research.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1968,9, 1–25.Google Scholar
  23. Schreibman, L. & Lovaas, O. I. Overselective response to social stimuli by autistic children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1973,1, 152–168.Google Scholar
  24. Siegel, A. W., & Stevenson, H. W. Incidental learning: A developmental study.Child Development, 1966,37, 811–817.Google Scholar
  25. Wing, J. K. Diagnosis, epidemiology, aetiology. In J. K. Wing (Ed.),Early childhood autism. London: Pergamon Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  26. Young, S. Visual attention in autistic and normal children: Effects of stimulus novelty, human attributes, and complexity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry S. Reynolds
    • 2
    • 1
  • Crighton D. Newsom
    • 2
    • 1
  • O. Ivar Lovaas
    • 1
  1. 1.Los Angeles Camarillo State HospitalCamarillo
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations