Constraining inverse stefan design problems

  • J. I. Frankel
Original Papers


A new formulation possessing stable numerical characteristics is presented for inverse Stefan design processes. In such processes, the goal of the analysis is to design transient boundary conditions which produce the desired interfacial surface motion. This subclass of mildly ill-posed mathematical problems is amenable to the proposed solution methodology. This investigation presents a fixed-front differential formulation from which a weighted residual statement is developed. Orthogonal collocation is used to obtain numerical results illustrating the merit of imposing physical constraints in the mathematical model. These mathematical constraints can be viewed as design specifications and are available to the designer or experimentalist. The proposed methodology is flexible and can be generalized to problems involving continuous casting or crystal growth. Finally, symbolic manipulation is used for augmenting the computational methodology.


Crystal Growth Design Problem Mathematical Problem Design Specification Continuous Casting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Zabaras, N.,Inverse finite element techniques for the analysis of solidification processes, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng.,29, 1569–1587 (1990).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Zabaras, N., Mukherjee, S. and Richmond, O.,An analysis of inverse heat transfer problems with phase changes using an integral method, J. Heat Transfer,110, 554–561 (1988).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Zabaras, N. and Ruan, Y.,A deforming finite element method analysis of inverse Stefan problems, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng.,28, 295–313 (1989).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Zabaras, N. and Mukherjee, S.,An analysis of solidification problems by the boundary element method, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng.,24, 1879–1900 (1987).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Zabaras, N., Ruan, Y. and Richmond, O.,Design of two-dimensional Stefan processes with desired freezing front motions, Num. Heat Transfer, Part B,21, 307–325 (1992).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Zabaras, N. and Kang, S.,On the solution of an ill-posed design solidification problem using minimization techniques in finite- and infinite-dimensional function spaces, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng.,36, 3973–3990 (1993).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Beck, J. V., Blackwell, B. and St. Clair, C. A.,Inverse Heat Conduction, Wiley, New York (1985).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ozisik, M. N.,Heat Conduction, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York 1993.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Frankel, J. I.,A boundary integral formulation to an inverse solidification design problem, BEM 17, University of Wisconsin 1995.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Finlayson, B. A.,The Method of Weighted Residuals and Variational Principles, Academic Press, New York 1972.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Frankel, J. I.,Cumulative variable formulation for transient conductive and radiative transport in participating media, AIAA J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer,9, no. 2, 210–218 (1995).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Katz, M. A. and Rubinsky, B.,An inverse finite element technique to determine the change of phase interface location in one-dimensional melting problems, Num. Heat Transfer,7, 269–283 (1984).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Rivlin, T. J.,The Chebyshev Polynomials, Wiley, New York 1974.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Delves, L. M. and Mohamad, J. L.,Computational Methods for Integral Equations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. I. Frankel
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering DeptUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations