A comparison of the effects of child management and planned activities training in five parenting environments
This study compared the effects of two procedures designed to enhance the extratraining effects of behavioral parent training. Twenty parents of oppositional children were randomly assigned to either a child management training condition or a combined child management plus planned activities condition. A further 10 nonproblem children and their parents served as a social validation group. Observations of both parent and child behavior were conducted in each of five home observation settings (breakfast time, kindy (kindergarten) or school exit, a structured playtime, bathtime, and bedtime). Both training procedures resulted in changes in both child oppositional and parent aversive behavior in all observation settings. In addition, desired positive parenting behaviors also improved in all settings. Treatment effects were maintained in all settings at 3-month follow-up. Comparisons between oppositional children following treatment and children in the social validation group showed that they each displayed similarly low levels of oppositional behavior in all settings. The implications of the results for facilitating generalized changes in behavioral parent training are discussed.
KeywordsParent Behavior Child Management Apply Behavior Analysis Behavioral Parent Training Oppositional Behavior
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dadds, M. R., Sanders, M. R., & James, J. E. (1982).Programming for generalization and maintenance in parent training through planned activities and social support. Paper presented at the Fifth National Conference on Behavior Modification, Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
- Forehand, R., & McMahon, R. J. (1981).Helping the non-compliant child: A clinician’s guide to parent training. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Griest, D. L., Forehand, R., & Wells, K. C. (1981). Follow-up assessment of parent training: An analysis of who will participate.Child Study Journal, 11, 221–229.Google Scholar
- McMahon, R. J., Forehand, R., Griest, D. L., & Wells, K. C. (1981). Who drops out of therapy during parent behavioral training.Behavior Counselling Quarterly, 1, 79–85.Google Scholar
- O’ Brien, M., Porterfield, J., Herbert-Jackson, E., & Risley, T. R. (1979).The toddler center: A practical guide to day care for one and two year olds. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
- Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., Jones, R., & Conger, R. E. (1975).A social learning approach to family intervention: Families with aggressive children (Vol. 1). Eugene, Oregon: Castalia.Google Scholar
- Risely, T. R., Clark, H. B. & Cataldo, M. F. (1976). Behavioral technology for the normal middle-class family. In E. J. Nash, L. A. Hamerlynck, & L. C. Handy (Eds.),Behavior modification and families. New York, Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
- Sanders, M. R., & Christensen, A. P. (1983).An analysis of childrens oppositional behavior and parents’ coercive behavior across five parenting environments. Paper presented at the Sixth National Conference on Behavior Modification, Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
- Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, B. (1977).Applying behavior analysis procedures with children and youth. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar