Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 491–500 | Cite as

Effects of amphetamine on vigilance performance in normal and hyperactive children

  • A. J. Sostek
  • M. S. Buchsbaum
  • J. L. Rapoport
Article

Abstract

Deficient sustained attention is a symptom of hyperactivity that can be improved by stimulant medication. Recently, amphetamine has been shown to increase detections during a vigilance task in both normal and hyperactive boys. The present study applied signal detection analysis to the vigilance performance of 15 hyperactive and 14 normal boys divided into two age groups (6–9 and 10–12). A computerized continuous performance test was administered under amphetamine and placebo. Overall group comparisons indicated that perceptual sensitivity or d′ was higher for the normal boys and the older groups, and analysis of drug treatments showed that amphetamine significantly increased d′. Interactions between drugs and age groups demonstrated that amphetamine affected the younger boys to a significantly greater degree than the older children for both d′ and response bias or β. It is notable that the results were essentially parallel for both normal and hyperactive children.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. D., & Colquhoun, W. P. Signal probability and vigilance: A reapraisal of the “signal-rate” effect.British Journal of Psychology, 1969,60, 169–178.Google Scholar
  2. Conners, C. K. Symptom patterns in hyperkinetic, neurotic, and normal children.Child Development, 1970,41, 667–682.Google Scholar
  3. Douglas, V. I. Sustained attention and impulse control: Implications for the handicapped child In C. E. Sherrick, R. N. Haber, W. A. Wickelgren, P. Suppes, E. H. Lenneberg, B. S. Long, V. I. Douglas, C. P. Baldwin, A. L. Baldwin, J. A. Swets, & L. L. Elliott (Eds.),Psychology and the handicapped child. Washington, D. C: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1974. pp. 149–168.Google Scholar
  4. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A.Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. Grossberg, J. M. & Grant, B. F. Clinical psychophysics: Applications of ratio scaling and signal detection methods to research on pain, fear, drugs, and medical decision making.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 1154.Google Scholar
  6. Halliday, R., Callaway, E., Rosenthal, J., & Naylor, H. The effects of methylphenidate dosage on the visual event related potential of hyperactive children. In D. Lehmann & E. Callaway (Eds.),Human evoked potentials. New York: Plenum Press, 1979. Pp. 153–167.Google Scholar
  7. Hink, R. F., Fenton, W. H., Tinklenberg, J. R., Pfefferbaum, A., & Kopell, B. S. Vigilance and human attention under conditions of methylphenidate and secobarbital intoxication: An assessment using brain potentials.Psychophysiology, 1978,15, 116–125.Google Scholar
  8. Kupietz, S. S., & Balka, E. B. Alterations in the vigilance performance of children receiving amitriptyline and methulphenidate pharmacotherapy.Psychopharmacology, 1976,50, 29–33.Google Scholar
  9. Kupietz, S. S., & Richardson, E. Children's vigilance performance and inattentiveness in the classroom.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1978,19, 145–154.Google Scholar
  10. Levy, F. The development of sustained attention (vigilance) and inhibition in children: Some normative data.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1980,21, 77–84.Google Scholar
  11. Loeb, M., & Binford, J. R. Variation in performance on auditory and visual monitoring tasks as a function of signal and stimulus frequencies.Perception and Psychophysics, 1968,4, 361–367.Google Scholar
  12. Loeb, M., Hawkes, G. R., Evans, W. O., & Alluisi, E. A. The influence of d-amphetamine, benactyzine and chlorpromazine on performance in an auditory vigilance task.Psychonomic Science, 1965,3, 29–30.Google Scholar
  13. Mackworth, J. F. The effect of amphetamine on the detectability of signals in a vigilance task.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1965,19, 104–109.Google Scholar
  14. Mackworth, J. F.Vigilance and habituation. New York: Penguin Books 1970.Google Scholar
  15. McNicol, D.A primer of signal detection theory. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1972.Google Scholar
  16. Rapoport, J. L., Buchsbaum, M. S., Zahn, T. P., Weingartner, H., Ludlow, C., & Mikkelsen, E. J. Dextroamphetamine: Cognitive and behavioral effect in normal prepubertal boys.Science, 1978,199, 560–563.Google Scholar
  17. Rosenthal, R. H., & Allen, T. W. An examination of attention, arousal, and learning dysfunctions of hyperkinetic children.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 689–715.Google Scholar
  18. Rutschmann, J., Comblatt, B., & Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. Sustained attention in children at risk for schizophrenia: Reports on a continuous performance test.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1977,34, 571–575.Google Scholar
  19. Sostek, A. J. Effects of electrodermal liability and payoff instructions on vigilance performance.Psychophysiology, 1978,15, 561–568.Google Scholar
  20. Swets, J. A., & Kristofferson, A. B. Attention.Annual Review of Psychology, 1970,21, 339–366.Google Scholar
  21. Werry, J. S. Medication for hyperkinetic children.Drugs, 1976,11, 81–89.Google Scholar
  22. Yepes, L. E., Balka, E. B., Winsberg, B. G., & Bialer, I. Amitriptyline and methylphenidate treatment of behaviorally disordered children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1977,18, 39–52.Google Scholar
  23. Zahn, T. P., Rapoport, J. L., & Thompson, C. L. Autonomic and and behavioral effects of dextroamphetamine and placebo in normal and hyperactive prepubertal boys.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1980,8, 145–160.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Sostek
    • 1
  • M. S. Buchsbaum
    • 1
  • J. L. Rapoport
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological Psychiatry BranchNational Institute of Mental HealthUSA

Personalised recommendations