Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Potential for personhood: A measure of life the severely defective newborn, legal implications of a social-medical dilemma

  • 64 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

This paper asks for legislation that will remove criminal sanctions from good faith decisions by parents and physicians to allow severely defective newborns to die. In so doing it attempts to bring to satisfactory resolution conflicting points of view in the disciplines of moral philosophy, medicine, and law. This paper argues that euthanasia of severely defective newborns is morally justifiable and legally permissible within reasonable extensions of current interpretations of the Federal Constitution by the Supreme Court. It describes the medical dilemma, evaluates the moral issues involved, and delineates possible legal alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Author information

Correspondence to Claire Thomas J.D., M.A..

Additional information

Claire Thomas is on the faculty of the University of Washington Women Studies Program and is an adjunct professor at Central Washington University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, C. Potential for personhood: A measure of life the severely defective newborn, legal implications of a social-medical dilemma. Bioethics Quarterly 2, 164–193 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917063

Download citation

Keywords

  • Moral Philosophy
  • Moral Issue
  • Good Faith
  • Legal Implication
  • Criminal Sanction