Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 89–100 | Cite as

Peer relationships in ADDH and normal children: A developmental analysis of peer and teacher ratings

  • Charlotte Johnston
  • William E. Pelham
  • H. Allen Murphy


Peer and teacher perceptions of younger and older ADDH and normal children were compared. Peer nominations on the Pupil Evaluation Inventory revealed that ADDH children received more nominations on the Aggression factor and fewer on the Likability factor. ADDH boys received more nominations on the Withdrawal factor. Generally, older children received fewer nominations, but age did not interact with diagnosis; that is, younger and older ADDH children were perceived by peers as equally deviant. Discriminant analyses showed that peer ratings were useful in discriminating between ADDH and normal boys, but not between ADDH and normal girls. Teacher ratings of peer behavior suggested that older ADDH girls were perceived as less disturbed than younger girls. However, teacher ratings of boys revealed no age by diagnosis interactions. Low to moderate correlations were found between peer and teacher ratings of ADDH boys, and the pattern of relationship varied with age.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1981). Behavioral problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged four through sixteen.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46 (1, Serial No. 188).Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D. C.: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, S. B., & Paulauskas, S. (1979). Peer relations in hyperactive children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 20, 233–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective.Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conners, C. K. (1969). A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 152–156.Google Scholar
  6. Halliday, R., Callaway, E., & Naylor, H. (1983). Visual evoked potential changes induced by methylphenidate in hyperactive childen: Dose response effects.Journal of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hartup, W. W. (1983). The peer system. In W. Mussen (Ed.),Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 103–196). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Johnston, C., Atkins, M. S., Pelham, W. E., & Crawford, J. (1983, June).A comparison of two sociometric instruments for the assessment of children’s social competence. Paper presented at the Canadian Psychological Association, Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Klein, A. R., & Young, R. D. (1979). Hyperactive boys in their classroom: Assessment of teacherand peer perceptions, interactions, and classroom behaviors.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 425–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. LaGreca, A. M. (1981). Peer acceptance: The correspondence between children’s sociometric scores and teacher’s ratings of peer interactions.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 9, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ledingham, J. E., Younger, A., Schwartzman, A., & Bergeron, G. (1982). Agreement among teacher, peer, and self-ratings of children’s aggression, withdrawal, and likability.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 363–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mash, E. J., & Johnston, C. (1982). A comparison of the mother-child interactions of younger and older hyperactive and normal children.Child Development, 51, 1371–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mash, E. J., & Johnston, C. (1983). Sibling interactions of hyperactive and normal children and their relationship to reports of maternal stress and self-esteem.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Milich, R., & Landau, S. (1982). Socialization and peer relations in the hyperactive child. In K. Gadow & I. Bialer (Eds.),Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 283–339). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  15. Milich, R., Landau, S., Kilby, G., & Whitten, P. (1982). Preschool peer perceptions of the behavior of hyperactive and aggressive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 497–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pekarik, E. G., Prinz, R. J., Liebert, D. E., Weintraub, S., & Neale, J. M. (1976). The Pupil Evaluation Inventory: A sociometric technique for assessing children’s social behavior.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 83–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pelham, W. E. (1982a, August). Laboratory measures of attention in the diagnosis of hyperactivity-attention deficit disorder. In W. E. Pelham (Chair),Identification and diagnosis of children with attention deficit disorder-hyperactivity. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  18. Pelham, W. E. (1982b). Childhood hyperactivity: Diagnosis, etiology, nature and treatment. In R. Gatchel, A. Baum, & J. Singer (Eds.),Behavioral medicine and clinical psychology: Overlapping disciplines (pp. 261–327). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Pelham, W. E., Atkins, M. S., & Murphy, H. A. (1981, September). ADD with and without hyperactivity: Parent, teacher, and peer rating correlates. In W. E. Pelham (Chair),DSM III category of attention deficit disorder: Rationale, operationalization, and correlates. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  20. Pelham, W. E., & Bender, M. E. (1982). Peer relationships in hyperactive children: Description and treatment. In K. Gadow & I. Bialer (Eds.),Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 365–435). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pelham, W. E., Atkins, M. S., Murphy, H. A., & Swanson, J. (1984).A rating scale for the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder: Teacher norms, factor analysis, and reliability. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  22. Singleton, L., & Asher, S. (1977). Peer preferences and social interaction among third-grade children in an integrated school district.Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weintraub, S., Prinz, R. J., & Neale, J. M. (1978). Peer evaluations of the competence of children vulnerable to psychopathology.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 461–473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Whalen, C. K., Henker, B., Dotemoto, S., & Hinshaw, S. P. (1983). Child and adolescent perceptions of normal and atypical peers.Child Development, 54, 1588–1598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Younger, A., Schwartzman, A. E., & Ledingham, J. E. (1982).Age-related changes in children’s perceptions of aggression and withdrawal in their peers (Research Bulletin, Vol. 1, No. 009). Montreal, Quebec: Concordia University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlotte Johnston
    • 1
  • William E. Pelham
    • 1
  • H. Allen Murphy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFlorida State UniversityTallahassee

Personalised recommendations