Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 511–518 | Cite as

The Conners Abbreviated Teacher Rating Scale: Development of norms in Brazil

  • Gilberto N. O. Brito
Article

Abstract

Normative data for the Conners Abbreviated (10-item) Teacher Rating Scale (CATRS-10) derived from 1,068 children in Brazil are presented. Ratings of boys were higher than ratings of girls, and younger children had higher ratings than older children. Test-retest reliability data indicate that the CATRS-10 has acceptable reliability in Brazil but only when the same teacher rates the child at both test and retest (interval of 1 to 3 months). This study found that ratings at retest were significantly lower than ratings at first test whether or not the same teacher rated the child on both occasions. The CATRS-10 was shown to be a valid instrument in Brazil since children with behavioral problems requiring medical or psychological treatment were rated higher than children without such problems.

Keywords

Young Child Normative Data Behavioral Problem Reliability Data Psychological Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Conners, C. K. (1970). Symptom patterns in hyperkinetic, neurotic, and normal children.Child Development, 41, 667–682.Google Scholar
  2. Conners, C. K. (1972). Pharmacotherapy of psychopathology in children. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.),Psychopathological disorders of childhood. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales in drug studies with children.Psychopharmacology Bulletin (Special Issue:Pharmacotherapy of Children), 24–29.Google Scholar
  4. Conners, C. K. (1980).Food additives and hyperactive children. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  5. Conners, C. K., & Barkley, R. A. (1985). Rating scales and checklists for child psychopharmacology.Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 27, 809–815.Google Scholar
  6. Goyette, C. H., Conners, C.K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221–236.Google Scholar
  7. Hollingshead, A. B., & Redlich, F. C. (1958).Social class and mental illness. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (1980).IX Recenseamento Geral. Rio de Janeiro: Gráfica IBGE.Google Scholar
  9. Sprague, R. L., & Sleator, E. K. (1973). Effects of psychopharmacologic agents on learning disorders.Pediatric Clinics of North America, 20, 719–735.Google Scholar
  10. Werry, J. S., & Sprague, R. L. (1974). Methylphenidate in children: Effects of dosage.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 8, 9–19.Google Scholar
  11. Werry, J. S., Sprague, R. L., & Cohen, M. N. (1975). Teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children — An empirical study.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 217–229.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilberto N. O. Brito
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro de Ciencias MedicasUniversidade Federal FluminenseNiteroi, RJBrazil

Personalised recommendations