Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 143–153 | Cite as

Qualitative influences on the perception of movement: An experimental study

  • Lois Imber Mintz
  • Barry E. Collins
Article

Abstract

One of the most puzzling features of “hyperactivity” in children is the importance of activity itself. Generalized overactivity has not been found to be a valid diagnostic marker. Could some qualitative features of activity be important determinants of the perceived quantity of activity? The analogue study reported here derives from a social-psychological hypothesis that anything that makes a behavior more noticeable or distracting can create an illusion of increased movement. Subjects performed a simple cognitive task while watching short films of adult actors. Two variables were manipulated: (a) The sound level was either loud or quiet, and (b) instructions to subjects were varied so that the behaviors shown were perceived as either appropriate or inappropriate. Results strongly supported the hypothesis. Loudness and contextual inappropriateness made the films more distracting, produced higher ratings of the amount of movement observed, and led to more negative evaluations of the behaviors seen. Implications for assessment and intervention are discussed.

Keywords

Sound Level Hyperactive Child Judgment Process Abnormal Child Psychology Simple Cognitive Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barkley, R. A., & Ullman, D. G. (1975). A comparison of objective measures of activity and distractibility in hyperactive and nonhyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 231–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blunden, D., Spring, C., & Greenberg, L. M. (1974). Validation of the Classroom Behavior Inventory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 84–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolstad, D. D., & Johnson, S. M. (1977). The relationship between teachers’ assessment of students and the students’ actual behavior in the classroom.Child Development, 48, 570–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camp, B. W., & Zimet, S. G. (1974). The relationship of teacher rating scales to behavior observations and reading achievement of first grade children.Journal of Special Education, 8, 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins, B. E. (1981). Hyperactivity: Myth and entity. In M. B. Brewer & B. E. Collins (Eds.),Scientific inquiry in the social sciences: A volume in honor of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 385–412). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, B. E., Whalen, C. K., & Henker, B. (1980). Ecological and pharmacological influences of behaviors in the classroom: The hyperkinetic syndrome. In J. Antrobus, S. Salzinger, & J. Glick (Eds.),The eco-system of the “sick kid” (pp. 104–137). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children.Psychopharmacology Bulletin (Special issue: Pharamacotherapy of Children), 24–84.Google Scholar
  8. Henker, B., Whalen, C. K., & Collins, B. E. (1979). Double-blind and triple-blind assessments of medication and placebo responses in hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lambert, N. M., Sandoval, J., & Sassone, D. (1978). Prevalence of hyperactivity in elementary school children as a function of social system definers.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48, 446–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McArthur, L. (1980). What grabs you? The role of attention in impression formation and causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.),Social cognitions: Cognitive structure and processes underlying person memory and social judgments (pp. 201–241). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Porrino, L. J., Rapoport, J. L., Behar, D., Sceery, W., Ismond, D. R., & Bunney, W. E., Jr. (1983). A naturalistic assessment of the motor activity of hyperactive boys. I. Comparison with normal controls.Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 681–687.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Routh, D. K., & Schroeder, C. S. (1976). Standardized playroom measures as indices of hyperactivity.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 199–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sandberg, S. T., Rutter, M. O., & Taylor, E. (1978). Hyperkinetic disorder in psychiatric clinic attenders.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 20, 279–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249–283). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Trites, R. L., Blouin, A. G., & Laprade, K. (1982). Factor analysis of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale based on a large normative sample.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 615–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Whalen, C. K. (1983). Hyperactivity, learning problems, and the attention deficit disorders. In T. H. Ollendick & M. Hersen (Eds.),Handbook of child psychopathology (pp. 151–199). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Whalen, C. K., Collins, B. E., Henker, B., Alkus, S. R., Adams, D., & Stapp, J. (1978). Behavior observations of hyperactive children and methylphenidate (Ritalin) effects in systematically structured classroom environments: Now you see them, now you don’t.Journal of Pediatrie Psychology, 3, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Whalen, C. K., Henker, B., Collins, B. E., Finck, D., & Dotemoto, S. (1979). A social ecology of hyperactive boys: Medication effects in structured classroom environments.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 65–81.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lois Imber Mintz
    • 1
  • Barry E. Collins
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations