This paper asks for legislation that will remove criminal sanctions from good faith decisions by parents and physicians to allow severely defective newborns to die. In so doing it attempts to bring to satisfactory resolution conflicting points of view in the disciplines of moral philosophy, medicine, and law. This paper argues that euthanasia of severely defective newborns is morally justifiable and legally permissible within reasonable extensions of current interpretations of the Federal Constitution by the Supreme Court. It describes the medical dilemma, evaluates the moral issues involved, and delineates possible legal alternatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Claire Thomas is on the faculty of the University of Washington Women Studies Program and is an adjunct professor at Central Washington University.
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, C. Potential for personhood: A measure of life the severely defective newborn, legal implications of a social-medical dilemma. Bioethics Quarterly 2, 164–193 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917063
- Moral Philosophy
- Moral Issue
- Good Faith
- Legal Implication
- Criminal Sanction