Peer relationships in ADDH and normal children: A developmental analysis of peer and teacher ratings
- 84 Downloads
Peer and teacher perceptions of younger and older ADDH and normal children were compared. Peer nominations on the Pupil Evaluation Inventory revealed that ADDH children received more nominations on the Aggression factor and fewer on the Likability factor. ADDH boys received more nominations on the Withdrawal factor. Generally, older children received fewer nominations, but age did not interact with diagnosis; that is, younger and older ADDH children were perceived by peers as equally deviant. Discriminant analyses showed that peer ratings were useful in discriminating between ADDH and normal boys, but not between ADDH and normal girls. Teacher ratings of peer behavior suggested that older ADDH girls were perceived as less disturbed than younger girls. However, teacher ratings of boys revealed no age by diagnosis interactions. Low to moderate correlations were found between peer and teacher ratings of ADDH boys, and the pattern of relationship varied with age.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1981). Behavioral problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged four through sixteen.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46 (1, Serial No. 188).Google Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D. C.: Author.Google Scholar
- Conners, C. K. (1969). A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 152–156.Google Scholar
- Hartup, W. W. (1983). The peer system. In W. Mussen (Ed.),Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 103–196). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Johnston, C., Atkins, M. S., Pelham, W. E., & Crawford, J. (1983, June).A comparison of two sociometric instruments for the assessment of children’s social competence. Paper presented at the Canadian Psychological Association, Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar
- Milich, R., & Landau, S. (1982). Socialization and peer relations in the hyperactive child. In K. Gadow & I. Bialer (Eds.),Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 283–339). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Pelham, W. E. (1982a, August). Laboratory measures of attention in the diagnosis of hyperactivity-attention deficit disorder. In W. E. Pelham (Chair),Identification and diagnosis of children with attention deficit disorder-hyperactivity. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Pelham, W. E. (1982b). Childhood hyperactivity: Diagnosis, etiology, nature and treatment. In R. Gatchel, A. Baum, & J. Singer (Eds.),Behavioral medicine and clinical psychology: Overlapping disciplines (pp. 261–327). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Pelham, W. E., Atkins, M. S., & Murphy, H. A. (1981, September). ADD with and without hyperactivity: Parent, teacher, and peer rating correlates. In W. E. Pelham (Chair),DSM III category of attention deficit disorder: Rationale, operationalization, and correlates. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Pelham, W. E., & Bender, M. E. (1982). Peer relationships in hyperactive children: Description and treatment. In K. Gadow & I. Bialer (Eds.),Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 365–435). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Pelham, W. E., Atkins, M. S., Murphy, H. A., & Swanson, J. (1984).A rating scale for the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder: Teacher norms, factor analysis, and reliability. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Younger, A., Schwartzman, A. E., & Ledingham, J. E. (1982).Age-related changes in children’s perceptions of aggression and withdrawal in their peers (Research Bulletin, Vol. 1, No. 009). Montreal, Quebec: Concordia University.Google Scholar